Another Eskom blunder
KOEBERG: MAINTENANCE WORKER CUTS A VALVE AT THE WRONG UNIT
Latest in a string of human errors costing SA money, megawatts.
Despite the ever-present threat of load shedding, Eskom staff recently made a huge mistake which almost resulted in the loss of the 970 megwatt unit 1 at the Koeberg nuclear power station.
The generation capacity is virtually equal to one stage of load shedding.
This “significant incident” came while unit 2 at Koeberg is unavailable for power generation after it was taken offline on January 18 for refuelling and maintenance. It is due to return to service in June.
According to an internal Koeberg newsletter “an individual” who was doing maintenance on unit 2 cut a valve of unit 1 instead of unit 2. “In the light of this, we have had to implement a work stop following a significant event, which could have resulted in us losing the running unit,” the newsletter states.
Daily Maverick picked this up and published the relevant page on Thursday – and Eskom has confirmed the authenticity of the newsletter.
The newsletter further discloses that this is the second time this has happened. “This speaks to very poor human performance and it is an unacceptable practice,” it states.
It implies that there is no excuse for such a mistake. “We are equipped with the relevant training to correctly identify the unit and component we are tasked to work on,” and cautions staff to read the signage.
This near-miss is the latest in a string of Eskom blunders that are costing money and megawatts.
Earlier this month, Eskom was forced to defer the replacement of the steam generators at Koeberg’s unit 2 due to its own lack of preparation.
The replacement is part of a R20 billion project to extend the life of Koeberg by another 20 years beyond its current lifespan, which ends in 2024.
The generator replacement was due to take place during the current outage, but it became clear that Eskom’s poor preparation would result in a time overrun. Eskom announced the deferment because such an overrun would increase the risk of load shedding in winter.
The replacement is now due late next year, which means an additional five-month outage that South Africa’s constrained power supply system can hardly afford.
In addition, Eskom will probably be heavily penalised by the French contractors who were on site already and have dedicated resources for this project for the next couple of months.
Eskom has not yet been able to quantify such penalties.
According to Eskom’s data portal, 28% of its generation capacity has been unavailable due to unplanned breakdowns during March. This is the highest monthly average in the past two years.
–