Evidence exonerates mankind

The worst feature of climate alarm is the corruption of science. There is no evidence that mankind is changing the climate in a dangerous way. But there is huge ideological and financial interest in believing he is.

So evidence has to be faked to show dangerous warming, and science has to be prostituted to satisfy the alarmists.

The heart of the scare is the theory that rising CO2 is causing unprecedented warming. But during the Mediaeval Warm Period (MWP), a thousand years ago, temperatures worldwide were higher than now while CO2 was lower than now.

So science was corrupted to make the MWP disappear.

This was done by the fake science of the “hockey stick” graph in the 2001 report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), the main propaganda arm of alarm.

In 2009, some whistleblower leaked e-mails between influential alarmist scientists showing them cheating, manipulating data, crooking graphs and, above all, plotting to silence anyone who told the truth about climate change.

The “climategate” scandal was made worse by disgraceful establishment whitewashers posing as impartial investigations.

Now comes the “pausebuster” scandal. CO2 has risen sharply over past decades and, according to the alarmists, this should have caused high temperature increases.

But since about 1996, there has been a “pause” in global warming – no temperature rise.

This is shown clearly by the most accurate temperature measurements, taken by satellites. So again the evidence had to be faked to show warming.

NOAA (National Oceanic Atmosphere Administration), from the US, is the world’s most comprehensive station for surface based climate data (less accurate than satellite data.)

Its original data showed no alarming warming. So they were “homogenised” (translation: “crooked”) to show it.

In 2015, just before the Paris climate conference, the tampered data were revealed to frighten us all and make us give lots of money to the alarmist establishment.

This year, Dr John Bates, a senior NOAA scientist of high reputation, publicly admitted to the falsification of the data.