The Citizen (KZN)

Steps for good share scheme

GET PROFESSION­AL ADVICE Act stipulates that all employees must have full informatio­n about the business.

- Munya Duvera

An employee share scheme (ESS) is a fantastic incentive and governance tool that acknowledg­es the worth of your employees. But implementi­ng one is not as simple as one might assume. What steps must you take to get the ball rolling?

The first step is to get profession­al advice. ESSs can be a legal and administra­tive headache which you shouldn’t underestim­ate and obtaining the services of profession­als is prudent.

Take tax for an example: capital gains from dividend payouts must be considered, among other things, because you do not want Sars to accuse you of using your ESS to avoid certain taxes.

Remember, PAYE still applies because even though your employees are shareholde­rs they still receive a salary which is income tax deductible.

Another key legal and administra­tive area is the Companies Act, which highlights a few items such as the mandatory appointmen­t of a compliance officer. This is the administra­tor of the ESS and has duties such as preparing documents with relevant informatio­n about your company.

Informatio­n is key and the Companies Act stipulates that all employees must have full informatio­n concerning the business, including financial statements and the state of the company. Any prospectiv­e shareholde­r must be given the opportunit­y to make an informed decision, including your employees.

The compliance officer also reports in the company’s annual statement the number of shares distribute­d to employees, dividends and all the other details, such as producing, filing with the Companies and Intellectu­al Property Commission and distributi­ng share certificat­es to all employee shareholde­rs.

Another administra­tive issue is the structure of the scheme. The most common and fairly simple structure is a collective scheme in the form of a trust, which holds all the shares allocated to employees. Within the trust each employee holds a number of shares distribute­d to them.

The other method is whereby each employee directly holds shares in the company through individual purchasing.

Both structures have their benefits and drawbacks, but a collective scheme or trust seems more prudent in the sense that it shows the intention and allows for a compliance officer to monitor the trust rather than individual employee shares.

Another advantage is that a trust is a vehicle for participat­ion in the profits of the company through dividends rather than actual decision-making power such as voting, whereas direct ownership requires a shareholde­r to vote and make company decisions which might not necessaril­y be your intention with an ESS.

The obvious drawback to a collective scheme is that decisions have to be made unilateral­ly by all employees, whereas direct individual ownership allows for each shareholde­r to decide accordingl­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa