Ball-tampering ‘a cry for help’

Mumbai – Proteas paceman Dale Steyn believes this year’s Australian ball-tampering scandal could be viewed as a “cry for help” because the balance between bat and ball in cricket has become so skewed in favour of the batsmen.

Steyn did not condone their actions but said the incident exposed the need for cricket to change to prevent the loss of the art of reverse swing bowling.

“It’s obviously not on, but if you think about it, it’s almost like a cry for help. We need to do something,” Steyn said.

“There’s so much in favour of batsmen these days. Fields are small, two new balls, powerplays, bats have got bigger than they used to be, the list can go on.

“You bowl a ‘no ball’ and it’s a free hit. But I have never seen a rule change that favours the bowler.”

Steyn felt the need to get the ball to swing was forcing cricketers to flirt with regulations.

Typically, swing bowlers use the new ball to deviate it in the air to outwit batsmen but Pakistan’s fast bowlers stunned the world in the 1980s by introducing reverse swing to Test cricket.

The skill of making an old and battered ball move in the air in the opposite direction to conventional swing was developed into an art form in the following decade by their successors Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis.

In March, with South Africa already leading by more than 100 in the second innings for the loss of a single wicket on the third day of the third Test, a trio of Australians hatched a plan to tamper with the ball to get that reverse swing.

They paid a heavy price with batsman Cameron Bancroft, who was spotted with sandpaper in his hand, suspended for nine months, while Steve Smith and David Warner were stripped of the captaincy and vice-captaincy and handed one-year bans.

“It’s a big plea and it would be a sad day to see (reverse swing) disappear,” Steyn said.

“These are not rules that favour the bowler. They are, if anything, an aid to the batsman.” –