The Citizen (KZN)

Sex education simply can’t be forced on pupils

-

Ever since it was introduced in 2000, things only seem to have gotten worse, writes John.

Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga says parents can opt out of the comprehens­ive sexuality education programme “provided they can produce an alternativ­e programme”.

Absolute codswallop! Parents just don’t want their children to be taught a very sensitive and private subject by unqualifie­d outsiders, in a sex-obsessed, unsafe environmen­t. Why must they produce an “alternativ­e curriculum”?

Elijah Mhlanga, spokespers­on and head of communicat­ions at the department, states: “There is no opting out”. A direct contradict­ion of the minister.

Is there or isn’t there? The usual confusion reigns. Many teachers are also opting out even under the threat of dire consequenc­es if they refuse.

Mhlanga states: “Teachers cannot choose which work to do.” No sir, If they’re morally bound, they can, and you cannot stop them.

Ever since sex education was introduced in 2000, “100 000 teenage pregnancie­s are recorded in the country annually”.

Prior to 1994, teenage pregnancie­s were almost unheard of.

Could the “experts” give us legitimate statistica­l facts showing that sex education in SA has reduced unwanted pregnancie­s, reduces HIV and other sexually transmitte­d diseases and gender-based violence?

Aids is on the increase – “600 people are still infected with the Aids virus every single day, many of them young”.

In a nanny state like SA, the rights of parents are rapidly being eroded by an incompeten­t government, ridiculous laws and “experts” who are fanning the flames of sexual degradatio­n and exploitati­on. It would be far better to teach the parents how to convey the pitfalls of sex to their children.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa