The Citizen (KZN)

Calls to urgently open industry to Independen­t Power Producers

- Simnikiwe Hlatshanen­i

Now that load shedding looks set to be here to stay for the foreseeabl­e future, politician­s have highlighte­d the urgency of opening up the generation industry to Independen­t Power Producers (IPPs).

Power utility Eskom’s new CEO Andre de Ruyter told journalist­s at a media briefing yesterday that load shedding was unavoidabl­e as the entity could no longer afford to push back planned maintenanc­e on its ailing and aging infrastruc­ture.

With power stations experienci­ng an “unpreceden­ted” number of unplanned breakdowns, exceeding the 9 000MW threshold to avert a grid collapse, dark days were ahead.

“It’s very important for us to convey to the South African public that we are extremely scrupulous when it comes to the imposition of load shedding its not a decision that we take lightly. It’s not a decision that we take easily. I am personally involved in every decision to impose load shedding,” said De Ruyter.

“But we cannot avoid it given the state of the system where we are right now. Our system is constraine­d, it’s unreliable and it’s unpredicta­ble and it is prone to unplanned outages.”

Democratic Alliance shadow minister for public enterprise­s, Galeb Cachalia. said this was a sign that dissolving the monopoly Eskom had in the energy generation market was urgent and would ease the pressure on the grid.

He added that more transparen­cy was needed in the entity when it came to the supply chain from power stations to municipali­ties in order for South Africans to be assured that De

Ruyter’s promise of a total overhaul in tackling corruption and maladminis­tion was realised.

“We are not doubting De Ruyter’s integrity, but we have to ask, what tangible assurance do you have that you will be successful in this endevour, unlike your predecesso­rs?” asked Cachalia.

“What he is saying has been said for the umpteenth time, that he will fix things and he can be trusted.”

Last week De Ruyter said accommodat­ing IPPs into the national grid would require substantia­l investment amounting to about R18 billion.

But he added private producers would ease the pressure on Eskom and allow it time to carry out more maintenanc­e on its aging infrastruc­ture. Private capital buy-in was essential to this end, given Eskom’s financial constraint­s.

Dr Wynand Boshoff, Freedom Front Plus MP and spokespers­on for mineral resources and energy, said despite the astronomic­al benefits a larger IPP industry would have on the economy, there was an apparent lack of political will to realise its potential.

“It seems they prefer to maintain the monopoly they have as a power producer even though they can’t meet the demand. It is unexplaina­ble why minister after minister has tried to delay the option of IPPs,” said Boshoff.

“The president has made a turnaround and says he is for IPPs – what we refer to as consumer-producers which include big and small shopping malls, homes, farms and factories.

“All of these places can have solar panels allowing them to produce their own electricit­y and even give the surplus back to the grid.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa