The Citizen (KZN)

Miners’ funding squeeze tightens

OUT OF FAVOUR: LOSING OUT TO CLEANER INDUSTRIES

- Coal producers flounder

Environmen­tal, social and governance concerns are of growing importance to mining companies.

As global investors shift away from heavy industry in favour of cleaner sectors, mining companies are losing billions in financing, raising the cost of capital and jeopardisi­ng projects.

Making the mining industry more sustainabl­e by running mines on renewable energy, for example, will be a key focus at the annual Investing in African Mining Indaba conference in Cape Town this week, as companies hunt for new sources of capital including private equity, debt, offtake finance and royalty finance.

Environmen­tal, social and governance (ESG) concerns have driven money into specialise­d ESG funds which often exclude mining stocks among other “dirty” assets. “You talk to anyone at the moment, they say there’s no money,” said Boris Kamstra, executive director of Alphamin Resources, which manages the Bisie tin project in Democratic Republic

of Congo.

The capital squeeze that started about two years ago has worsened recently, said Julian Treger, CEO of Anglo Pacific Group, a mining royalty and streaming company.

The average cost of capital for early-stage mining projects rose by two percentage points over the past two years, he estimates.

“Even for companies that have good projects it’s very difficult for them to raise any money,” said Caroline Donally, managing director at private equity firm Denham Capital, in Houston. “Previous investors who would provide equity appear to have withdrawn. A number of specialist funds have shut, and generalist­s aren’t investing in commoditie­s anymore,” said Donally, who will be at Mining Indaba, which starts today.

Cannabis stocks and cryptocurr­encies are among alternativ­e assets that are luring retail investors away from miners.

Mining-specific private equity funds raised $0.3 billion last year, a fifth of the amount raised in 2009, and just barely more than the $0.2 billion raised in 2014 during a global commodity crash, data from Preqin shows.

Coal miners, especially those extracting thermal coal, for electricit­y, are bearing the brunt of the sustainabl­e investing trend. Norway’s sovereign wealth fund divested from all fossil fuel last year, and the world’s biggest asset manager Blackrock said on 14 January it would sell active holdings in companies generating more than 25% of revenues from thermal coal.

Thermal coal accounts for nearly 40% of the world’s electricit­y generation and more than 40% of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions, according to the Internatio­nal Energy Agency.

In Africa, where access to electricit­y is still a problem, coal-to-power projects could previously rely on support from developmen­t finance institutio­ns. But even they are withdrawin­g under pressure.

In November, the African Developmen­t Bank decided against funding a Kenya coal project. South Africa is also seeing funding dry up. Nedbank has stopped funding coal-related projects, while FirstRand cut greenfield thermal coal projects to less than 0.5% of its lending.

Capital squeeze ... has worsened

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa