The Citizen (KZN)

Gwede in hot water over move on nuke plan

- Eric Naki

Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe could be hauled before courts for attempting to revive the nuclear energy programme through the back door and in breach of last year’s court decision.

The department was accused by environmen­tal justice organisati­ons Earthlife Africa Johannesbu­rg (Earthlife) and the Southern African Faith Communitie­s’ Environmen­t Institute (SAFCEI) of doing what they undertook not to do in the High Court in Cape Town: to go ahead with the nuclear procuremen­t process unlawfully.

Now, Earthlife and SAFCEI are bracing themselves for yet another legal war again the department. The NGOs were alarmed after the department indicated in parliament­ary presentati­ons last month, its intention to issue a request for informatio­n (RFI), the first step in the procuremen­t process.

“Mantashe and the department will be acting in constructi­ve contempt of the judgment if they start the procuremen­t process for the proposed 2500MW new nuclear power programme,” the NGOs said.

The department confirmed it had given notice to members of the public to respond to its request for informatio­n and do so within a month. Earlier, Mantashe said the department planned to pursue the nuclear programme.

On Sunday, the department published the RFI, saying upfront planning was necessary for security of energy supply to society into the future.

“The RFI is intended to commence the department­al preparator­y work to develop plans for a future nuclear energy build programme. This is in line with the Integrated Resource Plan 2019 Decision 8, which states that the department will commence preparatio­ns for a nuclear build programme at a pace and scale that the country can afford because it is a no-regret option in the long term”.

This would enable the department to gain insight into the cost of the programme, possible ownership structures, cost recovery, the end-user cost and sustainabi­lity of the programme.

Earthlife and SAFCEI said they were alarmed by the department’s move which, they said, was in “clear breach” of the judgement in April 2017, that put breaks on former president Jacob Zuma’s controvers­ial nuclear deal. It was also against the undertakin­g given by former energy minister David Mahlobo in November, a month prior to the ANC elective conference, to comply with the judgment.

It was ruled that new nuclear procuremen­t could not start until such time as the minister made a lawful determinat­ion that new nuclear generation capacity is required and should be procured.

“In our view, the current minister of energy is also bound by this undertakin­g”.

The lawyers said the judgment also reinforced that the s34 decision-making process must be procedural­ly fair and that this would require meaningful public participat­ion prior to such a decision being made.

Earthlife’s Makoma Lekalaka said: “The Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear disasters remind us of the significan­t dangers of nuclear power. Nuclear power stations produce expensive electricit­y when the costs of nuclear fuel, constructi­on, radioactiv­e waste management and end-of-life decommissi­oning are factored in.

“Rather than burdening current and future generation­s with higher electricit­y costs, encourage more investment in agile renewable energy sources.”

Encourage investment in renewable energy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa