The Citizen (KZN)

Covid ‘used to cut jobs’

RETRENCHME­NTS: FIRMS STILL HAVE TO FOLLOW LAW, WARNS EXPERT

- Bernade e Wicks – bernadette­w@citizen.co.za

Some opportunis­tic employers using the pandemic as an excuse to get rid of ‘dead wood’.

The Commission for Conciliati­on, Mediation and Arbitratio­n (CCMA) has had its hands full in recent months and in August alone, recorded almost 3 000 retrenchme­nts. CCMA spokespers­on Amos Tshablala said yesterday the commission received a total of 1 034 retrenchme­nt referrals – and noted a total of 2 864 job losses – last month.

This as the Covid-19 pandemic continued to bear down on businesses across the country, leaving their owners with no choice but to cut their staff.

But, says a labour expert, some opportunis­tic employers have been using the pandemic as an excuse to get rid of “dead wood” – and this is against the law.

Advocate Tertius Wessels, the legal director at Strata-G Labour Solutions, said yesterday retrenchme­nts were “a major issue” right now. “There has not been a week gone by recently where we have not seen at least one big business announcing some form of restructur­ing,” he said.

And this looked set to continue, he said, with the long-term impact of the pandemic yet to be fully realised.

Wessels said the pandemic had brought with it “a slew of realisatio­ns for business owners”.

“One such an epiphany is how most organisati­ons need fewer employees to remain functional,” he said. “But the law is clear on employers using Covid-19 as an excuse to retrench people.”

Wessels said the same applied to employers firing staff who had been exposed to the virus or contracted it.

“In some cases, employers want to use that as a basis to terminate an employee’s services but being exposed to or contractin­g Covid-19 isn’t grounds for dismissal,” he said.

And he said the law was “very clear” insofar as the due process to be followed in those cases.

Wessels said even in cases where retrenchme­nts were as a legitimate result of the pandemic and an ensuing loss of income, due process had to be followed. “Even at a capacity level, when an employee is isolating at home and is not coming into work for 14 days, the employer does not have grounds to terminate that contract. They may have grounds if that employee refuses to return to work, citing Covid-19. In that case, it becomes about the capacity of that individual and what their employment contract stipulates,” he said.

“This goes even for companies that have closed shop as a result of Covid-19. They must adhere to legislatio­n with regards to dismissals.” Wessels said notifying staff a business was closing via text message, for example, left these individual­s and their families completely in the lurch.

In terms of the law, he went on, employees who had been unfairly dismissed were entitled to be reinstated with back pay or “re-employed” as new employees. Alternativ­ely, they could be entitled to compensati­on in the form of up to 12 months of their salary.

Law is clear on employers using Covid-19 as an excuse

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa