The Citizen (KZN)

Tariff hike applicatio­n

NERSA: WORRIED ABOUT IMPACT OF 15% INCREASE ON CONSUMERS

- Moneyweb

High court found Eskom tariffs for 2018/19 to be irrational and unlawful.

Eskom has submitted a R5.4 billion supplement­ary tariff applicatio­n to energy regulator Nersa, and for the first time it has also included interest – to the tune of R1.3 billion – in the applicatio­n.

This follows a high court order made by Judge Jody Kollapen in March, that found Nersa’s determinat­ion of Eskom’s tariffs for 2018/19 was irrational and unlawful. Kollapen set the determinat­ion aside.

At that stage Eskom’s R27 billion Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) applicatio­n was already before the regulator. The RCA is a risk-mitigating mechanism that provides for retrospect­ive adjustment­s – in favour of either Eskom or consumers – for revenue variations if assumption­s underlying the revenue determinat­ion play out differentl­y in reality.

Kollapen ordered that Eskom would, after the finalisati­on of the RCA, be allowed to bring a supplement­ary tariff applicatio­n, should it still be short of the revenue it was entitled to if Nersa had made the initial decision lawfully. He laid down certain principles to be followed in deciding this applicatio­n.

Nersa slashed Eskom’s RCA applicatio­n to R13 billion.

In its new applicatio­n Eskom says certain amounts it was entitled to, such as the R511 million it wanted for demand side management, it did not actually spend and is therefore no longer included in the outstandin­g amounts.

No option but to borrow

Other amounts were disallowed, and Eskom had no option but to borrow.

While the RCA makes no provision for the recovery of interest, Eskom argues that once the supplement­ary revenue has been determined, it should be compensate­d for the carrying cost incurred due to Nersa’s unlawful decision. “Only the interest cost, at a rate of 10% per annum compounded annually, is considered. The effect of inflation is not included”, it states.

Also included in the applicatio­n is R2.4 billion for employee cost. This comes after Nersa based its calculatio­n of prudent employee cost on Eskom’s generation function only, without proper considerat­ion of the business model that includes transmissi­on and distributi­on as well.

In its applicatio­n Eskom proposes that the R5.4 billion be added to the R13 billion RCA balance and the total R18.4 billion liquidated through increased tariffs next year.

This, Moneyweb understand­s, will go a long way to ensuring that Eskom gets R23 billion additional revenue next year, which translates to a 15% average tariff increase.

Nersa earlier approved a 5.22% average increase for next year.

Simple correction­s

Nersa must still reconsider three RCA decisions for 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17, and Eskom hopes that the balance to make up the R23 billion it wants can be found by simply correcting some obvious mistakes Nersa made when it first took these decisions.

During a meeting of Nersa’s electricit­y sub-committee last week, it was, however, clear that regulator members were concerned about the impact of a 15% tariff increase on consumers still trying to recover financiall­y from the Covid-19 lockdown.

 ?? Picture: Bloomberg ?? WORRY. Nersa is concerned about the impact of a tariff increase on consumers, who are still trying to recover financiall­y from the Covid-19 lockdown.
Picture: Bloomberg WORRY. Nersa is concerned about the impact of a tariff increase on consumers, who are still trying to recover financiall­y from the Covid-19 lockdown.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa