The Citizen (KZN)

Boardroom a tad yesteryear …

PROXY VOTING: FOR A FASHION GROUP, ITS APPROACH TO GOVERNANCE SEEMS OFF-TREND

- Ann Cro y

Foschini group’s board has been dominated by white males for decades.

For a company that seems to thrive in the world of fashion, its approach to governance seems remarkably old-fashioned – the boardroom profile of The Foschini Group (TFG) is more like something out of the 1980s than the 21st Century.

In its proxy voting note ahead of today’s AGM, non-government organisati­on Active Shareholde­r points out that not only has the board been dominated by white males for decades but that during financial 2020 the two additions to the board were both white and male.

“Although the social and ethics committee report talks of transforma­tion, it makes no mention of the fact that the board is not transforme­d,” said Active Shareholde­r. “These appointmen­ts may have been justified, but the social and ethics committee should have engaged with the issue.”

Former high-profile banker Colin Coleman and former chief executive Doug Murray were the two new appointmen­ts.

Active Shareholde­r, which advises labour and community-based investors on voting at shareholde­r meetings, isn’t overly concerned about the two new appointmen­ts. Where it sees things getting totally out of hand is the board’s remarkably loose definition of “independen­t”. On TFG’s own interpreta­tion, the only director who is described as not independen­t is the former CEO.

Tagged as “independen­t” in the group’s latest integrated annual report are Michael Lewis, Graham Davin, Sam Abrahams, Fatima Abrahams, David Friedland, Eddy Oblowitz, Nomahlubi Simamane and Ronnie Stein.

The King IV code says the independen­ce of a member who has served for longer than nine years should be assessed each year to ensure they are still independen­t. That assessment appears to involve nothing more than asking the director if they have applied their mind honestly on all matters presented to the board and have made decisions in the best interests of the company.

Only such a pointlessl­y lax assessment could regard Lewis as independen­t. He was appointed to the board, which his father previously controlled, back in 1989. Sam Abrahams has been on the board for 22 years and Fatima Abrahams for 17. Simamane has been a TFG director for 11 years and Oblowitz for 10.

For some reason the 2020 integrated annual report describes Stein as being appointed to the board in 2015 and therefore as being independen­t. But Active Shareholde­r points out that the group’s 2014 annual report states that Stein was appointed to the board in 1999. This means Coleman, Friedland and Tumi Makgabo-Fiskerstra­nd are the only directors of unquestion­able independen­ce.

Active Shareholde­r’s opposition may not achieve much given that as far back as 2015, the Public Investment Corporatio­n, then with a 16.5% stake in the company, voted against the re-election of Sam Abrahams because of his lack of independen­ce. But at least investors can’t say they weren’t warned.

 ?? Picture: Supplied ?? FASHION STATEMENT. Adding to concerns about a possible clubby atmosphere in the boardroom is the fact that three TFG directors were previously partners in the same audit firm.
Picture: Supplied FASHION STATEMENT. Adding to concerns about a possible clubby atmosphere in the boardroom is the fact that three TFG directors were previously partners in the same audit firm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa