The Herald (South Africa)

Koko ‘pressured staff’ to accept inferior coal

- Amil Umraw

Former Eskom chief executive Matshela Koko’s hidden hand in influencin­g his staff to do the bidding of the Gupta family and accept “reject coal” for its power stations was revealed at the state capture inquiry on Monday.

The commission heard testimony from former Eskom general manager for fuel sourcing, Johann Bester, and coal supply unit manager Gert Opperman.

They both alluded to undue influence from Koko in relation to contracts with Tegeta Exploratio­n and Resources, a company owned by the Gupta family.

Bester, in an emotional start to his testimony, spoke about the stress of serving in the position in 2014 and 2015, saying he had resigned from the utility because his wife threatened to leave him.

“She was aware of my unhappines­s and I would bring my unhappines­s home.”

Koko was the group executive for generation at the time.

Reading from his statement, advocate Kate Hofmeyr – who led his evidence – alleged Koko directly influenced one of his subordinat­es, Ayanda Ntetha.

“[There was] significan­t pressure and focus starting in 2015, an awareness that Ntetha was being engaged directly by Koko although she reported to you and you say Koko never directly put pressure on me [Bester], but he did put pressure on her,” Hofmeyr said, reading from Bester’s statement.

Opperman, who managed Eskom’s coal supply contract with the Brakfontei­n mine – owned by Tegeta – told the commission that after he rejected a consignmen­t of coal in 2015, Koko called him directly and asked him to reverse his decision.

Opperman said on September 7 2015, he received an email from mine general manager Satish Mudaliar which contained a report from the South African Bureau of Standards on the results of coal stockpile analysis.

Copied in the e-mail was Tegeta executive Jacques Roux.

“I was engaged by [Roux] to dispatch the stockpile to Majuba.

“One of the quality parameters did not meet the contractua­l specificat­ions.

“According to the contract this coal will now be termed reject coal,” Opperman said.

“As contract manager, I don’t have the authority to make a decision to dispatch it.

“I immediatel­y told him [Roux] you cannot dispatch this coal. I cannot support it.

“Roux was not pleased with my response.”

Opperman claims he received a call from Koko soon afterwards, asking “that I must please engage the Majuba power station to accept this product”.

“I then engaged my senior at the time, [Vuyisile] Ncube, and I asked him what must I do.

“He encouraged me to engage the power station.”

Opperman said he wrote to the power station instructin­g them to accept the consignmen­t, to which it agreed.

Hofemyr asked him if he usually received calls from Koko about precertifi­ed coal that had not met quality specificat­ions.

“No, it was not usual,” Opperman said.

Deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo, who chairs the commission, asked why Opperman complied with Koko’s instructio­n knowing it was wrong.

“My viewpoint from the onset was not to go along with it.

“That’s why I was firm when I told [Roux] we cannot move this coal.

“When I received this call, firstly, I was extremely surprised that Koko phoned me and then I get this instructio­n to do it.

“I think talking about Koko’s management style and the way he will threaten or talk to people, all of those things, in that moment in time, is part of your life.

“When you are in the corridor, you hear how people are treated, people go on suspension, other people get dismissed.”

Bester’s testimony will continue on Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa