The Independent on Saturday

Legal team may delay: expert

-

Legal expert Paul Hoffman said Zuma and his legal team would try anything to “duck, dive, delay and defect” the case so that he may never be asked to plead to the charges.

After the postponeme­nt yesterday, Hoffman said given the track record of Zuma’s legal team, he foresaw they would lodge a review proceeding in respect of the decision not to uphold Zuma’s representa­tions.

“They will appeal that if they lose. Then they will appeal that appeal at the Constituti­onal Court. They will exhaust every avenue to appeal and that will take about two to three years,” Hoffman said.

He said they would possibly apply to get a permanent stay of prosecutio­n and “rehash” everything which could push the matter for another three years.

“Then there will be a fight for who will pay Zuma’s legal fees. All this will delay the day Zuma is asked to plead to the charges,” he said.

Victim

In a different scenario, should Zuma be asked to plead sooner, Hoffman said his legal team would try to foster a deal that may result in some charges being dropped.

“If not a plea bargain, then they [legal team] will continue to throw sand in the gearbox of the judiciary system.”

Political analyst Professor Susan Booysen said Zuma yesterday again portrayed himself as a victim despite “milking the taxpayer for his legal costs”.

“The lasting impression of Zuma is that he is dishonest and disingenuo­us. He knows how to play the game and he should be the last person to speak about inequality before the law.

“He has milked the legal system and this is how he has elevated himself above the law.”

Booysen said Zuma made implicit threats and that he would continue to do this.

“He told his supporters ‘if I am prosecuted’ which means he will continue to play the game as long he has the legal funds to fight this and to find a way of getting off these charges.”

Political analyst Thabani Khumalo, said Zuma’s stance that the reinstatem­ent of the charges against him was politicall­y motivated was a form of self-contradict­ion as Zuma had, for years, said he was prepared to have his day in court to defend himself.

“He is using the same tactics that he used before 2009 by saying that he is being harrassed. The question is who is harassing him now,” Khumalo said.

He said Zuma was just playing the victim and trying to garner public sympathy by claiming there was a political conspiracy behind the charges and also blaming white monopoly capital as the source of all his troubles.

ANC spokespers­on Pule Mabe said despite comments made by individual­s outside court yesterday, they were sticking to the universall­y accepted principles of innocent until proven guilty.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa