The Mercury

It’s handling where the car really shines

-

Interestin­gly, and judging by looks alone, it seems the NA’s boot is actually fractional­ly bigger and it gets a tiny spare wheel where the ND gets a puncture repair kit.

I’ve had a 1991 model NA in my family for the past 15 years, and many of the subtle nuances I’ve become quite familiar with ring true in the ND.

The new MX-5 gets a manual gearbox with six speeds to the original’s five, but the lever’s short throw and clickity and ultrapreci­se H-pattern are pretty much identical. Its naturally-aspirated engine has grown to 2 litres from 1.6 (or 1.8), but it too sounds remarkably similar, and it delivers power in much the same way even if the new one’s output is much higher at 118kW and 200Nm.

I also couldn’t help but notice the same faint gear whine on overrun emanating from the transmissi­on tunnel, which also produces heat and warms driver’s left hand and knee in exactly the same way.

Even the interior light, which is renowned for its insufficie­nt brightness, is still too dim at night. Sure, some of these things might be accidental but I’d like to believe they were engineered in on purpose, and if so, kudos to Mazda for doing so.

Anyone who knows the first MX-5 will appreciate how easy it was to unlatch and stow its soft top, and designers have done a fine job to emulate the simple system. Actually, it’s even easier now with only one central latch to undo before tossing the lid rearward with one hand.

A strong forearm can now pull the roof back up from a seated position, where the old one required two hands from outside the car. I’d prefer to call the interior intimate rather than small, but some taller drivers might feel cramped especially without a reach adjustment for the steering wheel.

Instead of a cubby hole there’s now a small stowage space between the seats and Mazda’s done some clever work with clip- out cupholders which can be positioned between the seats or to the right of the passenger’s leg.

Everything is well placed ergonomica­lly and easy to use, and the central touchscree­n multimedia display is almost within a finger’s length of the gearlever. Unfortunat­ely, and as per most Japanese cars, its functional­ity is limited when the car’s moving. Performanc­e is right inside the realm of fun two-seat roadsters, and though it’ll never get your hairs on end like a Boxster or F-Type, keep in mind that this will be the most affordable convertibl­e sportscar on the market when it goes on sale here next month.

Its tail can be put out into a powerslide if you’re forceful with steering and throttle, but there’s not quite enough gusto at the rear wheels to keep it there.

It’s still reasonably brisk in a straight line, and at our test track it scored a best 0100km/h time of 7.9 seconds and covered the quarter-mile in 15.7.

What’s important here is that it’s quicker (by half a second) than Toyota’s more powerful but heavier 86 coupé in both of our tests.

But as you might expect, it’s handling where the MX-5 really shines, and its short wheelbase and wide track work hand in hand with an extremely sharp steering ratio to make for a great connection between driver and road. The 3.9 metre-long car darts left and right with small inputs, and 90-degree intersecti­on turns can be done with hands stuck on the wheel at 10-and-two positions. VERDICT Mazda has struck a nice balance between size, tech and newness with its latest MX-5. Its style might be a step too far from previous models for some purists, but the way it drives is bang on.

Pricing is yet to be confirmed but Mazda SA says we can bank on just under R400 000. Not bad considerin­g we’ll only get the highgrade model locally, which comes standard with Bose sound with headrest speakers, leather, Bluetooth connection­s, and the aforementi­oned touchscree­n display.

Follow me on Twitter @PoorBoyLtd

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? No reach adjustment for the steering. And taller drivers could find the cockpit a tad cramped.
No reach adjustment for the steering. And taller drivers could find the cockpit a tad cramped.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa