The Mercury

Emperor Zuma has no clothes

Our president’s arrogance was on full display in two instances this past week – yet he cannot see his naked shame

- Eusebius McKaiser

IT’S TEMPTING to laugh at President Jacob Zuma’s hubris. But that would be utterly irresponsi­ble, given the ruinous impact of his arrogance on our society.

Twice in the past week his arrogance was on full display, like an Emperor oblivious to his naked shame.

He told parliament­arians that he feels abused when he appears in the National Assembly.

He also called on all of us, especially the media, to desist from constructi­ng negative narratives when talking about the country.

Let’s examine these ludicrous claims each in their turn.

Abuse is what we as citizens suffer when the looting from the state continues unabated by Zuma and his cronies, who have a rapacious appetite.

Abuse is what hungry children in mud schools in the Eastern Cape experience when ghost civil servants are drawing salaries that were meant to pay for feeding schemes, transport systems and proper structures in which to learn to read and write, on a full tummy.

Abuse is what the poor experience on the wrong side of the inefficien­cy divide in cities marred by apartheid geography and grossly inadequate­ly serviced communitie­s.

Abuse is what we all experience when a president fails to remember his own nine-point plan to stave off an economic recession so that we may yet experience economic growth conducive to job creation and poverty alleviatio­n.

Abuse is what we feel when a president sits in Parliament chuckling nervously and awkwardly, or maybe confidentl­y – we can only guess which it is in the absence of his ability and willingnes­s to construct compelling arguments about what he thinks – instead of taking responsive government seriously.

An abuse of the word “abuse” is what one sees when a grown man with enormous constituti­onal, political and material powers and privileges pretends that the odd appearance in the National Assembly with a partisan Speaker shielding him counts as abuse.

That’s not abuse, Mr President. That’s what one colloquial­ly calls, “taking the piss!”

The same disingenui­ty applies to the laughable appeal that we keep the sunny side up when it comes to public narratives about our country.

No, Mr President, it’s not sunshine journalism that will prevent us from being downgraded by ratings agencies. It’s good governance that will. Truth, not lies, will set us free from your dangerous grip.

So, effectivel­y asking us all to lie about the hard truths about our democracy won’t cut it. For one thing, truth is impossible to hide in a time of new media, and social media in particular.

Transparen­cy is no longer a normative plea from citizens to their states the world over. It’s now, mercifully, an indelible feature of modernity because technology makes it impossible to stop the flow of informatio­n.

This means that the world can see what’s going on here regardless of what Hlaudi Motsoeneng chooses to broadcast or not at the SABC.

Not even the state security cluster can subvert truth for too long. It can simply delay the lid blowing off. But lids blow off. So don’t bask in your hubris too comfortabl­y.

Asking us to deliberate­ly subvert awkward and embarrassi­ng truths about the state of the state, the state of our leadership, and the state of

Abuse is what we feel when a president sits in Parliament chuckling nervously

our democracy in general, is bloody cheeky.

Because, let’s be honest (even if that’s not your forté), asking us to collude in manufactur­ing rosy narratives is really a request that we ignore your ruinous leadership, Mr President.

It would be imprudent on the part of active citizens and democrats, and poor journalist­ic form from the media, if we did so. Not least because your definition of “negative” is “truth”.

The only thing to be said in pseudo-mitigation of the hubris of Zuma is that he is not the only one responsibl­e for how we got to this point.

The more accurate fuller story of the troubled waters we are wading through is a story of the failure of the ANC to provide organisati­onal leadership and oversight over Zuma.

That in turn means that the solution is more complex than recalling Zuma, pronto.

Our democracy will be under enormous pressure for as long as the ANC, qua organisati­on, refuses to renew or reinvent itself.

The opposition parties must be very excited about 2019 already.

McKaiser is an author and a political commentato­r

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa