The Mercury

Break-in an attack on judiciary

- Mayibongwe Maqhina

‘WE KNOW where you live.” This is the implied threat opposition parties and NGOs fear could be behind an audacious burglary at the offices of the Chief Justice in Midrand on Saturday.

Fifteen computers were taken from the human resources section of the offices containing sensitive details of all judges, including their home addresses.

The break-in follows two landmark rulings last week against Hawks head Mthandazo Berning Ntlemeza and Social Developmen­t Minister Bathabile Dlamini.

The Council for the Advancemen­t of the South African Constituti­on (Casac) said it was deeply disturbed by the break-in.

“The burglary took place after a period in which the courts have upheld the constituti­on and the law in the face of executive disdain for due process and the rule of law,” Casac executive secretary Lawson Naidoo said.

He noted the recent judgments that were delivered against the government, including setting aside the appointmen­t of Ntlemeza.

“This inevitably raises suspicions about political motives for the burglary. We therefore cannot simply treat this as another routine crime in pursuit of economic gain in a society in which such events are unfortunat­ely far too commonplac­e.” Naidoo said it appeared that the timing of the assault on the judiciary was intended to intimidate and sow fear among the judges of courts.

“It has the hallmarks of being a carefully orchestrat­ed operation that is more usually associated with a repressive state in which the rule of law is deliberate­ly trampled upon,” he said.

The official opposition did not mince its words in linking the break-in to the damning judgment delivered against Dlamini, her Department of Social Developmen­t and South African Social Security Agency on Friday.

“Like the robbery at the Helen Suzman Foundation, almost a year ago exactly, the DA views this as an act of intimidati­on,” spokespers­on Glynnis Breytenbac­h said.

“It is highly suspicious that the break-in occurred the day after the Constituti­onal Court handed down a damning judgment in which they were highly critical of Minister of Social Developmen­t Bathabile Dlamini and the social grants crisis she has manufactur­ed,” Breytenbac­h said.

She said attacks on the judiciary could not be allowed to stand and should be dealt with the urgency and seriousnes­s they deserved.

The statements by the DA and Casac were made a day after the ANC lashed out at DA chief whip John Steenhuise­n for suggesting on social media that State Security Minister David Mahlobo could be involved. “My money’s on Mahlobo and the cack-handed SSA (State Security Agency) signal jammer, imaginary social media villains and inept breakins. Intimidati­on of judiciary,” Steenhuise­n wrote on Twitter.

ANC spokesman Zizi Kodwa accused Steenhuise­n of making “wild, untested allegation­s impugning individual­s without a shred of evidence to back it up” .

“The ANC directs Steenhuise­n and his ilk to present to the relevant authoritie­s and South Africans at large evidence he is relying on to draw inferences and make allegation­s against Minister of Intelligen­ce Comrade David Mahlobo in this matter,” Kodwa said, before demanding that Steenhuise­n make an unconditio­nal apology.

Police Minister Nkosinathi Nhleko said the break-in should not threaten the independen­ce of the judiciary, according to his spokesman Sandile Ngidi.

“Minister Nhleko views this act of criminalit­y in a serious light and has impressed upon the acting national commission­er of police Lieutenant-General Khomotso Phahlane to ensure that the special investigat­ion team working on the case work around the clock to bring the perpetrato­rs of this heinous crime to book,” Ngidi said.

“This act must not weaken or threaten South Africa’s independen­t judiciary since it’s one of the central pillars of our democracy.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa