The Mercury

Schools pregnancy policy draft ‘vague’

- Karen Singh

THE Equal Education Law Centre and Section27 have criticised the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy in Schools national draft policy for being vague regarding implementa­tion and for having glaring omissions.

The two bodies said it appeared that the policy focused on how pupil pregnancy impacted on government planning rather than on defining the right of pregnant pupils to access basic education.

Yesterday marked the closing of the second round of public comments for the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy in Schools policy.

The draft policy – gazetted at the beginning of the year – aims to reduce the incidence of pupil pregnancy through education.

“This policy seeks to ensure the accessible provision of informatio­n on prevention; choice of terminatio­n of pregnancy; care, counsellin­g and support; frameworks for impact mitigation; and guidelines for systemic management and implementa­tion,” reads the policy.

In a joint statement the Equal Education Law Centre and Section27 said there were several problems that had been identified with the policy.

They included the policy’s failure to outline measures to be taken during pregnancy and after delivery to ensure that pupils return to school.

The policy was also inconsiste­nt regarding who was eligible to access pregnancy prevention services, quality comprehens­ive sexual education and sexual reproducti­ve health services. The organisati­ons also said the policy was silent on the protection of the rights of pupils who became fathers, perpetuati­ng existing societal prejudice that child rearing was the sole responsibi­lity of the female pupils.

In response, Department of Basic education spokespers­on Elijah Mhlanga said there should be no exclusion of pregnant pupils.

They must be allowed to remain in school during their pregnancie­s and return as soon after giving birth as was possible.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa