The Mercury

Land redistribu­tion greater than we believe

-

IF THE response of the Minister of Rural Developmen­t and Land Reform Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, to a question tabled by Freedom Front leader Dr Pieter Groenewald MP, was widely published, then distortion of the facts concerning land reform and ownership, which is serving to fuel emotions and populist agendas, would diminish.

Central to the debate on the issue is the claim that whites still own 72% of agricultur­al holdings and

that only 4% are in black hands.

But as an analysis in Politcsweb on January 8 points out, those statistics are disingenuo­us because of the context in which they are presented.

The contrast of 72% to 4% holdings refers to individual­ly owned, non-urban classes of land.

As statistics they exclude all

state-owned land, community-held former homeland territory and land privately purchased by blacks through trusts, companies and close corporatio­ns. The minister’s response noted that 12.1million hectares had been transferre­d in terms of land restitutio­n – 3.5million directly to beneficiar­ies; 2.9 million concerned those who opted for financial

compensati­on; 4.9million acquired by the government for distributi­on along with a further 822388ha.

What is missing from that statement is that, at the outset, the ANC inherited 16millionh­a of the former homeland territorie­s.

Thus, the extent of land restitutio­n and redistribu­tion between 1994 and 2017, although pedestrian-paced, is actually greater than what is commonly believed.

DUNCAN DU BOIS | Bluff

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa