The Mercury

Rememberin­g Louis Botha 100 years on

There are similariti­es between challenges he faced and those South Africa faces today

- DUNCAN DU BOIS Du Bois is an independen­t post-doctoral researcher

ON AUGUST 27, 1919, General Louis Botha, South Africa’s first prime minister, died at the age of 57.

In the preface to his recent biography of Botha, Richard Steyn noted that nowadays memories of such figures are focused “more on apportioni­ng blame for historical injustices than making allowances for the times and circumstan­ces in which [they] lived”.

Born near Greytown, Natal, in 1862, Botha received little education. Despite being untrained in military matters, he earned praise as a leader during the Anglo-Boer War. As with his fellow Afrikaners, he had to come to terms with the consequenc­es of defeat – the loss of Boer independen­ce, the devastatio­n of Boer farms and communitie­s, the deaths of more than 26000 Boer women and children in British concentrat­ion camps.

Critical to his path as South Africa’s first prime minister was Botha’s role as the conciliato­r of his own Afrikaner people – healing the breach between those who had sided with the British and the bittereind­ers who resented the terms of the Treaty of Vereenigin­g which ended the war. The founding of Het Volk (The People) by Botha and Jan Smuts served to unite the Afrikaner volk and to strive for self-government in the Transvaal. It also became the platform from which they promoted the unificatio­n of South Africa.

Despite their fears of Afrikaner domination, Botha proved popular with the Natal delegates at the first meeting of the National Convention on South African union in Durban in November 1908. Years later, in recognitio­n of his role as conciliato­r, Durban became the first city to erect a statue in Botha’s honour. When it came to choosing South Africa’s first prime minister, Governor-General Gladstone had little hesitation in selecting Louis Botha. Botha enjoyed widespread support, particular­ly in Natal.

The inaugurati­on of the Union of South Africa in 1910 brought challenges: forging Afrikaner-English unity divided by the recent war; establishi­ng a civil service to combine and administer the four provinces; seeking a balance between Boer agrarian interests and the Rand mining industries; maintainin­g imperial ties while trying to accommodat­e strident Afrikaner nationalis­t elements led by Boer war general JBM Hertzog; and issues concerning Africans and Indians.

Steyn notes that Botha “took seriously the promise he had made to bear the interests of South Africa’s ‘native’ population in mind”. Thus, it is significan­t that one of his first acts as premier reflected his Natal roots: he ordered the release of his old acquaintan­ce, Dinuzulu, the Zulu king who was serving a four-year sentence imposed by the Natal government after a controvers­ial trial for alleged involvemen­t in the Bhambatha rebellion.

Botha saw to it that Dinuzulu was given a pension and he lived till his death in 1913 on a farm near Middelburg. Unfortunat­ely, Botha’s favour towards Dinuzulu did not find wider expression.

Like most white leaders of that time, he believed in racial segregatio­n and the setting aside of land areas for exclusive black occupation. Significan­tly, what became the 1913 Land Act grew out of the “Native policy” proposals of Lord Milner’s Lagden Commission of 1903-1905.

Botha regarded the Land Act as reasonable and necessary. But as history has demonstrat­ed, its legacy proved unrealisti­c and hurtful resulting in the loss of black land and marginalis­ation of blacks’ security of tenure.

Another unfortunat­e shortcomin­g was Botha’s failure to appreciate the strength of Afrikaner nationalis­m. His noble intentions of reconcilia­tion were premature at a time of Afrikaner anxiety over their political, language and cultural future within the anglicised British Empire. The fissure in Botha’s reconcilia­tion policy became an irreparabl­e fracture in 1912 when Hertzog demanded separate cultural developmen­t of English and Afrikaans.

His breakaway from Botha’s South African Party to form the National Party (NP) in 1914 put paid to Botha’s reconcilia­tion policy. In the 1915 election, 40% of Botha’s Afrikaner support defected to Hertzog’s NP.

The years 1913 and 1914 produced severe challenges to Botha’s government. The first of two strikes by white miners erupted into looting and arson which saw the offices of The Star newspaper burnt down. Without an army to quell the strikers, Botha and Smuts were forced to accept the miners’ demands.

A more difficult challenge concerned the Indian community. Restrictio­ns on their movement within South Africa, the £3 tax on ex-indentured Indians who refused to return to India and the non-recognitio­n of Hindu and Muslim marriages were long-standing grievances which, it was anticipate­d, would be settled by the Immigratio­n Act of 1913. Indian dismay at the failure of this act to remedy their grievances triggered mass protests. Gandhi was imprisoned for encouragin­g these.

The outbreak of World War I in August 1914 brought about the greatest crisis of Botha’s premiershi­p. Opposition to South Africa’s participat­ion in the war against Germany mutated into armed rebellion by 11500 Afrikaners that cost 322 lives.

Nonetheles­s, Botha’s military tactics in the Union Defence Force offensive against German-occupied South West Africa resulted in victory by June 1915. Characteri­stically, he was magnanimou­s in victory. Commenting on his settlement terms to the defeated Germans, the London Times described them as “generous to a fault”.

Politicall­y, Botha’s last years were harrowing as he doggedly pursued a path between the imperialis­m of the Unionist party and the sectionali­sm of Hertzog’s NP. Those burdens caused Botha’s health to deteriorat­e. Despite poor health, he insisted on joining Smuts at the Paris peace conference which commenced in January 1919. Thus South Africa recorded its first participat­ion on the internatio­nal stage.

More importantl­y, however, Botha and Smuts succeeded in gaining respect for and recognitio­n of South Africa’s status as an independen­t entity within the British Empire.

Drawing on his experience of having been a defeated foe, Botha appealed to the delegates to show clemency towards Germany. “You must not take vengeance on a whole people and punish them so as to make it impossible for them to recover,” he advised. During his return voyage to South Africa after an absence of eight months, he suffered a heart attack and died in Pretoria on August 27, 1919.

Significan­tly, there are similariti­es in some of the challenges that confront South Africa today. Reconcilia­tion is being poisoned by the anti-white racism of Malema and the BLF. In 1919 it was frustrated by the sectional ideology of Hertzog. The future of minority groups is more uncertain today than in 1919. The land issue was no more settled in 1919 than it is today.

‘You must not take vengeance on a whole people and punish

them.’

GENERAL LOUIS BOTHA

 ??  ?? FARMER, warrior, statesman, Louis Botha was a man of the people, who had the formidable task of establishi­ng a unitary state in the wake of a divisive conflict, says the writer.
FARMER, warrior, statesman, Louis Botha was a man of the people, who had the formidable task of establishi­ng a unitary state in the wake of a divisive conflict, says the writer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa