The Mercury

Sanef’s move to force the PIC’s hand fully exposed

- SIZWE DLAMINI sizwe.dlamini@inl.co.za locus standi

A RECENT move by the SA National Editors Forum (Sanef) to try and force the Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC) to execute a hostile takeover of Independen­t Media is largely driven by former members of the Press Council working with a minister and two former ministers.

In its letter, Sanef asked the PIC to ringfence the newsrooms of the Independen­t Media titles by introducin­g a “Chinese wall” between management and the editors of the titles.

Sources within this grouping – which revolves around several Sanef officials, senior former journalist­s and members of the Thuma Mina media group – said desperatio­n and panic had set in as a result of perceived loss of support in the ANC for President Cyril Ramaphosa.

The grouping is astounded by the strength of the anti-Ramaphosa camp in the ANC and fear that, should a special conference be called, Ramaphosa could be recalled as the president of the ANC reminiscen­t of what happened to former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma. Social media is abuzz with a list of possible top six from different camps within the ANC, all of which exclude Ramaphosa and his supporters.

This grouping, which includes PIC spokespers­on Adrian Lackay – who is linked as an associate of Public Enterprise­s Minister Pravin Gordhan, sees the recent editorial changes at Independen­t Media as problemati­c for Ramaphosa as the editors at Independen­t Media have exposed the CR17 campaign funding and PPE corruption, especially allegedly by Ramaphosa spokespers­on Khusela Diko. The source referred to how Independen­t Media exposed the PPE corruption, while other media sympatheti­c to Ramaphosa ignored it for almost two weeks until they were forced to report on the grand scale of the PPE corruption.

The group hatched a plan which Independen­t Media has seen and has confirmed. There are individual­s working to influence the State Capture Commission’s narrative against Independen­t Media by deliberate­ly singling out African News Agency (ANA) as a recipient of funding from the State Security Agency (SSA). ANA confirmed this and indicated that the funding was for services rendered. In what was unusual, evidence leader advocate Paul Pretorius urged on Dr Sydney Mufamadi to disclose the name of ANA and even claimed that the director-general had given clearance for this.

Many who had an agreement with the SSA, including journalist­s from other media companies, did not have their names disclosed because the commission would first have to seek permission from those media houses and journalist­s. No such permission was sought from ANA. The plan of the group was to immediatel­y use journalist­s in the Thuma Mina group – especially from Daily Maverick and News24 – who together within the space of one week published nine articles in a synchronis­ed manner on ANA and the SSA. Soon after the revelation at the state capture commission, Sanef released a pre-planned statement without consulting Independen­t Media, falsely claiming that ANA was part of Independen­t Media and condemning Independen­t Media and its journalist­s.

Its editors responded forcefully. Sanef, however, did not leave it there. According to sources within Sanef, there was deep division within the volunteer organisati­on of journalist­s when its executive wrote to the PIC, ostensibly to protect journalism. In the letter to the PIC, Sanef was setting the ground for the PIC to intervene in Independen­t Media. Coincident­ally, on the same day as the first letter, the PIC put in a summons against Independen­t Media.

The amateur way in which this was contrived is easy for the public to see. Independen­t Media’s executive chairman and editors separately wrote a scathing response condemning the interferen­ce as Sanef had no in this matter. The Independen­t Media investigat­ion unit can reveal that the minister and former ministers did not involve just the PIC, but are also working with two banks as a last-ditch effort to shut down the accounts of the Sekunjalo Group, a shareholde­r of Independen­t Media, a move expected to render Independen­t Media unable to trade or operate.

The plan was to use the ANA-SSA matter as a pretext for the banks to shut down the accounts of Sekunjalo on the back of reputation­al exposure. Over the next few weeks, Independen­t Media will expose more of the dirty tricks campaign by this grouping, which includes former members of the Press Council.

Independen­t Media executive chairman Dr Iqbal Survé said that the company would release a detailed statement

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa