Climate change will worsen conflict in poor communities
Changes to the natural environment put pressure on social, political systems
AS THE world recognised World Water Day on March 22, we have to acknowledge that the current climate crisis is also a water crisis. Even though the impacts of climate change on the water cycle will vary regionally, the water crisis needs to be seen as an entry point for conflict.
Africa is responsible for a mere 4% of global carbon dioxide emissions, yet it is disproportionately vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.
According to the US Agency for International Development (USAID), more than half of the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are among those most affected by the burden of climate exposure.
As a result, the continent is grappling with multiple climate-related security risks such as forced migration and displacement, livelihood insecurity, food and water scarcity, rising levels of intercommunal conflict and protracted cross-border resource conflicts.
Across the continent, mediators, community leaders and other conflict resolution actors are increasingly aware of the risks and challenges posed by the negative consequences of climate change on habitats and natural resources.
They see that changes to the natural environment put pressure on social, economic and political systems.
The increasing stresses on resources through environmental threats and growing populations have overburdened weak states and aggravated fragile situations.
In areas with poor governance or existing tensions, rising scarcity and competition can escalate into conflict.
Although it is known that conflict and climate change are among the most important issues of our time, governments and many international institutions have been slow to recognise how the two are linked.
In February 2019 the African Union adopted the ground-breaking African Union Transitional Justice Policy (AUTJP), which works “as a continental guideline for AU Member States to develop their own context-specific comprehensive policies, strategies and programmes towards democratic and socio-economic transformation, and achieving sustainable peace, justice, reconciliation, social cohesion and healing”.
The policy addresses the root causes of conflict and contributes to the creation of sustainable peace, accountability, social justice and transformative democratic and socio-economic reform.
Despite the AUTJP being a transformative policy, it failed to address the climate change issue let alone recognising it as a serious contributor to conflict.
Another objective of the AUTJP is to enhance social cohesion and nation building. This will be difficult to achieve without a deliberate focus on
climate change, because climate change impacts put stress on social cohesion.
When they affect people’s access to natural resources they rely on – such as water, timber and land for crops – it strains relations within and across social groups.
This is especially the case in predominantly growing economies, with histories of conflict or governance challenges. Social cohesion is the glue that holds society together. When things get tough, that glue weakens and the risk of conflict increases.
Failure to consider the growing impacts of climate change will undermine the continent’s efforts at conflict prevention, peacebuilding and sustaining peace.
This risks trapping vulnerable countries in a vicious cycle of climate disaster and conflict.
It is therefore crucial that we shift the narrative now and move beyond just having a general knowledge about climate change and focus on understanding climate change in different dimensions that stand in the way of peacebuilding.
By doing this, we can use this understanding to inform appropriate responses that can help transform conflict and work towards building peace which can withstand the impacts of our changing climate.
On various programming, civil society organisations need to have a conflict lens when considering climate change and similarly, a climate lens when discussing conflict.
They need to bring climate change into the training and workshops in communities affected by conflict for them to start understanding the impact of climate change.
Going forward, human rights institutions that have it as their mandate to ensure that human rights of peoples are promoted, protected and fulfilled, need to recognise that climate change
represents a major threat to human rights.
They must educate people by linking peace education and human rights education to climate change education.
Findings from Afrobarometer’s latest round of public-opinion surveys across Africa show a keen awareness of climate change in some countries but only about three in 10 (28%) are fully “climate change literate”. This highlights the need to build public knowledge around the issue.
On financing, funding streams need to be flexible enough for climate security risks to be integrated into programming by civil society institutions.
Currently, and problematically so, available funding does not enable organisations to mainstream climate change similarly to how gender has been integrated into peacebuilding work.
To develop and successfully implement climate change-sensitive peacebuilding projects, donors and funders should fund research and interventions that address these linkages.
Recognition of climate change as a threat – not only to the stability of ecological systems which have sustained human life for thousands of years but also to the rights of those living today – enables the rise of a new paradigm of environmental co-operation in which progressive and ambitious action on climate change should be central to conflict prevention and human rights protection strategies.
Moreover, where existing international and regional frameworks have insufficient scope to protect those affected by the impacts of climate change, regulatory measures and precedents must be established and then rigorously and equitably enforced.