The Mercury

Small hope for Iran nuclear deal

-

WESTERN officials have largely lost hope that the Iran nuclear deal can be resurrecte­d, sources familiar with the matter said, forcing them to weigh how to limit Iran’s atomic programme even as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has divided the big powers.

While they have not completely given up on the pact, under which Iran restrained its nuclear programme in return for relief from economic sanctions, there is a growing belief it may be beyond salvation.

“They are not yanking the IV out of the patient’s arm ... but I sense little expectatio­n that there is a positive way forward,” said one source, who like others quoted spoke on condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivit­y.

Four Western diplomats echoed the sentiment that the deal – which Iran struck with Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the US in 2015 but which then-US president Donald Trump abandoned in 2018 – is withering away.

The pact appeared on the brink of revival in early March when the EU, which co-ordinates the talks, invited ministers to Vienna to seal the deal. But talks were thrown into disarray over last-minute Russian demands and whether Washington might remove the Islamic Revolution­ary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its Foreign Terrorist Organizati­on (FTO) list.

The IRGC controls elite armed and intelligen­ce forces that Washington accuses of a global terrorist campaign.

Tehran’s demand to remove it from the list is opposed by many US lawmakers, who see it as a terrorist entity despite Iranian denials.

Russian demands appear to have been finessed but the IRGC designatio­n has not, with the impending November 8 US mid-term elections making it hard for US President Joe Biden to buck domestic opposition to remove it.

Biden’s aides have made clear they have no plans to drop the IRGC from the list but have not ruled it out, saying if Tehran wants Washington to take such a step beyond strict revival of the deal, named the Joint Comprehens­ive Plan of Action (JCPOA) then Iran must address US concerns outside the deal.

“If they’re not prepared to drop extraneous demands, continue to insist on lifting the FTO, and refuse to address our concerns that go beyond the JCPOA then, yes, we’re going to reach an impasse that is probably not going to be surmountab­le,” said a senior US official.

So far, Iran seems unwilling to budge on the FTO removal. “That is our red line and we will not cave on that,” said an Iranian security official.

Neither side wants to admit nearly a year of indirect talks may have failed, several sources said, with Washington hoping Iran might drop its IRGC demand and Iran convinced it can revive the deal whenever it wants.

As a result, events may drift, with the world focused on the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting oil price spike allowing Iran to earn more from its illicit oil exports that evade US sanctions.

“I don’t think anybody wants to say enough is enough,” said a Western diplomat. This could allow Iran to keep expanding its nuclear programme, which it accelerate­d after Trump abandoned the deal. Washington believes

Iran is within weeks of obtaining fissile material for one nuclear weapon if it chose. Iran has long rejected seeking nuclear weapons.

Despite talk of a US “Plan B” to address Iran’s nuclear programme if the deal cannot be revived, there are few good options.

Short of US or Israeli military action to destroy Iranian nuclear sites, the main lever big powers have is to cut Iran’s oil exports. While Washington won the tacit support of Moscow and Beijing to curb Iranian exports via US sanctions in the years before the 2015 deal, there is no such consensus among the big powers.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine despite US and European warnings show Moscow’s assent cannot be taken for granted. China is the chief buyer of illicit Iranian oil and the sources said getting it to cut back will be tough.

Asked previously about its purchase of Iranian oil in violation of US sanctions, China’s foreign ministry reiterated Beijing’s opposition to US extraterri­torial sanctions and urged the US to remove its unilateral sanctions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa