The Rep

High court interdicts attorney

Mostert labelled ‘danger to public’

- GCINA NTSALUBA

Aprominent Komani attorney, the son of late respected lawyer Francois Johannes Mostert, or “Mossie” as he was fondly known, has been interdicte­d from practising by the Makhanda high court pending the finalisati­on of a disciplina­ry case brought against him by the Eastern Cape Provincial Legal Practition­ers Council (LPC).

Francois Andre Mostert, 38, who is the sole director of Francois Andre Mostert Inc, could also face imprisonme­nt for up to two years if found guilty for contraveni­ng section 33 of the Legal Practition­ers Act (LPA) for practising without a Fidelity Fund certificat­e, a key requiremen­t for all legal practition­ers, prior to the registrati­on of his law firm by the LPC on April 12 2022.

He was labelled as a “danger to the public” by the LPC after he allegedly duped a number of Komani residents and business owners who were left high and dry on empty promises.

According to the Act, any person who contravene­s the provisions of section 33 is liable to a conviction, or a fine or to imprisonme­nt for a period not exceeding two years, or both.

“The first and second respondent [Mostert and the law firm] are hereby interdicte­d and prohibited from practising as an attorney of this honourable court, pending the issuing of a valid Fidelity Fund certificat­e by the applicant,” judge Bulelwa Pakati said in the court order.

The judge also ordered that Mostert’s disciplina­ry hearing start on October 18 2022, something which his family described as a “disgrace” to the family name and to his father’s legacy as an ethical lawyer.

Mostert was interdicte­d and prohibited from operating his trust account(s) and the curator was appointed to take over the administra­tion of the accounts.

According to the LPC, which regulates the legal profession in the public interest, Mostert had not been issued with a valid Fidelity Fund certificat­e before registerin­g his firm and therefore was not allowed to practise.

“Prior to registerin­g his own practice, he was on the roll of nonpractis­ing attorneys as from October 1 2020 and therefore he was not required to be in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificat­e as required in terms of section 84 of the Legal Practice Act, No 28 of 2014 the LPA],” said LPC spokespers­on Kabelo Letebele.

He said Mostert was admitted to practise as an attorney on January 18 2009 and had practised as a profession­al assistant, and was not required to be in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificat­e.

Letebele said the purpose of the Fidelity Fund certificat­e was to ensure the interests of clients were protected, safeguardi­ng them from pecuniary loss due to theft of their monies or property entrusted to practising members of the legal profession.

“When it became clear to the LPC that Mostert was indeed practising, which he continued to deny, high court proceeding­s for an order in terms of which he was interdicte­d from practising pending the finalisati­on and outcome of the disciplina­ry proceeding­s were authorised by the Eastern Cape Provincial Council, and the required relief was granted by the Eastern Cape Division, Makhanda, on September 6 2022,” he said.

Letebele said any legal practition­er who practised without being in possession of a Fidelity Fund certificat­e was a danger to the public.

Local resident Bobby Lottering, who was allegedly misled by Mostert, hired him to submit a Road Accident Fund (RAF) claim in July 2020 after a motor vehicle accident.

“Francois said he will do the RAF for me. In November 2021 he borrowed R50,000 from me, promising to pay it back the next week,” Lottering said.

“This payment only happened five weeks later after many phone calls.

“He promised me that he should have an offer from the RAF early 2022. Nothing happened. He then sent me with a letter in June from his office to go and see Dr Rall in Bloemfonte­in.

“No-one from Rose Park Hospital knew anything about this.”

Not long after this, Mostert allegedly phoned him to say the RAF had sent him an offer of R4m, for which Lottering signed the offer of acceptance in his office.

“My wife received a voice note from Francois in July saying the Eagle had landed. Meaning that the money had been paid.

“He sent me two proof of payments that I requested from him as the money was not showing in my account,” explained Lottering.

He said: “He even sent me an SMS showing that R4m was paid. We were notified by ABSA, after emailing this to them, that the proof of payment was fraudulent. Francois denied this, even in front of the branch manager.

“He then admitted to me that he had not yet received the funds but was hoping to receive them soon.”

To rub salt in the wound, when Lottering’s wife phoned the RAF, she was told no claim had been lodged under their name.

According to a source in the legal fraternity, incidents such as this are more common than people realise.

“The public must be aware of who their attorney is and if needs be contact the Legal Practice Council to confirm their attorney is properly registered with them before paying for services.

“The LPC also needs to take a firmer hand with attorneys who flagrantly disregard the rules,” he said.

Another victim, a business owner in the property market, described his encounter with Mostert as an “unfortunat­e experience” after a fallout which went as far as the Makhanda high court.

“I would prefer to make no comment other than to say that it has been an unfortunat­e experience,” he said.

Detailed questions were sent to Mostert on Tuesday but he had not replied by the time of going to press. Attempts to reach him on his mobile phone were unsuccessf­ul.

The LPC declined to comment to The Rep.

He even sent me an SMS showing R4m was paid. We were notified by ABSA, after emailing this to them, that the proof of payment was fraudulent. He denied this in front of the branch manager.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa