The Star Early Edition

Post-retirement dismissal examined

The dismissal of elderly employees is likely to raise emotions as they usually need the income

-

DISMISSALS that occur after normal retirement age present employers with a specific set of circumstan­ces that differ markedly from all other forms of dismissal.

Section 187(2)(b) of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) states that a dismissal based on age is fair if the employee concerned has reached the normal or agreed retirement age for people in the organisati­on employed in that capacity.

Predictabl­y, the Commission for Conciliati­on, Mediation and Arbitratio­n (CCMA) has on several occasions been required to conciliate and adjudicate on disputes relating to post-retirement age dismissals.

The dismissal of an employee who is employed beyond normal retirement date does in fact constitute a dismissal per se.

It is, however, deemed to be a terminatio­n of the contract of employ-

She added that the allegedly unfair age discrimina­tion had also amounted to an automatica­lly unfair dismissal.

The commission­er disagreed with the employee stating in the arbitratio­n award that Section 187 of the LRA provided for post retirement-age dismissal.

This issue was further addressed in the CCMA arbitratio­n matter of Freda Theunette Maritz v Pepps Mokopane Primary School terminated where the employee has reached his/her normal retirement age (see Harris v Bakker & Steyger 1993 14 ILJ 1553).

“Although I accept that in terms of Section 186(a) of the LRA of 1995, the employer dismissed the employee, I am however of the view that this was a normal terminatio­n of the employee’s employment by effluxion of time,” the commission­er said, and went on to quote Section 187(2)(b) of the LRA.

The dismissal of elderly employees is always likely to raise emotions, particular­ly when such employees are compelled to work to sustain themselves.

Up until recently, it was not uncommon for the employment of post-retirement age employees to come under threat during retrenchme­nt exercises.

A mandatory retirement age cannot be introduced, or enforced, by an employer without the employee’s consent.

Predictabl­y, employees must be fully consulted when a decision is to be made in the absence of a confirmed normal retirement date or age.

Follow Tony Healy on Twitter at @tony_healy and see www.tonyhealy.co.za for more informatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa