Bashir free, yet the atrocities go on
More cartoons online at
LAST week the high court in Pretoria denied the state leave to appeal in the matter pertaining to President Omar al-Bashir. The state’s failure to arrest Bashir was ruled to be unconstitutional and invalid and the court reiterated that South Africa had a duty to arrest Bashir.
The government’s failure to arrest Bashir is particularly worrisome when fresh reports of the state-sanctioned crimes against humanity continue to emerge from Darfur.
A new report released this month by Human Rights Watch details horrific crimes including murder, rape and forced displacement committed by government forces against civilians.
Before delving into the details of these atrocities, a brief historical account of the conflict in Darfur is necessary. The Darfur conflict is complex and has many cultural, social, religious and economic factors that have created fertile ground for conflict.
Typified by historical enmity between Arab tribes and African tribes, pastoralist and sedentary farmers, Muslims and nonMuslims, the conflict has a multitude of causes. The situation escalated in 2003 when the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement launched an insurgency against Bashir’s Khartoum government.
These two rebel groups took up arms as they felt that Bashir’s government neglected the region and favoured the people of Arab descent. This discrimination included monopolising the wealth, unequal distribution of land and segregation. The rebel groups began by attacking strategic government posts. This prompted a swift response from Bashir’s government including heavy aerial raids by government aircrafts and the deployment of the ruthless Janjaweed militia.
The Janjaweed militia are notorious for committing murder, rape, pillage and destroying all sources of water and food as they raid villages.
Reports indicate that they are not only armed by the government but are given instructions to terrorise civilians.
The UN has put the death toll at 300 000 since 2003, and has indicated that 2.7 million civilians have been displaced since the insurgency.
This carnage and the suffering of civilians prompted the UN Security Council to refer the situation to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
SA’s failure to arrest the head of Sudan is worrying considering fresh reports on state brutality
The ICC conducted investigations that led to the issuing of arrest warrants for Bashir, certain members of his government and members of the rebel movements.
Relying on the co-operation of signatory states to arrest fugitives is the only way that Bashir will have his day in court as the ICC has no police force of its own. If the harrowing statistics, the death toll and the suffering of innocent civilians between 2003 and 2010 was not reason enough for ICC signatories to arrest him then surely the ongoing perpetration of these crimes should spur governments into action today.
According to a 2015 Human Rights Watch report, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has launched fresh attacks against civilians in Darfur.
The RSF is a Sudanese government force under the command of the National Intelligence and Security Services. The RSF was created in 2013 in a bid to defeat all armed rebel groups in Sudan.
Their modus operandi includes burning villages, looting, torture, sexual violence, and the execution of civilians. They work in conjunction with the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Janjaweed.
Human Rights Watch interviewed more than 151 survivors and witnesses from Darfur, most of whom had fled Sudan to Chad and South Sudan. Survivors and witnesses who have remained in Sudan are classified as internally displaced people (IDPs) and, as such, have ended up in IDP camps in government-controlled areas where they are vulnerable to further persecution and out of the reach of many humanitarian organisations. This is due to a variety of factors including the Sudanese government’s hostility towards foreign aid agencies.
For example, in 2009 Bashir ordered all foreign aid agencies to leave the country, as he accused them of spying for the ICC.
The internally displaced people lack adequate food and shelter and are provided with no medical assistance. There are also reports from RSF defectors who explained that they were ordered to commit atrocities against innocent civilians.
Though UN and AU peacekeepers have been deployed, they face an uphill battle and have struggled to protect civilians.
The international peacekeepers have been present in Sudan since 2004, yet some have been killed and have been prevented access to conflict afflicted areas by Bashir’s government.
South Africa has been involved in the peace process in Sudan, but as reports indicate, it has failed to assuage the intensity of the conflict. The conflict rages on and crimes are committed with no accountability or justice for the victims.
Amid such shocking crimes, desperate victims and rampant impunity, it is particularly astounding that ICC signatory countries who had the chance to arrest the chief architect of these crimes failed to do so.