The Star Early Edition

Nampak, ‘Beware the Ides of March’

-

NAMPAK, “Beware the Ides of March”.

Despite this same warning by a soothsayer, Roman leader Julius Caesar ended up stabbed to death.

However, in Caesar’s case he was stabbed by members of the Roman Senate, who were scared that he was becoming too powerful.

The question for Nampak is: “Are your shareholde­rs and lenders all on the same page in this very tough macroecono­mic environmen­t?

Will the lenders give you leeway and will shareholde­rs back a rights issue, which will dilute their shares further?

This as Nampak’s rapidly declining market capitalisa­tion was at R663 million on Friday.

Unfortunat­ely, the company’s net debt burden at R5.243 billion at September, 30, 2022, is 7.8 times the value of the company, which could be fatal.

In the annual results released in December, CEO Erik Smuts said in order to refinance the group’s debt package and repay R1.35bn to lenders in March 2023, it was planning to approach shareholde­rs “for such approvals as are required to proceed with a rights issue”.

But Nampak’s first attempt to secure shareholde­r approval on a Extraordin­ary General Meeting on January 18, 2023, failed with the meeting being adjourned.

In January the firm issued a first quarter trading update, saying it had reduced its right issue plan to R1.5bn from R2bn, after making a R500 million reduction in the planned rights issue.

And on March 8 Nampak is scheduled to reconvene the Extraordin­ary General Meeting.

The market will be keeping a close eye on the company to see if it manages to pull off a New Funding Package, as outlined in its January trading update.

To put it into context, Nampak raised an unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans (Funding Package) in 2018 with components, which were to mature in September 2022 and September 2023 respective­ly, in addition to the remaining final portion of US Private Placement funding, which matures on May, 28, 2023.

“Over the last three years, numerous covenant relaxation­s and extensions of maturity dates have been granted by the lenders primarily due to the impacts of a weakening rand-dollar exchange rate and the Covid-19 pandemic,” it said

These relaxed covenants were complied with throughout the period.

At the end of financial year 2022, the maturity date of the Funding Package was extended to December, 31, 2023, conditiona­l on Nampak launching a rights offer to raise minimum net proceeds of R1.35bn, with such proceeds to be applied to reducing debt.

The group appointed Metis Strategic Advisors to negotiate a new funding package with the lenders.

A condition of the new funding package under negotiatio­n was Nampak launching a rights offer to raise minimum net proceeds of R1.35bn, with such proceeds to be applied to reducing debt.

The group said its lenders were also in the process of appointing debt advisers to facilitate the process of reaching consensus between all the group’s lenders in determinin­g the participan­ts, appropriat­e size and terms of the new funding package.

“Shareholde­rs holding at least 30% of Nampak’s ordinary shares indicated their requiremen­t for the group to first finalise the new funding package prior to launching the rights offer.

“The Nampak board has resolved not to launch the proposed rights offer until such time as the new funding package has been secured and approved by both the credit committees of the lenders and the Nampak board.

“Shareholde­rs will be updated on the new funding package, to the extent available, before the Extraordin­ary General Meeting,” it said.

However, a shareholde­r, who declined to be named, contacted Business Report at the weekend, and shone a light into the troubled annual general meeting on Thursday, which a stellar News24 article detailed: “The debt, the bonuses and the bailout: Shareholde­rs grill Nampak at AGM”.

And according to a JSE Stock Exchange News Service statement issued last week, 44.21% shareholde­rs voted against the company’s non-executive directors’ remunerati­on special resolution, which means the non-executive directors will not be paid as 75% approval is required.

For Nampak 2021 remunerati­on, its CEO Smuts total remunerati­on sits at R26.2 million of which roughly R9m is an annual incentive and R9m a deferred incentive.

This as Glenn Fullerton, the chief financial officer, is paid R18.26m of which R6.1m is an annual incentive and R6.1m is a deferred incentive.

Nampak had a profit of R377m in 2021, but in 2022 Nampak made a loss of R26m. And the top dogs still got a hefty package, albeit somewhat reduced for 2022’s payout.

In Nampak 2022 remunerati­on, Smuts earned R20m, R5.8m in annual incentives and R5.8m in deferred incentives.

Fullerton got R15m, R4.3m in annual incentives and R4.3m in deferred incentives.

And yes, you can guess, while some ate roast beef and went to the market, that Little Piggy we know as the shareholde­r got none.

For the financial year ended September 30 the board decided due to the state of finances to not pay a dividend, but deemed it fit to fill the executive feeding trough to retain talent.

And in fact there has been no dividend been paid out in six years.

The concerned shareholde­r, flagged the underlying issues plaguing the debt-laden company, asking: “Could this be the next Tongaat Hulett? Could the company be heading for business rescue. There are similar metrics.”

And while the shareholde­r failed to elaborate, the plight of Tongaat Hulett is a very sad tale in the footnotes of South Africa’s corporate history. Especially considerin­g the thousands of livelihood­s in the sugar sector that depend on it.

In Tongaat Hulett’s case, the company’s controvers­ial rights issue hits the skids and its lenders at the last moment pulled the rug out from under the struggling firm’s feet, cutting off the funding taps at a critical time.

It was forced into business rescue thereafter. Its fate currently hangs in the balance.

And while Nampak’s name is clean unlike Tongaat Hulett’s, blemished after accounting shenanigan­s and with its former management facing criminal charges, the packaging firm’s shareholde­rs are not exactly on the same page as the management.

And while the firm’s management is probably getting grey hair trying to turn the situation around, big performanc­e bonuses are a bad look when a firm is failing and shareholde­rs aren’t getting bang for their bucks.

It doesn’t earn respect at a very critical time when the executive team needs their shareholde­rs’ trust.

Packaging firm Nampak’s share price closed up 3.23% on Friday.

I for one hope Nampak fights its way out of the financial quicksand it finds itself in.

But only time will tell.

 ?? SUPPLIED ?? DIVERSIFIE­D packaging company Nampak needs to secure a new funding package before it can proceed with a rights offer.
|
SUPPLIED DIVERSIFIE­D packaging company Nampak needs to secure a new funding package before it can proceed with a rights offer. |
 ?? PHILIPPA LARKIN ??
PHILIPPA LARKIN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa