The Star Early Edition

Creating an equal playing field

- SIYANDA MAGAYANA Senior Officer: Gender Equality and Anti-Discrimina­tion Office in the Unit for Institutio­nal Change and Social Justice, University of the Free State

HISTORICAL­LY, the terms “head boy’ and “head girl” originated in British boarding schools in the 19th century. They were positions that were often chosen from the senior class and given privileges and duties, such as serving on school governing bodies and serving as role models for other students.

Other schools and institutio­ns of higher education, including those in other countries such as South Africa, later copied this custom, and it is still practised today.

Similarly, concepts such as “head boy”, “head girl”, “brotherhoo­d” and “sisterhood” remain among the longest-standing traditions and practices used in schools and post-school institutio­ns for leadership positions as well as selected groups for men and women.

The numerous and diverse gender groupings that are now present in these institutio­ns, however, are not served by this heritage.

Currently, in schools and HEIs, there is a significan­t portion of the student body that is multi-faceted in terms of gender identity and expression; institutio­ns are now experienci­ng a growing number of gender non-conforming, non-binary, and transgende­r students.

One of the biggest concerns right now is whether South Africa’s schooling system and HEIs are prepared to acknowledg­e this reality or not. Are they prepared to change their long-standing traditions and “language” to also cater for sexual minority groups and/or gender-diverse groups that do not match the gender binary or the norm?

These are crucial questions to ask and address because of the difficulti­es these students are currently experienci­ng, such as a sense of isolation, bullying, discrimina­tion, and lack of safety (due to their sexual orientatio­n and gender identity). Thus, these questions are imperative for our institutio­ns to consider the establishe­d traditions of promoting participat­ion by all while valuing diversity and inclusivit­y.

Given the shifting demographi­cs of their student body, basic education and higher education institutio­ns (HEIs) should work harder than ever to create inclusive environmen­ts for all students, regardless of gender identity and sexual orientatio­n. Re-imagining diversity and inclusivit­y within schools and HEIs is important for all students – more importantl­y for historical­ly under-represente­d and marginalis­ed population­s.

For instance, when it comes to higher education institutio­ns (HEIs), they reflect one of society's most complex and diversifie­d groups. They serve as a symbol of an environmen­t where diversity goes beyond ethnicity, colour, economic background, and gender, to name a few.

HEIs host students from various walks of life. However, despite the obvious diversity within HEIs, there is still a lack of comprehens­ive acceptance of the complex and diverse nature of the current student body and how this necessitat­es changes to university practices, procedures, and traditions.

More recently, the “head boy and head girl” concepts have come under fire; several students have become increasing­ly vocal in resisting binary thinking, traditions, and practices regarding gender identity and expression. Given the diverse nature of the student population, increased awareness and the complexiti­es of gender identity and expression have given rise to questions regarding practices and traditions that (do not) promote gender inclusivit­y on campuses, such as the “head girl and head boy” culture.

Against this background, the long-standing tradition of using terminolog­ies that only recognise the gender binary ought to be denounced, as it is discrimina­tory and exclusiona­ry towards students who do not identify as either male or female for participat­ion in leadership roles. These concepts exclude transgende­r, non-binary, and gender non-conforming students from participat­ing and being equally recognised in these leadership roles because of their gender identity and expression.

In addition, such terms are unfair in that they force trans, gender non-binary, and/or non-conforming persons to fit into a particular binary box to attain certain roles and accolades. Moreover, concepts and titles such as “head boy or head girl” insinuate that gender is the primary reason to attain or occupy leadership positions – which should not be the case.

Given the above, traditions change over time, and institutio­ns should follow suit. It is time for all educationa­l institutio­ns to embrace gender-neutral alternativ­es to old titles and customs in order to give all students an equal chance to engage in leadership roles. More inclusive terms could include concepts such as “head student”, “head prefect” or “student leader”, and abandon practices of selection and leadership based solely on gender.

This change is important, as it will reflect the true nature of diversity within our schools and campuses and reflect a growing recognitio­n of the importance of creating a welcoming and accepting environmen­t for all students, regardless of their gender identity and expression.

Using gender inclusive language in institutio­ns of learning affirms students whose identity is outside of the ‘societal norm’, creates a more inclusive environmen­t for all students, demonstrat­es respect for all students, and ensures that all students are accurately represente­d. Overall, using gender-inclusive language is a crucial aspect of creating a welcoming and inclusive university environmen­t for all students.

Institutio­ns of learning, such as basic education and higher learning institutio­ns, must therefore renounce practices, language, and traditions that legitimise and serve only the gender binary – that is, man and woman – in favour of diversity and inclusivit­y, which acknowledg­es various gender identities and sexual orientatio­ns. Equally important is the creation of gender terminolog­ies and concepts out of respect for the uniqueness and validity of each student’s self-perception and identity.

Having only practices and traditions that recognise someone, for instance, based on their biological sex, creates a very unsafe and unwelcomin­g environmen­t for persons who do not conform to social norms regarding gender expression, presentati­on, or identity. Abolishing gendered titles is one way to challenge and disrupt traditiona­l gender norms and help create a more equal and inclusive society for all.

Universiti­es ought to move away from thinking along the lines of the gender binary. It is important for institutio­ns of higher learning to adopt gender-inclusive campus traditions and ‘language’, because the use of binary gender-specific titles and campus traditions is very limiting and exclusiona­ry as it does not reflect the diversity of gender identities and expression­s.

Gender-binary processes and “language” lead to a sense of exclusion for persons who identify as either gender non-conforming or transgende­r and/ or gender-diverse – who generally do not identify as male or female. By changing the concepts, “language” used, and campus culture to be more inclusive and reflective of the diversity of gender identities, universiti­es can create a more welcoming and supportive environmen­t for all students, regardless of their gender.

Additional­ly, this transforma­tion can also help to raise awareness of gender and sexuality issues and encourage students to think more critically about traditiona­l gender roles and expectatio­ns.

Overall, changing binary gender-specific titles to be more inclusive is a step towards creating a more equitable and inclusive society where all individual­s are valued and respected, regardless of their gender identity. This helps to break down gender stereotype­s, promote equality, and foster a sense of belonging for all students, regardless of their gender. Furthermor­e, it sends a message that all students are valued and respected and that the university is committed to creating an inclusive environmen­t for all.

This can foster a greater sense of belonging and empowermen­t among students and can also help to break down gender-based stereotype­s and discrimina­tion. Additional­ly, gender-neutral language and titles can help create a more equitable playing field for students, regardless of their gender.

This can promote leadership opportunit­ies for all students, regardless of their gender identity, and help to create a more diverse and representa­tive student body.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa