The Star Late Edition

Indignity for many women

- NKOSIKHULU­LE NYEMBEZI Nyembezi is a researcher, policy analyst and a human rights activist.

THE ill-treatment of women in polygamous marriages in South African politics should fill us with despair as government’s failure to meet a twoyear deadline to change the law to protect women in polygamous marriages has once more made headlines.

In November 2017, the Constituti­onal Court ordered government to amend the Recognitio­n of Customary Marriages Act to ensure the equitable distributi­on of assets should a spouse in a polygamous marriage die. Sadly, the law was never changed.

Six weeks before the expiry of the deadline set in 2017, the Minister of Justice and Correction­al Services approached the Constituti­onal Court seeking another 12 months’ extension.

He provided several reasons for the failure to change the law, including that 2018 and 2019 were difficult years in the legislativ­e process due to the national elections. He also noted that, because the legislatio­n in question deals with customary law, it will be required to follow elaborate processes which include considerat­ion of further input from the National House of Traditiona­l Leaders.

Based on the court judgment in 2017, we all knew that this law unjustifia­bly limits the right to dignity as well as the right not to be discrimina­ted against unfairly. And so, how come traditiona­l leaders have not pressed Parliament to amendment legislatio­n in compliance with the court order in order to vindicate the constituti­onal rights? How come this matter never featured as a priority in the national and provincial houses of traditiona­l leaders? What account can traditiona­l leaders provide on this?

I still remember very well. It was in 2017 at the Constituti­onal Court when I bumped into two acquaintan­ces. They were both members of the National House of Traditiona­l Leaders and were standing outside the main entrance to the court.

They had been inside, to hear the judgement on this matter challengin­g the constituti­onality of the Recognitio­n of Customary Marriages Act. But immediatel­y after the judgment was delivered, they were lingering on the pavement, drawn in by the political energy of the occasion, and yet, simultaneo­usly repelled, as though by an invisible force.

I think often of their faces, of the pain and bewilderme­nt, every time the ANC-led government, as well as the national and provincial houses of traditiona­l leaders’ derisory handling of the overdue legislativ­e amendments returns to the headlines.

Every woman in a polygamous marriage has her own family story – of love and conflict, of threats and losses, but also of community and belonging.

My own family’s journey in growing up in a polygamous marriage may explain my own shock at the government’s failure to meet the two-year deadline to change the law to protect women in polygamous marriages.

A contention that 2018 and 2019 were atypical years in the legislativ­e process due to the 2019 elections which caused inevitable interrupti­ons and changed the ordinary deadlines for government department­s to submit Bills to be passed is unacceptab­le, given a situation where other conservati­ve and not time-sensitive Bills were given priority.

Failure to change the law as directed by courts should be a reminder that, for many in South Africa, the experience of inequality and indignity is still the norm and not the exception.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa