The Star Late Edition

School aftercare rules slammed

Parent denounces ‘three strikes and you’re out’ policy as unfair after daughter, 10, barred from the service

- YOLISA TSWANYA yolisa.tswanya@inl.co.za

MILNERTON Primary School has come under fire from a parent who said their aftercare policy was unfair and should be changed.

The school removed Nathi Fokazi’s 10-year-old daughter from aftercare and she would not be able to use the service for the rest of her primary school years.

The decision by the school is as a result of the school’s policy, which Fokazi said only allowed parents to be late three times a year to collect their child.

Fokazi said he fetched his daughter late six times, and on all occasions it wasn’t more than a few minutes over time.

Fokazi said he was worried that his daughter would now have to use public transport on her own, and be at home alone until the late afternoon.

“It’s scary… a 10-year-old girl travelling alone, especially given the vulnerabil­ity of girl children – all the kidnapping­s that target school kids.

“Aftercare facilities in the area are more expensive; the cheapest is three times more than what we pay as they also include transport from the school,” he said.

The school was quick to bend the rules when it suited them.

“It is not supportive of the environmen­t that they want to have… they say that they want to create a safe environmen­t for children.

“This is a policy that needs to be changed and they also know that it is unfair for parents to be punished twice. First you pay a fine and then you get kicked out for the rest of the school career,” Fokazi said.

He said that according to the policy you have to pay a fine of R10 a minute when you are late to collect your child.

“On all the occasions we were late, which was six times in a year, we were five minutes late. The latest was maybe six minutes.”

The school referred our sister paper, the Cape Times, to the Western Cape Education Department (WCED) for comment, but in communicat­ion to Fokazi, which the Cape Times has seen, principal Warick Middleton said the school’s aftercare policy was clear, and they would not be able to reinstate his daughter’s aftercare arrangemen­t.

“(This) will set a precedent which makes the policy agreement obsolete. We are thus unable to consider a re-admission to aftercare.

“Should you require the contact details of private aftercare facilities used by our parents, then our receptioni­st may be able to assist,” the communique read.

WCED spokespers­on Bronagh Hammond said that the school governing bodies were responsibl­e for after-school activities such as aftercare.

“In this particular school the school administer­s the aftercare,” Hammond added.

Gender-based violence advocacy group Ilitha Labantu’s spokespers­on Siyabulela Monakali said that with all the horrible things happening in the country, the school and parents needed to work together.

“The school and the parents need to come to a consensus on how they can deal with the situation because the child’s safety is the main priority.

“Where parents have difference­s and the school has its policies, they need to come together and be there for the well-being of the child.

“If something happened to the child they could be liable as they could have done something.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa