The Witness

Climate: The anomaly

- Gwynne Dyer • Gwynne Dyer’s new book is

It was bound to happen some time, and the time could well be now. We know that when there was strong warming on our planet (like at the end of the last Ice Age about 11 000 years ago), there were sudden big leaps in the global temperatur­e. It wasn’t a smooth process at all.

The worrisome part of the current warming is not just that it has given us the hottest year on record. We’ve been breaking old records for some time now, as you would expect when you keep putting 40 billion tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year. It’s the scale of the rise in temperatur­e this year: twotenths of a degree Celsius (0,2°C).

Climate scientists are calling it an anomaly, which is not so much an explanatio­n as an admission that they can’t explain it. Changes in average global temperatur­e from one year to another tend to be quite small. This one is gigantic. Through all the decades since the 1950s, as the carbon dioxide, methane and other warming gases piled up, the actual rise was calculated to be 0,18 of a degree Celsius per decade. Not per year, per decade.

Renowned climate scientist James Hansen recently claimed that in about 2010, the rate of warming rose to 0,27 of a degree per decade — a 50% accelerati­on in the warming, and well worth worrying about. But

Hansen’s number still implies that it would take almost four decades to raise average global temperatur­e by one full degree.

Whereas if this year’s rate of warming persists, it would give us two full degrees of extra warming by 2034. Add the warming we have already caused (1,5 °C), and the average global temperatur­e 10 years from now would be 3,5°C higher. That’s mass dieback at the very least, and probably the collapse of our current civilisati­on. I’m not trying to scare you, and I don’t think we are really on that catastroph­ic track. But it is clearly a very big deal, and the climate scientists have no ready explanatio­n.

There is a list of likely tipping points that covers all the known contingenc­ies: permafrost thawing, Amazon rainforest dieback, loss of the West Antarctic ice sheet, etc., but this anomaly doesn’t fit any of the known categories. Scientists simply don’t know what is causing the anomaly, and they don’t like making guesses. However, a recent hypothesis by Hansen may be relevant, even though he wrote his latest paper before the scale of the anomaly was clear.

Hansen suggested that cleaning up sulfur dioxide emissions over the past 10 to 15 years (in industrial cities and in emissions at sea from 60 000 large commercial vessels) has been too successful. The sulfurous clouds were hard on people’s health, but they also reflected a lot of sunlight back into space and cooled the climate.

Cutting the sulfur emissions considerab­ly worsened the planet’s energy imbalance (more energy coming in than going out), and that translates into more heat. Whether that is a big enough change to account for the anomaly remains to be seen, because measuring cloud effects is a murky business, but that would be a reassuring answer. If it’s the loss of the sulfur dioxide, then at least it’s a known and self-limiting event. We could choose to live with it, or we could try to get that lost cooling back by putting some alternativ­e, harmless aerosol into the air, but either way it’s not a world-changing phenomenon.

If, on the other hand, it’s not the lost sulfur dioxide, then it could mean anything, including large and rapid jumps in global temperatur­e. The brutal truth is that the Intergover­nmental Panel on Climate Change, the United Nations’ main instrument for dealing with the climate crisis, has systematic­ally downplayed the risks we are running. The prediction­s it makes are almost all based on the assumption that global warming will be a slow, smooth, predictabl­e process, whereas everybody there knows that is unlikely. The tipping points are real, they may be quite abrupt, and sooner or later we are bound to trip over them if emissions are not cut drasticall­y in the near future.

As Gavin Schmidt, the director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, wrote recently: “If the anomaly does not stabilise by August, then the world will be in uncharted territory.”

Interventi­on Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World’s Climate Engineers.

 ?? PHOTO: AFP ?? People pose for selfies at the Jinhae Cherry Blossom Festival in Changwon, southeast of Seoul in South Korea, on Sunday. The annual festival has been running since 1952.
PHOTO: AFP People pose for selfies at the Jinhae Cherry Blossom Festival in Changwon, southeast of Seoul in South Korea, on Sunday. The annual festival has been running since 1952.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa