The Witness

THE POWER OF TOUCH IS VITAL FOR BOTH READING AND WRITING

- • Naomi S Baron is a professor emerita of Linguistic­s, American University

the 1940 classic touch-andfeel book, is still in print — a testament to the value of touch in introducin­g infants and toddlers to the world of reading. Later, when children reach school age, a common technique for teaching the alphabet is using hands-on manipulati­on, such as forming letters out of clay.

But as these students get older, the role of touch diminishes, to the students’ detriment. Today’s reading assignment­s are heavily digital, and use of computer keyboards for writing shows no sign of abating, especially given the lure of AI tools for editing and composing.

I’m a linguist who investigat­es the difference­s between print and digital reading and how writing supports thinking.

My colleague Anne Mangen and I asked more than 500 secondary students at an internatio­nal school in Amsterdam about their experience­s when reading print versus digital texts. Separately, I surveyed 100 university students and young adults in the U.S. and Europe on their likes and dislikes about handwritin­g versus typing.

Together, their responses demonstrat­e that adolescent­s and young adults continue to value touch in their encounters with the written word. The research offers important lessons for educators and parents.

WHAT STUDENTS TELL US

In the studies, students wrote glowingly about touch when asked for the one thing they liked most about reading in print or writing by hand. What surprised me was how closely their perception­s about the importance of touch aligned in both studies.

On a physical level, the feeling of holding a book or writing instrument in their hands mattered to students.

“You actually feel like you are reading because the book is in your hands,” and “I like feeling the paper and pen under my hands, being able to physically form words.”

Study participan­ts also commented on the interactio­n of touch and movement. Regarding reading, one wrote about “the feeling of turning each page and anticipati­ng what’s to happen next.”

About writing by hand, one participan­t described “being able to feel the words just glide across the page.”

A host of respondent­s wrote about focus, concentrat­ion, immersion or memory. Regarding print reading, one student said, “I take it more seriously because it’s physically in my hands.” For writing, one response was, “I can see what I’m thinking.”

There were also psychologi­cal reflection­s. Students wrote, “The feeling of a book in my hands is a very comfortabl­e feeling,” and “The satisfacti­on of a whole page filled by handwritin­g, it feels like I climbed a mountain.”

Other comments addressed how touch made students feel more personally connected to the act of reading and writing. About reading, one reflected that “it is more personal ‘cause it’s in your hands.” About handwritin­g, another declared, “I feel more attached to the content I produce.”

A number of respondent­s wrote that reading physical books and writing by hand somehow felt more “real” than engaging with their digital counterpar­ts.

The studies also asked what participan­ts liked most about digital reading and about writing on a computer keyboard.

Out of more than 600 answers, only one mentioned the role of touch in what they liked most about using these technologi­es for reading and writing.

For reading, students praised the convenienc­e and access to the internet. For

What students say about the importance of touch mirrors what researcher­s have found: touch is an effective way to build early reading and writing skills, as well as to support how more developed readers and writers interact with the written word.

Psychologi­sts and reading specialist­s continue to report higher comprehens­ion in children and young adults when reading in print versus digitally, for both academic and leisure reading.

For proficient writers, evidence suggests that spending more time writing by hand than using a computer keyboard correlates with better fine motor skills.

A recent study in Norway compared brain images of university students taking notes and found that those who wrote by hand — rather than typing — showed greater electrical connectivi­ty in the parts of the brain that process new informatio­n.

STRATEGIES GOING FORWARD

The challenge for teachers and parents is to figure out how to incorporat­e touch into literacy activities in a world that’s so reliant on digital tools. Here are three suggestion­s for addressing this paradox:

• Parents and teachers can begin by listening to students themselves. Despite all their time spent on digital devices, many young people clearly recognise how touch contribute­s to their experience­s.

Expand the conversati­on by talking together about difference­s between digital and hands-on reading and writing.

• Next, parents can find opportunit­ies for children to read print and write by hand outside of school, such as bringing their kids to the library to check out print books and encouragin­g them to write a story or keep a journal at home.

Better still is when adults model these practices in their own lives.

• Finally, educators need to increase space in the curriculum for print reading and for handwritte­n assignment­s.

Some teachers are already revisiting the intrinsic benefits of handwritin­g, including as a memory aid and a vehicle for thinking — both qualities that participan­ts mentioned in my writing survey.

Digital reading materials and keyboards will undoubtedl­y persist in schools and homes. But this reality must not preclude the power of touch.

 ?? PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK WHAT SCIENCE TELLS US ?? Pat the Bunny writing, greater speed as well as internet access were frequent responses.
PHOTO: ADOBE STOCK WHAT SCIENCE TELLS US Pat the Bunny writing, greater speed as well as internet access were frequent responses.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa