Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

‘Mover and shaker’ must repay investor

- BRUCE CAMERON

Cape Town financial adviser Bernard Marc Edgcumbe and three companies of which he was “mover and shaker” have been ordered to repay R263 000 to Vinola Bam-Mgugunyeka, whom Edgcumbe advised to invest in two failed property developmen­ts.

This is financial advice ombud Noluntu Bam’s second determinat­ion against Edgcumbe. In December last year, Bam ordered Edgcumbe to repay R1.18 million to wheelchair­bound pensioner Roelof Germishuys and his wife, who he advised to invest in similar highrisk property developmen­ts.

Edgcumbe was the key individual and authorised representa­tive of three financial services entities: UC Private Wealth, trading as Liberty Moon Investment­s; Mountain Brokers, which used the financial services provider registrati­on number of an entity called Lucre, the Financial Collective; and Mountain Brokers Trust. All these entities have been deregister­ed.

Edgcumbe used the companies when advising Bam-Mgugunyeka.

He recommende­d to BamMguguny­eka that she invest in Genesis Property Partners and Cedar Falls Properties, both of which were part of the Genesis Property group of companies (Genesis), which were allegedly developing sites just outside Cape Town and at the V&A Waterfront.

He told Bam-Mgugunyeka that the investment was low risk and that she would get back her initial investment, plus interest of 25 percent, after six months.

In March 2008, BamMguguny­eka invested R120 000 in Genesis Property Partners and R160 000 in Cedar.

When the investment was due, Bam-Mgugunyeka contacted Edgcumbe, who told her that Genesis had been having problems since March of that year in paying interest.

Edgcumbe accused Genesis’s management of theft and mismanagem­ent. BamMguguny­eka contacted Edgcumbe on numerous occasions, only to be told he could not help her.

The now-bankrupt Genesis (formerly the Property Interactio­n Group) was founded by Marelize Lombard, and it sponsored numerous property developmen­ts.

Edgcumbe argued that the investment was not a financial product. He said BamMguguny­eka was well educated and should have understood the product; and he argued that the ombud did not have the authority to deal with the complaint.

Bam dismissed all these arguments. She found that Edgcumbe contravene­d the Financial Advisory and Intermedia­ry Services Act and its code of conduct by:

Failing to conduct a proper due diligence of the Genesis investment­s. That Genesis was offering a “guaranteed” interest rate of 25 percent alone should have been a “red flag”, as should the fact that it was unlicensed and unregulate­d – factors that usually result in mismanagem­ent and fraud going undetected.

Not keeping a record of the advice he provided.

Recommendi­ng a product that was not suitable for the level of risk that Bam-Mgugunyeka, who was unemployed at the time, could tolerate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa