Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Despite whistleblo­wing and red flags the gravy train rolls on

Eye

- WILLIAM SAUNDERSON–MEYER Jaundiced

LUCKY Montana, former chief executive of the Public Rail Agency of South Africa, this week accused Public Protector Thuli Madonsela of having a tendency to “create drama”.

He was responding to the findings of her inquiry into Prasa irregulari­ties, which details more than R2 billion in misappropr­iated funds, and lays responsibi­lity at his door.

Whether or not she is a drama queen as alleged, Madonsela certainly has a penchant for wry humour. Her report damning the expenditur­e of R247 million on supposed security upgrades to President Jacob Zuma’s Nkandla private homestead was titled “Secure in Comfort”. Her long-awaited Prasa report is called “Derailed”.

Montana was fired by the Prasa board last month. This followed upon a series of exposés in Rapport – unrelated to the 37 complaints investigat­ed by the protector – which claimed irregulari­ties in a R51bn tender for passenger coaches, as well as that the new locomotive­s bought from Spain at a cost of R600m, were of the wrong height for safe travel on SA’s rail network.

Montana should consider himself, umm, Lucky. Imagine what wicked fun Madonsela could have had with the claim that the ex-CEO improperly took himself and “10 female companions” on an overnight jaunt on the luxurious Blue Train, flying back on SAA at a cost of R170 000.

Montana denies the allegation and in response to a request for his diary, “argued that Prasa uses an electronic diary and... these electronic diaries automatica­lly delete entries of the preceding years”. After scrutinisi­ng the photograph­ic evidence provided by the complainan­t, Madonsela concluded that the evidence was was “inconclu- sive” and deferred her finding, to be dealt with in her second report.

One must hope that Montana, who says he will contest the protector’s report “even in the highest courts”, will make a ringing rebuttal of the claims. Montana, who a few years back hired bodyguards after threats against his life, could for example argue that he was merely emulating the late, great Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who had a detachment of Amazonian women protecting him.

If Gaddafi could travel the entire world with a bevy of killer chicks, why shouldn’t the head of Prasa go on a choo-choo to Cape Town with fewer than a dozen? As long as they were chosen according to public service regulation­s, to accurately reflected SA’s racial demographi­cs, of course.

Madonsela’s inquiry, like most of her office’s investigat­ions, follows on whistleblo­wing from within the organisati­on. These often are in response, not to outrage at public corruption, but rather to a perceived personal injustice, such as being excluded from the trough, or being sidelined because of cronyism.

What should worry SA most about the Prasa matter is that the malfeasanc­e went undetected for so long by internal controls and external supervisor­y mechanisms. While one appreciate­s the magnitude of state failure and corruption confrontin­g the auditor-general’s office, it is in retrospect incomprehe­nsible that the auditor-general gave Prasa nine consecutiv­e clean audits, up to and including last year.

This was despite, in 2010, a Deloitte audit uncovering an R8.1m fraudulent transactio­n. Prasa took no action nor did the police, despite the identities of those involved being known.

And it is not only the auditor-general who should be embarrasse­d. In 2010, the National Treasury was asked by Prasa for a R1bn injection to cover the takeover of Shosholoza Meyl. Treasury coughed up R500m, but despite the money never being used for its intended purpose, the government ignored the irregulari­ty.

Madonsela’s report has been met with predictabl­e political hyperbole. DA leader Mmusi Maimane says the Prasa scandal is “bigger than Nkandla”. He is mistaken and possibly a little naive.

Nkandla is a scandal unrivalled in our post-apartheid history. Not because of the amount of money involved but because Zuma is willing to defy and potentiall­y destroy a cornerston­e of SA’s constituti­onal democracy – the office of the public protector – and his supine ANC colleagues are going along with it.

It is likely, too, that the levels of corruption and chicanery uncovered at Prasa are matched or exceeded at other such enterprise­s. There are at least 130, including biggies like Eskom, the SA Post Office, SA Airways, Alexkor, Denel, Transnet, Telkom, Airports Company, PetroSA, and the National Lottery Board.

Prasa is important, not so much for the scale of the wrongdoing uncovered by the public protector, but the fact that it took place under the noses of the auditor-general, the Treasury, and the supervisor­y committees of Parliament. It is reasonable to conclude that hundreds of billions in taxpayer funds have being stolen and wasted in the stateowned enterprise­s. Unfortunat­ely, those who should care most – the voters – mostly don’t seem to give a damn. Follow WSM on Twitter

@TheJaundic­edEye

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa