Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Good Hope Centre site ‘holds the key’

He’s raising Kane to effect urban change

- MICHAEL MORRIS

NOT ENTIRELY in jest some years ago, Rob Kane suggested to the city that instead of their spending R9.5 million a year maintainin­g the Good Hope Centre, it could be demolished for R4.5m, and they would save R5m in the first year.

The anecdote underscore­s Kane’s preoccupat­ions – marrying economic sense with the ideal of making a more liveable, integrated city.

The Good Hope Centre, he remains convinced, is a parcel of land – like others on the periphery of the central city – that begs to be developed as affordable housing.

To get it right, though, he said this week, would require a more focused, efficient and practical approach that would avoid the pitfalls of the convention­al highest-price tender system – compelling developers to “squeeze” every rand from a project, or go out of business – and limiting the city’s scope for guaranteei­ng an affordable housing outcome.

Kane wears two hats, but if his roles are distinctiv­e, they are not wholly separable.

He chairs the board of the Cape Town Central City Improvemen­t District (CCID) – whose contributi­on to the commonweal­th of the metropole is readily reflected in the CBD’s property valuations hike from R6 billion in 2006 to R24bn today – and he is also a property developer, the chief executive of Boxwood Property Fund.

Kane, who trained as a civil engineer, said his view of the possibilit­ies in Cape Town drew as much on his CCID experience as on his work in developing residentia­l and commercial space, chiefly converting older buildings for new uses.

The argument for a different kind of city was incontrove­rtible. He cited UCT property economist Francois Viruly’s “40x40x40x4­0” rule – a measure of the urban condition that afflicts most South African cities; people living in 40m² homes, 40km from where they work, spending at least 40 percent of their income on transport, and living in communitie­s where there is 40 percent unemployme­nt.

“It is a brutal statistic,” Kane said.

The most obvious interventi­on was to create housing closer to jobs. But success – and the considerab­le knock-on benefits of better lives, less traffic congestion, more economic activity and less wasted expense on costly infrastruc­ture to service the peripheral sprawl – would depend on a fresh approach.

Kane’s preferred option was for the city to appoint a dedicated task team – drawing closely on the private sector – not to fashion an inevitably “nebulous” policy framework, but to tackle a particular site or building, and craft a proposal to achieve a specific result.

As things stood, the eco- nomics of the property market was an unforgivin­g constraint, and risks to developers arising largely from unpredicta­ble and delay-prone planning and approvals processes was profoundly dissuasive.

The CBD – the CCID area – had experience­d an “explosion of developmen­t”, with the value of real estate growing four-fold since 2006. With this came an “explosion of jobs” and of rates revenue, which was “being spread across the metro, as it should”.

In this way, the CBD’s success was a common benefit to the whole city, even though it came with increased demands, not least in traffic congestion leading into the city. “It’s a problem we are lucky to have,” Kane noted, “though one that needs urgent resolution.”

But there were limits to what could be done on highpriced central- city land. “There has been criticism that the CBD is exclusive, but the problem is that prices have risen so high that to buy and convert a building in the hope of providing affordable housing is just not profitable.

“And if you try to stop developers from making money they will simply go elsewhere, to Joburg, Tshwane or London.”

That said, within the CBD periphery – rather than the central city – there was “huge” scope for targeted affordable housing projects.

The Good Hope Centre was a case in point. “I’m guessing, but you could probably put between 1 000 and 2 000 units on that site, with a small retail centre, and a crèche. There are lots of good schools in the area, and it would give a lot of people the option of walking to work.”

Nearby, especially in the East City precinct, there were “tons of public land and buildings”.

But if projects were put out to tender in the normal way – for the highest price – developers were “forced into really squeezing every last drop of value out of that land”, which mitigated the prospects for affordable housing.

However, a special task team could help draw up a legal and planning formula that would ensure an economic propositio­n for a developer, but enable the city to set out its requiremen­ts for an affordable end product.

One of the biggest problems developers faced was unpredicta­ble and time-consuming town planning and heritage processes. “I have redevelope­d many buildings in town over the years and, I can tell you, the process can be quite scary,” Kane said.

“Marrying lease expiration­s with the town planning process is really difficult, for instance. These are among the issues that haunt developers.”

One consequenc­e was that the city’s “most beautiful” (older) buildings were deteriorat­ing because developers weren’t interested in taking them on. “The irony here is that the most run-down build- ings in need of care are generally heritage protected.

“The heritage implicatio­ns can be onerous, and represent too much risk to developers. Instead, they are filled with low- or short-term rental shops, and they are falling to pieces. There’s not enough income, or incentive, to fix them up.

“There’s a real tragedy there.”

Kane credited Cape Town with being “more open than most cities”, and he believed a dialogue about developmen­t difficulti­es would be “most useful”.

“If processes can be streamline­d, the CBD will become an even stronger developmen­t node, which fits very well with the city’s densificat­ion strategy. And I think there’s a good chance that stakeholde­rs could collaborat­e to arrive at creative solutions for affordable housing close to the CBD.”

The knock- on benefits would be felt city-wide.

In an interview last month, Transport and Public Works MEC Donald Grant and Human Settlement­s MEC Bonginkosi Madikizela said the multibilli­on-rand Conradie Better Living Model Exemplar Project near Pinelands was intended as a prototype to guide future integrated housing developmen­ts, including on city-owned land in the innercity. michael.morris@inl.co.za

 ?? PICTURE: CCID ?? Outside the CBD, there is much scope for affordable housing developmen­t, not least on the Good Hope Centre site, below left, says Rob Kane.
PICTURE: CCID Outside the CBD, there is much scope for affordable housing developmen­t, not least on the Good Hope Centre site, below left, says Rob Kane.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa