Many challenges loom for newly appointed NPA head

THE APPOINTMENT of Shamila Batohi as the new head of the National Prosecuting Authority has elicited widespread delight.

In fact, not since Cyril Ramaphosa’s victory over the forces of darkness at last December’s leadership conference has there been such national excitement. Unfortunately, Ramaphosa’s “new dawn” has since proven to be somewhat delayed and murkier than hoped.

And, also unfortunately, the elevated hopes that attend Batohi’s appointment may be similarly dashed, not necessarily through any fault of her own.

As we know from the seven-year tenure with the previous public protector, Thuli Madonsela, a determined and honest person at the head of an institution with powers to investigate and seek redress can make an enormous difference.

The first problem that Batohi faces is the independence of the NPA, or rather the lack thereof. The public protector’s office is one of only six state institutions whose independence is constitutionally protected and that are specifically mandated to operate “without fear, favour or prejudice”.

Tragically, the NPA is not one of those six. The appointment of the head of the NPA has always been a political appointment, made by the president in order to achieve partisan objectives – to ignore the criminal transgressions of his cronies and to pursue and punish those of his opponents.

That Ramaphosa, uniquely, has tried to make the appointment of the new NPA head a transparent and non-partisan process, by involving the legal profession in the selection, is to be commended. It does not mean, however, that Batohi will not encounter great political pressures.

It suits the Ramaphosa administration to be able to distance itself from the prosecutions for state capture that Batohi will now undoubtedly pursue with vigour. So, initially, an independent NPA head means the weakening of the faction supporting former president Jacob Zuma, without the Ramaphosa faction having to bloody their hands.

But it is going to be a different matter when the NPA’s attention eventually lights upon the criminal actions of some of those who bailed from the Zuma ship to muster under the Ramaphosa flag. When that happens, it will be the real test of whether Batohi truly has the independence that Ramaphosa glibly assures us she has.

The issue of NPA independence is, though, easily solvable. If the ANC wants a truly independent national prosecutor, it can simply bring a constitutional amendment to achieve that.

More intractable is the other major hurdle facing Batohi, that of the NPA’s competence. She inherits an agency that is dysfunctional, divided and neglected. Many prosecutors with ability and integrity, who baulked at being at the bidding of ANC politicians, just left. Many of those remaining lack the marketable skills required to survive elsewhere and – as evidenced by the inability of the NPA to prosecute and win cases – are simply professionally inept or else possibly so corrupt that they are willing to act inept when it’s politically prudent to do so.

The problems of the NPA are never going to be solved simply by a new director, no matter how impressive her credentials. What is needed is a change in attitude by the ANC towards the institutions that were set up to protect human rights and constitutional democracy, but which have been white-anted by the ruling party.