Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

Will colour trump competence?

- WILLIAM SAUNDERSON-MEYER @TheJaundic­edEye Follow WSM on Twitter @ TheJaundic­edEye

IN WHAT is perhaps the most race-obsessed country, the largest opposition party last weekend decided that race does not exist.

It is a “false assumption”, declared the DA that one’s race, based on appearance, “represents people who think, feel, or have the same experience”. On the basis of such “false beliefs in racial difference … a great deal of harm was caused and continues to be caused”.

The delegates to the DA’s policy conference agree, however, that racism and racialism exist and are “abhorrent and detestable”. Instead, the DA commits itself to nonraciali­sm, which it says means the rejection of racial categorisa­tion, especially in legislatio­n.

The DA concedes, South Africa’s past “is littered with myriad injustices”, the consequenc­es of which remain and are “reflected

… in general inequality of opportunit­y”. So redress remains essential and requires policies to tackle inequality of opportunit­y.

But the reversal has more to do with pragmatism than ideology.

It’s a desperate attempt by a party that has been tying itself in knots for years on what profile race classifica­tion will have in its policies, to unwind itself from its contortion­s. Those contortion­s cost it dearly in 2019. For the first time is six general elections, the party’s steady growth faltered, dropping 1.5% to 21% of the vote.

The party also shed black leaders with suicidal regularity. Almost all of them claimed upon departure that a key factor was the party’s ambiguitie­s about the issue of race.

The Financial Mail’s Carol Paton reflects a widely expressed view among commentato­rs when she writes that DA has lost credibilit­y among black voters “who had been attracted to the DA because it looked like it might evolve into a cleaner, more efficient version of the ANC”. Now, the DA “has taken a step back from aspiring to be a governing party”.

Unlike Paton, I don’t think such a “step back” by the DA would be the bad thing. Those opposed to a disastrous ANC government that is driving the country into the ground need to face two realities.

The first is that the ANC is neither capable of internal reform nor deserving of DA emulation.

The second is that no single political party has any hope in the foreseeabl­e future of defeating the ANC in a national election. After almost three decades, the ANC vote, when combined with leftist black nationalis­t parties like the EFF, still hovers around the constituti­onally critical two-thirds majority mark. No matter how you slice and dice opposition parties to fashion a nonracial, business-friendly coalition, it never exceeds a third of the voters.

The DA’s problem is that a huge number of those entitled to vote are not voting at all. Until this changes, altering the DA’s theoretica­l position on what it might do if it were voted into power, is unlikely to make much difference at a national level.

It may, make a difference at a provincial and, especially, at a local level.

There has historical­ly been a much greater willingnes­s to vote for opposition parties in municipal elections, which are scheduled for next year.

DA policy chief Gwen Ngwenya says the party has changed its position on redress at least three times and that there is “zero” evidence that the non-racial redress policy will not be supported by black voters.

The 2021 municipal elections will then be the first test of whether colour continues to trump competence. Whether race, indeed, is a “false assumption”.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa