Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)
No sign of life in Mars rock after all, say scientists
A 4 BILLION-year-old meteorite from Mars that caused a splash here on Earth decades ago contains no evidence of ancient, primitive Martian life after all, scientists reported this week.
Millions of years after drifting through space, the meteorite landed in Antarctica thousands of years ago. In 1996, a Nasa-led team said organic compounds in the rock appeared to have been left by living creatures.
Other scientists were sceptical and researchers chipped away at that premise over the decades, most recently a team led by the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Andrew Steele.
Samples from the meteorite show the carbon-rich compounds are actually the result of water – most likely salty, water – flowing over the rock for a prolonged period, Steele said.
During Mars’s wet and early past, at least two impacts occurred near the rock, heating the planet’s surrounding surface, before a third impact bounced it off the red planet and into space millions of years ago. The 2kg rock was found in Antarctica in 1984.
Groundwater moving through the cracks in the rock, while it was still on Mars, formed the tiny globs of carbon that are present, according to the researchers. The same thing can happen on Earth and could help explain the presence of methane in Mars’s atmosphere, they said.
But two scientists who took part in the original study took issue with these latest findings, calling them “disappointing”. They said they stood by their 1996 observations.
“While the data presented incrementally adds to our knowledge of (the meteorite), the interpretation is hardly novel, nor is it supported by the research,” wrote Kathie Thomas-Keprta and Simon Clemett, astro material researchers at Nasa’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
“Unsupported speculation does nothing to resolve the conundrum surrounding the origin of organic matter” in the meteorite, they added.
According to Steele, advances in technology made his team’s new findings possible.
He commended the measurements by the original researchers and noted their life-claiming hypothesis “was a reasonable interpretation” at the time. He and his team had taken care to present their results “for what they are, which is a very exciting discovery about Mars and not a study to disprove” the original premise.
This finding “is huge for our understanding of how life started on this planet and helps refine the techniques we need to find life elsewhere on Mars, or Enceladus and Europa,” Steele said, referring to Saturn and Jupiter’s moons.
The only way to prove whether Mars ever had, or still has, microbial life, Steele said, is to bring samples to Earth for analysis. Nasa’s Perseverance Mars rover has collected six samples for return to Earth in a decade or so; three dozen samples are desired.
|