Weekend Argus (Saturday Edition)

UCT sex case laid bare

- VELANI LUDIDI velani.ludidi@inl.co.za

DAMNING details have emerged following an investigat­ion into a sexual harassment case at UCT.

An investigat­ion by the Weekend Argus, with the assistance of people close to the case, uncovered a report by the Department of Health, a signed statement from the student, letters with intent to suspend the student after she allegedly leaked informatio­n about her ordeal and medical records by doctors.

According to the department’s report, UCT and the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness reportedly failed to act against a professor who allegedly sexually harassed the postgradua­te student, and also works for one of the department’s hospitals.

The student declined to comment, citing fears of victimisat­ion and suspension after tweeting about her ordeal this week.

“I’m a UCT student raped by a UCT professor on UCT premises. I reported thus (sic) to UCT & for months they failed to act/suspend (the) rapist. UCT has instructed me to not report the matter & keep it ‘internal’. I received threats from (the) rapist. I’m in witness protection.”

The details are laid bare in the investigat­ion sanctioned by the Department of Health. The document showed that the incidents began as racial discrimina­tion and escalated to sexual and physical harassment at one of the hospitals where the student worked.

Two other professors were also fingered in the report after they allegedly made sexually suggestive remarks to the student.

The investigat­ion concluded in February. The incidents spanned two years, and the alleged rape was in March last year.

According to the complainan­t, as stated in the report, the professor first made comments about her body, hips, large lips and dark body. It further stated that when the complainan­t was alone with the professor, who is also her head of department, she told him about her experience of abuse and feeling ostracised. The professor allegedly told her he was the most powerful person in the department and that she was beautiful, before telling her she should go home and learn bedroom skills and open her legs instead of reading books.

The report stated that the professor allegedly touched her inappropri­ately and forced himself on her.

The student told investigat­ors she froze while all this was happening before storming out of the office and being chased after by the secretary, who wondered what was happening.

During the investigat­ion, it was agreed that the student would be supervised by a different professor, but this recommenda­tion was not upheld by the department. Findings by the investigat­or were based on the interview with the student, and with her mental state and presentati­on, it was likely that the physical sexual harassment had occurred as described in her account.

The investigat­ion also found there were sufficient grounds to proceed with a precaution­ary suspension of the professor pending further investigat­ion because the professor presented a threat to the student and other employees, and the conduct complained of was of a very serious nature.

Despite the findings, the professor was never suspended nor faced any action. When approached for comment, UCT and the Department of Health confirmed that they were investigat­ing the allegation­s but did not comment on the report and or whether any action had been taken against the professor.

This prompted UCT vice-chancellor Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng to tweet: “This student has refused help from the university. She must say what her real agenda is. Please help her because she has declined all help from us. It’s been three years. Perhaps she will accept help from you. With us, she prefers to pop up every now and then to make this allegation against me.”

Phakeng’s response drew criticism from social media, with users calling the “deputy mother”, as she is affectiona­tely known, evil and telling her to retract the tweet.

“UCT is not at liberty to discuss this further in the public domain but can state that the matter is being dealt with and reviewed by the relevant and appropriat­e independen­t investigat­ion panels,” said UCT spokespers­on Elijah Moholola. “The independen­t investigat­ion must be allowed to conclude.”

Health spokespers­on Mark van der Heever said the department and UCT had a zero tolerance policy on sexual abuse, racism or bullying, which was why they appointed an investigat­or to look into the sexual abuse allegation­s.

“The student has refused to meet with the investigat­ing officer. UCT and the department have both made psychosoci­al support available to the student on several occasions which she has also not accepted. This investigat­ion is ongoing. The allegation of rape is being investigat­ed by the SAPS.”

The SRC expressed outrage with regards to the response by the VC on Twitter. “It is through such victimblam­ing and intimidati­ng responses that GBV in the institutio­n is a hot spot,” read the statement.

Police also confirmed that they were investigat­ing a rape case and attempts on the student’s life, but no arrests had been made so far.

“The under mentioned matters, Woodstock Rape and Cape Town Central Assault with the intent to do grievous bodily harm are currently under investigat­ion at the FCS Unit Cape Town. No person has been arrested at this stage, investigat­ions continue. The investigat­ion officer is Detective Captain Willie Reyneveld of Cape Town FCS,” police said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa