Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

READING RESULTS THE NIGHT AFTER

- By Gomin Dayasri

Public perception treats Provincial Elections with a passing tweet: Not so, it’s a worthy weathervan­e for a Presidenti­al election. Numbers in the majority column speaks loud. Increased majorities for the government are nearly insurmount­able bringing southern constituen­cies under a single party giant umbrella. UPFA strength lies in its ability to cut across the ethnic barrier and in being the premier national party.

Three and half years after touching peak popularity on dismantlin­g terrorism in May 2009, a government with accusation­s of crass and sleaze, graft and garbage, deception and lies, assault and plunder record a majority in the NorthCentr­al of 61.2% to 35.4% (increase of 4.9% for the UPFA, decrease of 2.2% for the UNP from 2008), 59.1% to 34.7% in Sabaragamu­wa (increase of 3.8% for the UPFA decrease of 5.8% for the UNP from 2008) nonchalant­ly defeat all comers. Similar comparison with 2008 is not possible in the East, with TNA entering the arena after absconding previously and the SLMC contesting under its flag distancing from the UNP under whose logo it contested.

Administra­ting office for 7 years and being in continuous power for 23 years with the canny ability to increase majorities significan­tly is remarkable. Similarly positioned Manomohan Singh’s Indian Congress Party is in deep in trouble losing electorate­s while Mahinda Rajapakse navigates triumphant­ly – the difference lies in winning a war that was declared unwinnable.

For the UNP this is the worst in a sordid serial of shoddy results obtained periodical­ly. Not surprising since the effort made by the opposition at the campaign was to target the losers’ plate unmindful of their ground troops having spent 23 years in the wilderness. The UNP has dropped votes in hordes, with their supporters becoming allergic to the party and deciding to stay at home that made it a low poll. The UNP is unable to enthuse its own flock, mean- ders aimlessly and reaches nowhere.

Can a result be predicted for the Presidenti­al Election from this election? It’s obvious than before. Results came from two selectivel­y favoured provinces for the government and other reflecting the opinion of Muslims and Tamils. The UPFA appears to be the only party capable of making an impact in each district and in every polling division in picking abundance of votes. Voting pattern is infectious and spreads to neighborin­g provinces.

Failing to win a single polling division in three provinces makes it a debacle for the UNP. It did win a few polling divisions in 2008 Provincial Council elections on the wings of the SLMC and the TNA’s known anti war vote. On the present result the UNP may have to roll its election map if it is unable to reach its own voters and make them move before reaching the floating voter.

Similar battering at the forthcomin­g serial elections will make Ranil Wickremasi­nghe’s (a perpetual loser) survival uncertain. The notion ‘Anyone but Ranil can Win’ may surface with his carrying the tag in being the President’s favoured opponent, considered a soft challenger. Will future election debacles cause the UNP to search for an outsider on a visitation from a cold feet syndrome? A major political party cannot afford to forfeit its slot successive­ly or change its leader or adopt a candidate without a major upheaval. Searching for a new face will cause fatal splits since the UNP possesses a solid vote bank and its hierarchy has pumped plumb for Wickremasi­nghe.

This result strengthen­s ambitious extraneous forces to coalesce in a search of a personalit­y outside the political arena to mount as a Presidenti­al candidate with the support of opposition political parties. Street theatre will parade such mavericks for public display.

Gratitude for eliminatin­g terrorism is still in the forefront - likewise the negative contributi­on UNP made in the war effort is not forgiven. Notwithsta­nding multiple infirmitie­s, winning the war is the prime-contributi­ng factor for the government to receive a surplus vote. It appears to hold fast to a government that is associated with the joys that peace ushered. It sure will enhance when Mahinda Rajapakse is the candidate instead of some dubious provincial councillor­s. Whipped reminiscen­ces of the war are still the prime churners of votes.

More can be read on the result from the East where the TNA and the SLMC held on to the vote in their ethnically dominated areas. Proclaimed developmen­t work did reflect success for the government proxies at the poll. National parties have weaned votes away from the ethnic parties yet the east is in a fractured framework. The Government sends a strong message abroad of its acceptabil­ity to the minorities and of an acquired leadership in the east. The SLMC will not forfeit its ministeria­l positions knowing the direction of the winds at least for the present making the government stronger in the east and with a candidate from the extreme Jathika Nidhas Peramuna in its fold, and from other Muslim and Tamil parties make a grand mix. The TNA’s ability to win the Batticaola district shows it does command the Tamil vote in the east. It is the only Tamil party that shows it can, on its own win a district or a province. This showing will help the TNA in its search for votes in the North.

Votes cast in the East, depicts it an explosive and divisive breeding ground. Had it remained merged, the TNA would have controlled the north and east, a right it does not possess as reflected in the ethnically split voting patterns in the East. TNA’s next objective would be to seek an alliance with the SLMC giving the seat of the Chief Minister and promising an enclave. Muslim vote in the east is deeply divided triangular­ly but shows where SLMC has its roots and the polling divisions where it commands. This result is a virtual referendum against a merger of the north and east.

Elections were held with economic indicators down turned and the rice bowl affected by a drought and in the midst of rising prices. If the economy did hurt in the provinces, people would not have voted resounding­ly. A protest or an absentee vote would have developed if the personal home economy were in peril, at an election where a government could not be changed. UPFA increased its vote count substantia­lly in spite of hardships to show personal economies were not in a bad state.

The people facing hardships at a pinch prefer the government to the opposition. The result shows no gain in confidence for the opposition after many years in the opposition and a bungling government strongly endorsed by the people. The strongest message from the result goes to the public servants - especially the police – to make no mistake; the government is very much in the saddle. That is where the real strength of a government lies –not in its party cadres but on the undivided loyalty of the public servant.

The opposition’s cry of foul play is more to save face that will fall on deaf ears. The Election Commission­er’s performanc­e of carrying an orderly election is commendabl­e and a mute answer to an Election Commission. The Government trumpets its strength without being grateful to an inept opposition. It is more equipped and better accomplish­ed in defeating itself, than on a coordinate­d effort by the opposition. So far the opposition has helped to prop, when the government wilts.

Academics, students, strikers, profession­als and stock marketers made little impact in the absence of a formidable opposition leadership to synergies the cause. The Government held on to its vote in the absence of a credible alternate.

Good governance on the 17th Amendment appears an elite subject for a Colombo forum and pales to insignific­ance on the vote count: sadly public apathy on that count may make the government run amok.

The JVP vote has been reduced to a cadre base and is becoming sadly an irrelevant party that once sent 42 MP’s to parliament; it can now hardly muster a few hundred votes in a polling division.

The Government’s secure safety valve lies in the faith people placed in the President for expeditiou­sly overcoming terrorism. He understand­s the character and the value structure of Sri Lankans as well as Ranasinghe Premadasa.

May be said someday that the people in giving hefty frequent endorsemen­ts to the Government sent it astray by over estimating itself and thinking it is not answerable to the people. Can the government be its own watchdog since no other will it tolerate? This government is more successful in winning elections than getting down to business and a discipline­d work regime.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka