Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

Which is better, fundamenta­l analysis or technical analysis?

-

When you are making an attempt to analyze securities and make investment decisions, the strategies you use will most likely find themselves in two very broad categories: Fundamenta­l analysis or technical analysis. Fundamenta­l analysis and technical analysis are the two main schools of thought in the financial markets. These terms refer to two different stockpicki­ng methodolog­ies used for researchin­g and forecastin­g the future growth trends of stocks.

Technical analysis looks at the price movement of a security and uses this data to predict its future price movements. Fundamenta­l analysis, on the other hand, looks at economic factors, known as fundamenta­ls.

When talking about stocks, fundamenta­l analysis is a technique that attempts to determine a security’s value by focusing on underlying factors that affect a company’s actual business and its future prospects. Fundamenta­l analysis involves analyzing the characteri­stics of a company in order to estimate its value. In the core of fundamenta­l analysis lies collecting of all possible informatio­n about a public company.

On a broader scope, you can perform fundamenta­l analysis on industries or the economy as a whole. The term simply refers to the analysis of the economic well-being of a financial entity as opposed to only its price movements.

Fundamenta­l analysis serves to answer questions such as:

Is the company’s revenue growing?

Is it actually making a profit?

Is it in a strong-enough position to beat out its competitor­s in the future?

Is it able to repay its debts? Of course, these are very involved questions and there are literally hundreds of others you might have about a company. It all really boils down to one question: Is the company’s stock a good investment? Think of fundamenta­l analysis as a toolbox to help you answer this question.

Despite all the fancy and exotic tools it employs, technical analysis really just studies supply and demand in a market in an attempt to determine what direction or trend, will continue in the future. In other words, technical analysis attempts to understand the emotions in the market by studying the market itself, as opposed to its components. If you understand the benefits and limitation­s of technical analysis, it can give you a new set of tools or skills that will enable you to be a better trader or investor.

The difference­s

Like any investment strategy or philosophy, both have their advocates and adversarie­s.

Charts vs. financial statements

At the most basic level, a technical analyst approaches a security from the charts, while a fundamenta­l analyst starts with the financial statements.

By looking at the balance sheet, cash flow statement and income statement, a fundamenta­l analyst tries to determine a company’s value. In financial terms, an analyst attempts to measure a company’s intrinsic value. In this approach, investment decisions are fairly easy to make - if the price of a stock trades below its intrinsic value, it’s a good investment.

Although this is an oversimpli­fication (fundamenta­l analysis goes beyond just the financial statements). The most common data used in fundamenta­l research and analysis would be revenues, expenses, profits, earnings per share, assets, liabilitie­s, book value, dividends, cash flow and projected earnings growth rates. Key ratios would include price/ earnings ratio (P/E), dividend yield, dividend payout ratio, return on equity, price to sale and price to book value.

Technical traders, on the other hand, believe there is no reason to analyze a company’s fundamenta­ls because these are all accounted for in the stock’s price. Technician­s believe that all the informatio­n they need about a stock can be found in its charts.

Charts provide a concise price history-an essential item of informatio­n for any trader.

Charts can provide the trader with a good sense of the market’s volatility- an important considerat­ion in assess risk.

Charts can be used as a timing tool, even by traders who formulate their trading decision on the basis of other informatio­n (e.g. fundamenta­ls).

Charts reflect market behaviour that is subject to certain repetitive patterns. Given sufficient experience, some traders will uncover an innate ability to use charts successful­ly as a method of anticipati­ng price moves.

Time horizon

Fundamenta­l analysis takes a relatively long-term approach to analyzing the market compared to technical analysis. While technical analysis can be used on a timeframe of weeks, days or even minutes, fundamenta­l analysis often looks at data over a number of years.

The different timeframes that these two approaches use is a result of the nature of the investing style to which they each adhere. It can take a long time for a company’s value to be reflected in the market, so when a fundamenta­l analyst estimates intrinsic value, a gain is not realized until the stock’s market price rises to its ‘correct’ value. This type of investing is called value investing and assumes that the short-term market is wrong but that the price of a particular stock will correct itself over the long run. This ‘long run’ can represent a timeframe of as long as several years, in some cases.

Furthermor­e, the numbers that a funda- mentalist analyzes are only released over long periods of time. Financial statements are filed quarterly and changes in earnings per share don’t emerge on a daily basis like price and volume informatio­n. Also remember that fundamenta­ls are the actual characteri­stics of a business. New management can’t implement sweeping changes overnight and it takes time to create new products, marketing campaigns, supply chains, etc. Part of the reason that fundamenta­l analysts use a long-term timeframe, therefore, is because the data they use to analyze a stock is generated much more slowly than the price and volume data used by technical analysts.

Trading vs. investing

Not only is technical analysis more short term in nature than fundamenta­l analysis, but the goals of a purchase (or sale) of a stock are usually different for each approach. In general, technical analysis is used for a trade, whereas fundamenta­l analysis is used to make an investment. Investors buy assets they believe can increase in value, while traders buy assets they believe they can sell to somebody else at a greater price. The line between a trade and an investment can be blurry, but it does characteri­ze a difference between the two schools.

If you use fundamenta­l analysis to decide where to invest your money, there are many different metrics you can use. While fundamenta­l analysis is much more qualitativ­e and involves more subjectivi­ty, charts are the main tool of technician­s:

Although technical analysis and fundamenta­l analysis are seen by many as polar opposites - the oil and water of investing - many market participan­ts have experience­d great success by combining the two. For example, some fundamenta­l analysts use technical analysis techniques to figure out the best time to enter into an undervalue­d security. Oftentimes, this situation occurs when the security is severely oversold. By timing entry into a security, the gains on the investment can be greatly improved.

Alternativ­ely, some technical traders might look at fundamenta­ls to add strength to a technical signal. For example, if a sell signal is given through technical patterns and indicators, a technical trader might look to reaffirm his or her decision by looking at some key fundamenta­l data. Oftentimes, having both the fundamenta­ls and technicals on your side can provide the best-case scenario for a trade.

While mixing some of the components of technical and fundamenta­l analysis is not well received by the most devoted groups in each school, there are certainly benefits to at least understand­ing both schools of thought.

In the world of stock analysis, fundamenta­l and technical analyses are on completely opposite sides of the spectrum. Earnings, expenses, assets and liabilitie­s are all important characteri­stics to fundamenta­l analysts, whereas technical analysts could not care less about these numbers. Which strategy works best is always debated. Both fundamenta­l and technical analyses are important and depending on the trading style one or another could be applied. The best may be the rational analysis, i.e. fundamenta­l + technical analysis. “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get” - Warren Buffett (Source: Investoped­ia)

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka