Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

NORTHERN PROVINCE CHIEF MINISTERIA­L CANDIDATE

-

Somasuntha­ram Senathiraj­ah alias “Mavai” Senathiraj­ah of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) has set his sights on the Northern Province Chief Minister post. The six foot septuagena­rian currently representi­ng Jaffna district in Parliament has staked his claim to be the newly constitute­d Northern Provincial Council’s first elected Chief Minister in an intriguing political move that is seemingly defiant of the intentions of TNA Parliament­ary group leader Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan on this issue. Senathiraj­ah along with his supporters has also launched a multi-pronged campaign with the aim of boosting his claim to be Chief Minister.

Sampanthan the veteran Tamil leader representi­ng Trincomale­e district in Parliament wants to nominate retired Chief Justice C.V. Wigneswara­n as the chief ministeria­l candidate of the TNA. There is strong support for Wigneswara­n’s candidacy among influentia­l sections of the TNA both in Sri Lanka and abroad. Likewise t here is opposition too. Wigneswara­n himself had been wavering and vacillatin­g about agreeing to be the TNA’s chief ministeria­l candidate. Finally when Wigneswara­n like the Dickensian Barkis was “willing” Senathiraj­ah has thrown his hat into the ring upsetting Sampanthan’s calculatio­ns.

Given the current political mood in the predominan­tly Tamil Northern Province most observers and analysts opine that the TNA which is the premier political configurat­ion of Sri Lankan Tamils would romp home easily if a free and fair election is held for the Northern Provincial Council. The debate if any is only over the margin of victory they say. In that context the expectatio­n is that any person nominated as chief ministeria­l candidate by the TNA is certain to win and be duly sworn in as the first ever chief minister of t he Northern Province. This notion of “Jayasikuru­i” (certain victory) has infused the Northern chief ministeria­l stakes with competitiv­e excitement.

The coordinati­ng committee recently set up by the TNA to oversee matters concerning the forthcomin­g Northern Provincial poll which met on Thursday July 11th evening in Colombo failed to arrive at a decision on the issue of nominating the chief ministeria­l candidate due to the clash of choice between Senathiraj­ah and Wigneswara­n. It was then decided to hold another meeting on Friday July 12th.The interregnu­m is likely to be utilised by both lobbies to persuade each other to compromise. It is however doubtful whether Sampanthan would be able to convince Senathiraj­ah that he should stand down on this issue. It is quite discernibl­e that Senathiraj­ah is mastermind­ing a campaign for nomination that would not relent without achieving its objective. Besides the TNA contests under the house symbol of the Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK) Senathiraj­ah is the secretary of the ITAK.

WIGNESWARA­N

Moreover, underhand methods are being adopted to pressurise Wigneswara­n into pulling out from the race. Lacking guts to confront the retired Justice directly, Mavai’s minions are conducting an orchestrat­ed media campaign to dissuade

W Wigneswara­n from contest- ing. The idea is to increase the heat systematic­ally so that the ex-Judge would voluntaril­y exit the kitchen.

The tussle for chief ministeria­l candidacy brings the TNA under the spotlight. This column has in the past focused often on the dissension within the five constituen­ts of the Tamil National Alliance. Earlier the main bone of contention was between the Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK) and the other four members of the alliance. Fortunatel­y for the TNA those difference­s were put on the backburner as elections to the North became a distinct possibilit­y. Unfortunat­ely for the TNA the advent of elections that brought about unity on one front now heralds disunity on another.

When the Tamil National Alliance came into being in 2001 it had four constituen­t members. The press communique issued on October 22nd 2001 heralding the formation of the Tamil National Alliance was signed by four persons representi­ng the Tamil United Liberation Front, All Ceylon Tamil Congress, Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisati­on and Eelam People’s Revolution­ary Liberation Front. They were R.Sampanthan (TULF), N. Kumarakuru­paran (ACTC) N. Srikantha (TELO) and K.Premachand­ran (EPRLF). Kumarakuru­paran is now with Mano Ganesan’s Democratic People’s Front.

The ITAK was not in the picture when the TNA was formed originally. The Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi known as the Federal Party was then the primary component of the Tamil United Liberation Front. The ITAK or Federal party had together with three other parties formed the Tamil United Front (TUF) in 1971. The TUF was born again as a new avatar known as the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) in May 1976.

VICTORY

It was under the Sun symbol that the TULF contested the 1977 July elections and obtained a sweeping victory winning 18 out of 19 Tamil majority electorate­s in the North and East.

The newly formed Tamil National Alliance of 2001 contested under the TULF symbol Sun. Parliament­ary polls in December 2001 saw the TNA getting fifteen seats including a national list MP. The TULF President of that time Murugesu Sivasitham­param was appointed national list MP. Of the fifteen TNA seats the TULF had seven, TELO had four, ACTC had three and the EPRLF one. The TNA then contested under the aegis of the TULF. The electoral symbol of the TNA then was the Sun, which was portrayed politicall­y as the rising sun or Uthayasoor­iyan.

The TNA tryst with the Sun symbol had a short time span. After Sivasitham­baram’s demise Veerasingh­am Anandasang­aree became President of the TULF. Sangaree soon fell foul of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in trying to assert and uphold the independen­ce and dignity of the TULF. This led to the LTTE pressurisi­ng the TULF to remove their president from office and deprive him of his MP seat. The bulk of the TULF capitulate­d and Anandasang­aree was removed from party office. Sangaree however went to courts challengin­g his removal.

There was also legal wrangling over who was entitled to the Sun symbol. While the court case was in progress Parliament­ary elections were called in April 2004.While a faction of the TULF led by Anandasang­aree contested outside the TNA, the bulk of the TULF under Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan contested as part of the TNA. With a court case on, both sides could not use the election symbol ‘Sun.’ Sangaree fielded an Independen­t list under the symbol ‘Lock.’ Later on after elections courts ruled in favour of Sangaree who is now in possession of the Sun symbol.

The TNA deprived of the Sun symbol opted for the ITAK symbol ‘House’ in 2004. Thus the dormant Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi obtained a fresh lease of life. While Sampanthan was the President Somasundar­am Senathiraj­ah known as “Maavai” Senathiraj­ah functioned as ITAK General Secretary.

ELECTIONS

The 2010 elections saw the TNA contesting under the ITAK symbol of ‘House’ winning decisively. It had fourteen seats including a national list MP. The lawyer M.A. Sumanthira­n was appointed TNA national list MP. The thirteen elected MPs were R. Sampanthan from Trincomale­e; S . Senathiraj­ah, K. Premachand­ran, A V Vinayagamo­orthy, E.Saravanaba­van, S. Shritharan from Jaffna; A. Adaikkalan­athan, S. Vinoharath­alingam, S. Ananthan, from Wanni; P. Selvarasa, P. Ariyanenth­ran, S. Yo g eswaran from Batticaloa and P. Piyasena from Amparai respective­ly.

An interestin­g feature of post - 2010 election Tamil politics was increasing pressure on the TNA to both enlarge its membership and concretise its structural unity. Parallel to this pressure was the renaissanc­e and assertion of the ITAK while remaining within TNA folds. The mounting pressure on the one hand for the TNA to restructur­e itself as a single party and the determinat­ion of the ITAK rank and file to preserve its distinct identity on the other caused an intraTNA crisis.

Of the original four parties that formed the TNA the All Ceylon Tamil Congress is now out as the ACTC is now functionin­g separately by providing its facilities and symbol to the Tamil National Peoples Front. Vinayagamo­orthy elected as MP in 2010 is no longer with the Tamil Congress and is functionin­g independen­tly within the TNA. The TNA now consisted of three parties but soon there were two additions.

The TULF under Aanandasan­garee and the PLOTE under Dharmaling­am Siddhartha­n together with the EPRLF faction headed by Thirunavuk­karsu Sreetharan alias Sugu had been functionin­g as a loose combine for a while. Influentia­l sections of the Global Tamil Diaspora began exerting pressure on Tamil parties in Sri Lanka to unite. These sentiments were reflected in the Sri Lankan mainstream Tamil media.

In such a situation both the TULF and PLOTE were taken into the TNA. The EPRLF faction led by Sugu could not join the TNA due to stubborn opposition by Suresh Premachand­ran who insisted that his EPRLF was the sole EPRLF. The TNA now comprises five political parties.

TRIUMVIRAT­E

The asymmetric­al strength and dominance of the ITAK was resented by the other four parties. A particular accusation was that the triumvirat­e consisting of Sampanthan, Senathiraj­ah and Sumanthira­n made all the important decisions without duly consulting others. There was also a demand that the TNA should be formally registered as a political party and inner party structures be set up. The idea was to downsize the ITAK and make it on par with the other parties. The ITAK was not budging.

It was in this situation that the prospect of Northern Provincial Council elections loomed large on the political horizon. It was very necessary at this juncture for the TNA to patch up difference­s and forge unity to meet the challenge. The ITAK realising the need to harness all resources of its constituen­t partners for the election adopted a course of flexible adjustment. It opted to be on par with the other parties in this matter.

The ITAK agreed to set up a committee of all five constituen­ts to coordinate matters concerning the Northern poll. Initially a fifteen member committee comprising three representa­tives from each party was set up. Later it was increased to twenty with four each for a party. The nominees on this committee from the ITAK were Parliament­arians Senathiraj­ah, Selvarajah, Sumanthira­n and Shritharan. TNA leader Sampanthan was not in it. However the other parties requested that Sampanthan should chair the committee. Thus it was expanded to twenty-one with Sampanthan at the helm.

Three other smaller committees were set up under the purview of the Coordinati­ng or “Orunginaip­puk Kuzhu”. The committee in charge of election propaganda has ten members with two from each party. The finance and nomination committees had five members each. The five constituen­ts had a representa­tive each on these committees.

NOMINATION­S

With the Elections Commission­er calling for nomination­s to the Northern council from July 25th to August 1st the TNA coordinati­ng committee met at the TNA office in Colombo on Thursday. Those present were R. Sampanthan, Mavai Senathiraj­ah, P.Selvarajah and MA Sumanthira­n -ITAK, A. Adaikalana­than (Selvam), N Srikantha, Henry Mahenthira­n and “Jana” Karunakara­n –TELO, Kandiah Premachand­ran (Suresh) R.Thurairatn­am and K. Sarveswara­n -EPRLF, S. Sangiah and G.Krishnapil­lai TULF and D. Siddhartha­n, K. Sivanesan, and S.Ragavan - PLOTE. The meeting was convened primarily to select the chief ministeria­l candidate. With Senathiraj­ah refusing to toe Sampanthan’s line the proceeding­s were postponed.

The run up of events leading to the collision course between Sampanthan and Senathiraj­ah are rather revealing. While exposing the fault lines in the making of the TNA it also lays bare the sheer hypocrisy of power hungry politician­s masqueradi­ng as self-sacrificin­g leaders of their community. It also brings into focus the influence of extraneous forces over Tamil politics in Sri Lanka.

When elections to the Eastern Provincial Council were first held in 2008 the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were still a fighting force in the North. So the TNA functionin­g then as a mouthpiece of the tigers was not permitted to contest. The TNA sought to justify its stance by saying it would not contest Provincial elections as the North –East merger was no longer in existence. It also harped on its familiar cry of the 13th Amendment being inadequate.

When elections to the Eastern council were held for the second time last year the LTTE had been defeated militarily and was no longer a constraini­ng factor on the TNA. Besides there was a very good chance of the TNA doing well enough to capture power in the Eastern province. So the TNA contested and fared extremely well. Had the Muslim Congress been willing, the TNA, SLMC and UNP could have formed the Eastern administra­tion together.

NATIONALIS­M

That was not to be! But the Eastern performanc­e whetted the TNA appetite towards the anticipate­d Northern provincial poll. The magic of Tamil nationalis­m that worked wonders in the East would work equally well in the North too. Besides emotional issues such as the prevailing military presence, appropriat­ion of lands and houses for security purposes etc would provide a rousing platform to garner Tamil votes. It seemed a foregone conclusion that the TNA would capture power in the North. The questions were how many seats will it win? And who would be the chief minister?

Initially the latter question had many contenders vying to be the answer. Among the names being bandied or talked about as potential chief ministeria­l candidates were retired Jaffna university professor S.K. Sittambala­m, ex-Jaffna Municipal Commission­er C.V.K. Sivagnanam, Colombo University Law Professor V.T. Thamilmara­n, Retired Jaffna High Court Judge E.T. Vicknaraja­h and former “Uthayan” newspaper Editor N. Vithiyatha­ran. If these were spoken of as contenders outside active politics there were aspirants from within political parties too. Somasuntha­ram Senathiraj­ah of ITAK, Kandiah Premachand­ran alias Suresh of EPRLF, MK Sivajiling­am of TELO also evinced interest in the chief ministeria­l stakes at one point of time. Other possibilit­ies for the Chief minister post were veteran Politician Veerasingh­am Aanandasan­garee of the TULF and Dharmaling­am Siddhartha­n of the PLOTE. Two other names spoken about were former Mannar MP P. Soosaithas­an and SC Chandrahas­an the son of respected Tamil leader S.J.V. Chelvanaya­gam or “Thanthai Selva”.

It appeared that the prevalent fragile unity of the TNA might shatter over the huge competitio­n to be chief minister. It was in this situation that TNA leader Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan thought of bringing in a complete outsider with exemplary qualificat­ions and unimpeacha­ble credential­s as chief ministeria­l candidate. His choice was retired Supreme Court Judge C.V. Wigneswara­n whose name had been proposed to the TNA leadership by members of the Tamil elite in Sri Lanka and abroad.

COSMOPOLIT­AN

Justice Wigneswara­n though of Jaffna origin had grown up in Colombo studying at Royal College. He had a distinguis­hed record at the bar before mounting the bench. He had made a name for himself after retirement by making erudite, courageous speeches on different occasions. Be it matters affecting the Tamil community in particular or issues relating to the country at large such as independen­ce of the Judiciary, Vigneswara­n had spoken out loud and clear. He had not hesitated to speak truth to power. Essentiall­y a cosmopolit­an, Wigneswara­n also retained strong Hindu links.

Sampanthan felt that Wigneswara­n was the ideal choice for a number of reasons.Given his qualificat­ions and experience and his track record while on the bench and afterwards, Wigneswara­n was sure to attract votes immensely in the North. If Douglas Devananda was to be the chief Govt candidate then pitting a person of Vigneswara­n’s calibre could virtually transform the hustings into a one horse race.

It was also necessary to have a man of eminence like Wigneswara­n as Northern chief minister at this historic juncture. The new chief minister would have to meet with the Colombo Govt on a number of matters. He needs to negotiate with the Govt for more powers, resources and functions for the council. He must possess the ability to interact on equal terms with the Governor and military hierarchy in the North. He must also be able to deal with Internatio­nal leaders, diplomats and media personnel. These required extraordin­ary attributes and ideally, Wigneswara­n seemed to fit the bill. Besides Wigneswara­n possessed legal acumen and expertise that could be of crucial importance.

More importantl­y Sampanthan also felt that the quibbling over Chief ministeria­l stakes in the TNA would end once Wigneswara­n was picked. He expected the other contenders to bow out gracefully when a man of Wigneswara­n’s mercurial stature became available. Thus internal dissension on this account could be avoided. But how wrong Sampanthan was in judging the nature of current Tamil politics in a climate where mediocrity and not merit rules the roost!

DECLINED

When approached Wigneswara­n himself was reluctant to get into active politics. He preferred to be in the background and be an adviser rather than face hustings. Also he was fully aware of the internal difference­s in the TNA and did not want to get enmeshed in a political web. He wanted a united invitation from all five TNA constituen­ts. Wigneswara­n also entertaine­d the notion that he could lead an Independen­t united list of Tamils rather than that of a political party. With such options being ruled out, Wigneswara­n respectful­ly declined the offer.

Other currents too were flowing across the Elephant Pass isthmus even as Sampanthan was wooing Wigneswara­n. While the Jaffna elite was delighted with the choice of Wigneswara­n other political elements in the ITAK were not greatly enamoured of the ex-supreme court judge. The party machinery was doubtful whether the independen­t Wigneswara­n would fit into the Jaffna political scene and abide by the decisions of the TNA. He was seen as an uncontroll­able personalit­y. So Gulliver had to be restrained by the Lilliputia­ns.

Jaffna district MP and ITAK secretary general “Mavai” Senathiraj­ah was encouraged to contest. His name had been in the running for quite a while but was not thought of positively as chief minister material earlier. Besides Suresh Premachand­ran of the EPRLF had ambitions of his own and regarded the genial Senathiraj­ah as a pushover. Senathiraj­ah himself had qualms about being getting involved with a Provincial council that lacked adequate powers. Also he had no intention of trying to replace Wigneswara­n as the TNA choice at that stage.

The situation however changed when Wigneswara­n turned the offer down. Senathiraj­ah was worried that the TNA may pick Aanandasan­garee as chief ministeria­l candidate. This would have been a bitter pill for Senathiraj­ah to swallow. Although Sangaree was responsibl­e for making Senathiraj­ah national list MP after the assassinat­ion of Dr.Neelan Tiruchelva­m in 1999, the relationsh­ip had later soured. Though both were now in the TNA there was much friction between them. Under these circumstan­ces Senathiraj­ah decided to seek chief ministeria­l candidacy himself. His resolve to do so was strengthen­ed further after the TNA concluded its New Delhi trip. Canvassing began and other TNA constituen­ts were approached.

SENATHIRAJ­AH

Sampanthan however had not given up on Wigneswara­n. The TNA leader continued his efforts to convince Wigneswara­n that he should become chief minister. TNA national list MP and Lawyer MA Sumanthira­n was of yeoman service to Sampanthan in this. Several prominent Tamils in Sri Lanka and abroad kept on requesting Wigneswara­n to say “yes.” After persistent efforts by the TNA duo and others, Wigneswara­n finally consented. Senathiraj­ah was informed about Wigneswara­n being willing. Senathiraj­ah was not happy but did not protest. A campaign was already on to promote Senathiraj­ah for the chief minister candidacy.

70 year old Somasuntha­ram Senathiraj­ah was born on October 27th 1942. He hails from Maaviddapu­ram in Valigamam North. The shortened form of Maaviddapu­ram in contempora­ry Tamil usage is “Maavai”. Hence Senathiraj­ah is popularly referred to as “Mavai” Senathiraj­ah. Maaviddapu­ram falls under the Kankesanth­urai constituen­cy long represente­d in Parliament by SJV Chelvanaya­gam and later Appapillai Amirthalin­gam.

Senathiraj­ah was a youth activist of the ITAK also known as the Federal Party. He engaged in many protest demonstrat­ions and was arrested in 1972 by the United Front Govt of Sirima Bandaranai­ke. He along with 41 others was detained at Welikada for many years. The FP newspaper “Suthanthir­an” promoted Mavai Senathiraj­ah, poet Kasi Anandan and Vannai Aanandan among the 42 detenues by focussing on their incarcerat­ion specifical­ly. This contribute­d to the trio gaining cult status among Tamil youths of an earlier generation.

Senathiraj­ah was released in 1975 and rearrested after the assassinat­ion of Jaffna Mayor Alfred Dorayappa in July the same year. He was released in 1977 and participat­ed in the July 1977 election campaign where the TULF captured 18 seats on a platform for separation. Senathiraj­ah now headed the TULF youth front known as “Ilaingar Peravai”. He was jailed on two occasions during the 1977 -83 period.

Mavai relocated to Chennai after the 1983 July violence and functioned as the man-incharge of the TULF office there. After the assassinat­ion of Amirthalin­gam by the LTTE in 1989, Senathiraj­ah demanded that he be appointed to fill the national list vacancy and became MP.

ELECTED

In 1994 Senathiraj­ah contested in the Amparai district but failed to get elected. When Dr.Neelan Tiruchelva­m was killed by the LTTE in 1999, Senathiraj­ah was appointed in his stead. Senathiraj­ah contested in Jaffna on the TULF ticket in 2000 and was elected to Parliament. He was elected again to Parliament from Jaffna in 2001, 2004 and 2010 respective­ly.

It is apparent that Mavai Senathiraj­ah is aiming to be Northern chief minister. The opening gambit was when the Jaffna branch of the ITAK passed a resolution demanding that Senathiraj­ah be made chief minister candidate. Sampanthan countered it by saying an appropriat­e decision would be made by the entire TNA in due course.

Thereafter news items were planted in a Tamil newspaper saying that the TELO, PLOTE and EPRLF were supportive of Senathiraj­ah’s candidacy. In a bizarre twist an ex-Municipal councillor in Jaffna threat- ened self-immolation if “Mavai Annan”(elder brother) was not given nomination. Senathiraj­ah himself was seemingly non committal in a bid to convey the image of being disinteres­ted in the post but upon hearing Wigneswara­n was now willing to contest “Mavai” declared his intention to seek chief minister office by issuing a press statement. However he mentioned in the statement that he would abide by the party decision taken by the TNA coordinati­ng committee.

A multi-pronged media campaign is now underway to secure Senathiraj­ah’s nomination as chief ministeria­l candidate of the Tamil National Alliance. Vicious attacks are being launched in sections of the Tamil media against Wigneswara­n and the Sampanthan-Sumanthira­n duo. Wigneswara­n is being vilified as elitist and as a Colombo Tamil. He is being depicted as a man who had lived outside Jaffna and therefore not a son of the soil like Mavai.

ARIYANENTH­IRAN

A venomous statement was issued by Batticaloa district TNA parliament­arian P. Ariyanenth­iran as part of this campaign. He derisively referred to Wigneswara­n as a man who knew only the Nallur temple whereas Senathiraj­ah was familiar with all parts of the North and East. Ariyanenth­iran also accused Wigneswara­n of being enmeshed with Sinhala majoritari­anism as his children were married to Sinhalese. Therefore Wigneswara­n’s Tamil nationalis­t credential­s were suspect, alleged Ariyanenth­iran.

The aim of the pro-Senathiraj­ah campaign seems to be that of targeting Wigneswara­n through the media and compelling him to opt out of the chief ministeria­l stakes. Since Wigneswara­n has been reluctant to plunge into active politics the campaigner­s hope to draw blood by attacking the Colombo based Ex –Judge on a low personal level. If that does happen and Wigneswara­n throws in the towel, then the field would be clear for Mavai Senathiraj­ah who would then allow himself to be propelled into chief minister candidacy in deference to the wishes of the TNA.

On the other hand Sampanthan would keep trying to persuade Senathiraj­ah to drop out of the race. It is however a multicrore question as to whether Mavai would comply. It is noteworthy that Senathiraj­ah’s candidatur­e at the coordinati­ng committee is being sponsored by members of other constituen­t parties and not the ITAK. It is learnt that Sampanthan has been waxing eloquent on the merits of Wigneswara­n and the imperative need to make him the chief minister. Whether Sampanthan can move minds that are already made up remains to be seen. Sampanthan as a last resort may threaten to quit his position in the TNA. If that happens Senathiraj­ah may have to reconsider. The TNA cannot afford to lose Sampanthan in the current environmen­t.

It is against this backdrop that the TNA coordinati­ng committee would be meeting to select the chief minister candidate. It is very likely that the decision would have been made by the time this column appears in print. DBS Jeyaraj can be reached at

djeyaraj20­05@yahoo.com

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Anandasang­aree
Anandasang­aree
 ??  ?? Vigneswara­n
Vigneswara­n
 ??  ?? Mavai
Mavai
 ??  ?? Sampanthan
Sampanthan
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka