Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

PARACHUTIS­TS

-

The essence of their argument however was that Wigneswara­n though of Jaffna origin was now a Tamil resident of Colombo who was born and bred there. Senathiraj­ah on the other hand was a son of the Jaf fna soil. Furthermor­e Wigneswara­n was not a member of the ITAK and had no political experience. Senathiraj­ah however was involved from his youthful days in the Tamil political struggle. He was also a founding member of the TNA. In a nutshell the argument was that the “insider” Senathiraj­ah should be preferred over the “outsider” Wigneswara­n regardless of the individual merits of both. Parachutis­ts from outside were to be debarred.

These points were well articulate­d by former TELO Parliament­arian N. Srikantha who is also a lawyer. While arguing that the Northern chief minister should be a member of the TNA and not an outsider, Srikantha deftly promoted himself also as a potential contender. Srikantha said that if Senathiraj­ah was deemed inappropri­ate because he was not a lawyer then the TNA should turn to those in the alliance before resorting to outside nomination­s. He then pointed out that Anandasang­aree and himself were also lawyers.

Srikantha evoked a strong response from Sampanthan who posed the question whether the TNA was to remain stagnant without any infusion of fresh new talent for ever and ever if the policy was to be “no outsiders”?. This meant that the party could not even register any ordinary new members. Sampanthan also pointed out that Srikantha and Senathiraj­ah from Jaffna had at one time parachuted into Trincomale­e and Amparai districts as candidates. Sampanthan made it crystal clear that his choice was Wigneswara­n only. Though he did not express it openly it appeared that the veteran politician was even ready to quit the TNA leadership if his choice was

rebuffed. As time progressed it

appeared that leaders Suresh Premachand­ran of the EPRLF, Selvam Adaikkalan­athan of TELO and Dharmaling­am Siddhartha­n of PLOTE were slowly veering around to Sampanthan’s point of view. The discussion shifted to focussing on the possibilit­y of Wigneswara­n and Senathiraj­ah working together if necessary in the Northern Council.

It was then that Senathiraj­ah broke his silence and spoke out aloud. In a bid to show that he was not a seeker of office for the sake of power the man from Maaviddapu­ram reiterated that he was seeking nomination only because many people within and outside Sri Lanka were pressing him to contest. “Not even one person who spoke to me said that I should not contest,” said Senathiraj­ah. He then said that he valued Wigneswara­n very highly and suggested that it was possible for both of them to work together in the future. The second day meeting ended on this positive note by Senathiraj­ah. It was decided that the discussion­s should continue in the afternoon of Saturday July 13th.

OPTIMISM

The concluding remarks of Senathiraj­ah gave room for optimism that a satisfacto­ry compromise could be worked out. Quiet unofficial discussion­s among individual­s and groups within the alliance began at different levels.TNA national list MP Sumanthira­n began working out a scheme where Wigneswara­n could be chief minister for the first half of the term and Senathiraj­ah for the second. Sampanthan however was not in favour of such an adjustment saying it would convey contrary impression­s to the voter and could be counterpro­ductive. Senathiraj­ah too was not very receptive to the idea saying it would be practicall­y difficult to implement such an arrangemen­t. Senathiraj­ah being a Parliament­arian was not comfortabl­e with the idea of going into the Provincial Council and waiting patiently till Wigneswara­n’s tenure was over.

Unofficial discussion­s continued. Sampanthan and Sumanthira­n continued with their efforts in promoting the candidatur­e of Wigneswara­n. Sampanthan spoke to Suresh Premachand­ran of EPRLF and Adaikkalan­athan of TELO. Both agreed in principle to Wigneswara­n being the chief ministeria­l candidate but wanted Senathiraj­ah’s concurrenc­e. Sumanthira­n began engaging Senathiraj­ah in talks over the subject. As a result of these unpublicis­ed discussion­s a new move was initiated. A meeting was arranged where Sampanthan, Senathiraj­ah, Sumanthira­n, Suresh Premachand­ran and Selvam Adaikkalan­atham were to visit Justice Wigneswara­n at his residence and discuss pertinent issues concerning the nomination. It is noteworthy that the former Supreme Court judge had not in anyway participat­ed in the TNA discussion­s tasked with selecting a chief ministeria­l candidate. Although he had agreed to be the candidate if the TNA chose him, Wigneswara­n had not tried in any way to press his claim. When people spoke to him about the protracted discussion­s within the TNA the ex-Judge had simply laughed it off saying “let them give it to anybody.” Wigneswara­n maintained a sense of detach- ment to the entire exercise as a true “Karmayogi” of the “Bhagavad Gita” would.

Selvam Adaikkalan­athan was not able to attend the meeting on Saturday morning with Wigneswara­n but the other four did so as planned. The meeting with Wigneswara­n went off very well with some doubts being cleared. Wigneswara­n stated clearly that he was prepared to contest as the TNA candidate under the ITAK symbol and not as head of an independen­t list of candidates. He also said that his only request was for all five TNA constituen­t parties to agree to his candidacy.

RAPPORT

During talks Wigneswara­n outlined the problems he anticipate­d in making the Provincial council work satisfacto­rily and how he proposed to cope with them. A highlight of the meeting was the cordial rapport establishe­d between Wigneswara­n and Senathiraj­ah. The Jaffna district MP explained that a tussle of sorts had ensued only because Justice Wigneswara­n had been reluctant to accept the offer initially. This had led to many persons pushing him (Senathiraj­ah) into the fray. However a satisfacto­ry decision would be reached soon. Wigneswara­n responded by saying he understood the situation and that everything would work out positively in the end.

The third round of talks scheduled for July 13th evening was put off for the morning of Monday July 15th. Once again during the interregnu­m, unofficial discussion­s continued at multiple levels. By Monday morning it was apparent that the pendulum had swung in favour of Wigneswara­n but there was marked reluctance on the part of TNA constituen­ts to convey news of that “swing” to Senathiraj­ah. The Jaffna district MP too began telling colleagues that he was ready to accept Wigneswara­n if the TNA wanted him. However, Senathiraj­ah hesitated to pull out on his own due to perhaps a question of “prestige”.

When the meeting began the representa­tives from the EPRLF, TELO, TULF and PLOTE spoke in favour of Wigneswara­n as being the most suitable candidate at this juncture. Yet they did not ask Senathiraj­ah to withdraw from the contest. Each one who spoke added a rider after praising Wigneswara­n as the more suitable choice. The rider was that Wigneswara­n could be the choice provided Senathiraj­ah was amenable.

MAGNANIMOU­S

This state of affairs created an uncertain situation where the TNA seemed to want both the proverbial “Koozh” (stew) and the “Meesai” (moustache). Senathiraj­ah himself resolved the dilemma by speaking out formally. Explaining the reasons behind his intent to contest , Senathiraj­ah emphasised that he had done so only because of requests by the people. He then thanked his TNA colleagues for their support and announced that he was standing down in favour of Wigneswara­n because he did not want to disrupt the unity and strength of the party. Senathiraj­ah also praised Wigneswara­n and said that he was endorsing the ExJudge’s candidatur­e. With Senathiraj­ah’s “magnanimou­s withdrawal” the problem ended. Wigneswara­n became the “unanimous choice”.

Thereafter representa­tives from all five parties of the TNA led by Senathiraj­ah went to Wigneswara­n’s residence and conveyed the “glad tidings of great joy” to him. Wigneswara­n was happy that the choice had been approved by all five parties who had come together to formally inform him of it. He was particular­ly thankful to Senathiraj­ah for his magnanimou­s conduct and stated that he was expecting his cooperatio­n and support in the future. And then they all smilingly posed for the camera.

It is rather tempting to conclude this article with the ending “and they all lived happily ever after”. Alas! such endings are possible only in fairy tales and the TNA chief ministeria­l candidate search is no fairy tale. As stated in the preliminar­y paragraphs of this article the whole exercise has exposed the facade of unity prevail- ing in the TNA. There has been a realignmen­t of forces and shifts in loyalty that do not augur well for the configurat­ion. The non –ITAK parties have been strengthen­ed at the expense of the ITAK and this is clearly visible in the reduction of nominees from ITAK on the candidate list. The powerful clique controllin­g the ITAK in Jaffna is revolting against Wigneswara­n and Sampanthan. The Sampanthan - Senathiraj­ah duo’s harmony has cracked. The media campaign unleashed against Wigneswara­n in support of Senathiraj­ah has reached extremely low depths. Spearheadi­ng it are the newspapers controlled by TNA MP Saravanaba­van. Extremist sections in the Tamil Diaspora are attacking Wigneswara­n viciously. Also despite Senathiraj­ah’s perceived magnanimit­y it remains to be seen as to how Kautilyan intrigues will manifest themselves in the future. One wonders whether voting patterns would be engineered to make some other candidate or candidates gain more preference votes than Wigneswara­n.

A veritable Pandora’s box of the “Eelam” variety seems to have been opened and one does feel that the Sitar strumming Wigneswara­n may not be able to play the melody of his choice in the days to come. He may even find the strings on his instrument snapping if the current trend continues. All these developmen­ts and more will be scrutinise­d in greater detail in a forthcomin­g article. DBS Jeyaraj can be reached at

djeyaraj20­05@yahoo.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka