Building Sri Lanka’s resilience to climate change
Extreme weather events dominate the news but changing average weather patterns are proving equally devastating to poor and vulnerable people in climate hotspots across South Asia
About 19mn people in Sri Lanka today live in locations that would become moderate or severe hotspots by 2050
A new report provides the right data and climate simulations to help put in place incentives, policies and smart solutions to protect communities across the country
Thirty eight-year-old Sivasidambaram Vasugi is General Manager of one of the first cooperative-owned seed paddy processing centres in Killinochchi. The Integrated Farmers Thrift and Credit Cooperative Society provides local farmers with high-quality seeds but these days, there are no buyers walking in the door.
Her community is facing a crippling water shortage following many months of drought. Nearly 18,000kg of processed paddy seed stock sits unclaimed on Vasugi’s factory floor, while weeds sprout in the paddy fields all around.
“Only when the rains come again, they will buy the seeds,” she said.
“In the meantime, we have no sales and we are not making any profits.”
Farming households are coming undone thanks to this drought. Vasugi sees local men migrate to work as day labourers, while their families stay behind and fight to make ends meet. Many merely struggle to put food on the table.
Vasugi lives in a climate hotspot.
Areas like this are the focus of the World Bank’s new regional flagship report ‘South Asia’s Hotspots: The Impact of Temperature and Precipitation Changes on Living Standards’.
The report examines how 800 million people or half the population of South Asia could see their living standards worsen by 2050.
While floods and other extreme weather events can have an immediate and terrible impact, the rising temperatures and unpredictable precipitation – what we might consider ‘average weather’ – can prove as devastating.
“These weather events have one thing in common: They affect the lives of the poorest and most vulnerable the most,” said Andrew Goodland, World Bank programme leader for Sustainable Development covering Sri Lanka and the Maldives.
Speaking at the launch of South Asia’s Hotspots he added, “We need to both scale up actions and strategies to build a more resilient world and target interventions to help the most vulnerable.”
Climate change could undermine living standards for poorest
Changes in average weather unfold over months and years. As Vasugi can testify, in such hotspots, rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns can dampen agricultural productivity, leave farming households floundering and drive migration.
Simultaneously, a warmer climate can also increase the propagation of vector-borne and other infectious diseases. For those working outside air-conditioned cubicles, extreme heat takes a toll on productivity and subsequently, income. It doesn’t help that many hotspots are already in socially and economically vulnerable areas.
At the frontlines in Sri Lanka are those living in the island’s North, North Eastern and North Central districts, including Jaffna, Puttalam, Mannar, Kurunegalla, Trincomalee and Killinochchi, where the paddy seed processing centre is located.
Vasugi’s home has something in common with other hotspots across the region, such as Hyderabad in Pakistan, Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh and Chandrapur in India. Households in these areas tend to report low household consumption, poor road connectivity, limited access to markets and other development challenges. Combined, these conditions make them deeply vulnerable to climate change.
These experiences on the ground inevitably impact the national economy.
“In Sri Lanka, living standards could go down by around 5 percent and in the worst-case scenario may decline by around 7 percent,” said Muthukumara Mani, a lead economist in the World Bank South Asia Region and author of the report.
“Under the worst-case scenario, GDP will decline by 7.7 percent, an estimated loss of US $ 50 billion.”
Nineteen million Sri Lankans could live in moderate or severe hotspots by 2050
While policymakers are worried by this information, Mani knows it doesn’t necessarily help them prepare. So this report seeks to unpack where exactly changes will occur most, who will be impacted and what can be done to build resilience.
He and his team analysed two future climate scenarios — one that is “climate-sensitive”, in which some collective action is taken to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The other is “carbon-intensive”, in which no action is taken. Both scenarios show the rising temperatures throughout the region in the coming decades but it’s no surprise that the carbon-intensive scenario is more worrying.
While the policymakers are worried by this information, Mani knows it doesn’t necessarily help them prepare. So this report seeks to unpack where exactly the changes will occur most, who will be impacted and what can be done to build resilience.
He and his team analysed two future climate scenarios — one that is “climate-sensitive”, in which some collective action is taken to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The other is “carbon-intensive”, in which no action is taken. Both scenarios show the rising temperatures throughout the region in the coming decades but it’s no surprise that the carbon-intensive scenario is more worrying.
According to the report, approximately 19 million people in Sri Lanka today live in locations that could become moderate or severe hotspots by 2050 under the carbonintensive scenario. This is equivalent to more than 90 percent of the country’s population.
Granular details include how effects will differ from country to country and from district to district throughout South Asia. In Sri Lanka, the Northern and North Western Provinces emerge as the top two hotspots, followed by the much less densely populated North Central Province.
The highly urbanized and densely populated Western Province, which includes Colombo, is also predicted to experience a living standards decline of 7.5 percent by 2050, compared with a situation without changes in average weather. This is a substantial drop, with potentially large implications for the country, given that the province contributes more than 40 percent of Sri Lanka’s GDP.
Overall, the analysis concludes that Sri Lanka’s average annual temperatures could rise by 1.0°C to 1.5°C by 2050 - even if carbon emission reduction measures are taken as recommended by the Paris Agreement of 2015. If no measures are taken, average temperatures in Sri Lanka could increase by up to 2.0°C.
Mani points out that this might not seem like a lot until you consider how just a two-week delay in monsoons can derail a farmer’s harvest or how a scorching day can drain a construction worker labouring on a scaffolding.
Investing in sustainable development could build resilience
“We need to follow an inclusive green growth path here,” said Mohan Munasinghe, who was the keynote speaker at the launch.
He drew on his experiences as Vice Chair of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR4) and Chairman of the Presidential Expert Commission on Sustainable Sri Lanka 2030 Vision, saying, “We have to make development more sustainable in a way that is climate-proof and which integrates mitigation and adaptation.”
It is hoped that this information can help build a development blueprint by focusing resilience-building efforts on the most vulnerable locations and population groups.
“The report provides the right data and climate simulations to help us put in place incentives, policies and smart solutions to protect communities across the country and boost their future development,” said Anura Dissanayake, Secretary of the Mahaweli Development and Environment Authority.
In particular, the report explores how three strategies, already essential components of Sri Lanka’s sustainable development programmes, could help buffer vulnerable communities.
By increasing non-agricultural jobs by 30 percent relative to the current levels, Sri Lanka could reduce the living standards burden from −7.0 to 0.1 percent. Other initiatives like reducing the time to reach a market and increasing average education attainment could also reduce the overall severity of climaterelated living standards impacts. The report emphasizes that if these interventions were implemented together, they would likely yield greater benefits than if implemented individually.
In the end, the focus has to be on ensuring that climate change does not undo the considerable progress that the South Asian countries have made in alleviating extreme poverty and raising living standards.
The key takeaway may be that governments don’t have to choose between investing in development or climate-resilience – the two go hand in hand.
As Mani concluded, “Sustainable development is the best adaptation strategy since it is associated with improved infrastructure, market-oriented reforms, enhanced human capabilities and stronger institutional capacity to respond to the increasing threat of climate change and natural disasters.”