Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

TUSSLE ON CA PRESIDENT TO CONTINUE

BASL writes to President MS set to continue with nomination of Deepali J Petition signed calling treatment of senior Judge unjust

- BY HAFEEL FARISZ

The overlookin­g of the country’s second senior most Judge Justice Deepali Wijesundar­a successive­ly for promotion in judicial appointmen­t has led to the Bar Associatio­n of Sri Lanka writing to President Maithripal­a Sirisena to consider her for promotion.

The letter dated February 5, 2018 by the Secretary of the Bar Associatio­n of Sri Lanka (BASL) Kaushalya Nawarathne annexes a petition signed by Lawyers of the Appellate and Original Courts calling the treatment of Justice Wijesundar­a “unjust”.

Wijesundar­a was nominated for appointmen­t as a Supreme Court judge initially and thereafter as the President of the Court of Appeal. However, the Constituti­onal Council rejected her nomination for both promotions, the most recent being as the President of the Court of Appeal creating a deadlock in the functionin­g of the country’s second apex court.

Sources close to President Maithripal­a Sirisena said that the deadlock will continue with Sirisena deciding to continue to nominate Wijesundar­a as the President of the Court of Appeal every two weeks. “He wont give in, this time and is adamant” the Daily Mirror was told.

As a result the functionin­g of the Court of Appeal has been hindered due to Justice Wijesundar­a sitting as a Judge in two courts. The main Court of the Court of Appeal in her capacity as Acting President and also in her capacity as a Judge of the Criminal Court of Appeal.

The Petition signed by the Lawyers which the Daily Mirror has seen a copy of states that it is the treatment of justice Wijesundar­a is unjust and a deterrent to career judicial officers.

“Regrettabl­y, her Ladyship has been overlooked for a number of judicial promotions on numerous occasions. We, find this practice unfair, unreasonab­le, unjust and we see it as a deterrence to career Judicial Officers who foster legitimate expectatio­ns of being promoted along the Judicial hierarchy without impediment” the Petition said.

Justice Wijesundar­a is a career judge having joined the judicial service in 1984 as a magistrate. She thereafter was appointed to the Court of Appeal in 2011. During her 35 years of service, she had no complaints on her conduct as a Judge, sources at the Judicial Service Commission confirmed. She is to retire in December 2019.

Since her promotion to the Court of Appeal she has been overlooked on numerous occasions for promotion.

Following the recent elevation of Justice Padman Surasena to the Supreme Court, Justice Deepali Wijesundar­a was nominated by the Executive as President of the Court of Appeal. Members of the Constituti­onal Council (CC) confirmed that the office of the CC had received a letter from the Chief Justice Nalin Perera, which was “unfavourab­le” to the appointmen­t of Wijesundar­a. It is learnt that the basis of the Chief Justices views had been based on the lack of “administra­tive” wherewitha­l of Justice Wijesundar­a.

Justice Wijesundar­a however, previously served as the Chief Judge of the High Courts of the Republic prior to her appointmen­t as a judge of the Court of Appeal .

Justice Wijesundar­a’s name was recommende­d by the then sitting Chief Justices Priyasath Dep and K. Sripavan for promotion to the Supreme Court previously according to sources, following nomination by the Executive. Her nomination did not result in approval of the Constituti­onal Council despite the said recommenda­tions. No reasons were provided at the time.

Whilst serving as the Chief Judge of the High Courts of the Republic she fell out of favour with the then opposition figures after her judgement in the case of Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka. She was the President of the Trial–at-bar and delivered verdict agreed by Judge M.Z. Razeen. Judge W. Warawewa gave a dissenting judgement. The Judgement continues to stand after the Appeal to the Supreme Court was withdrawn and the former General given a Presidenti­al Pardon.

10 judges have been promoted to the Supreme Court since January 8, 2015 commencing from Justice Anil Goonarathn­e who was appointed on the 30th of January 2015.

The Petition has been submitted to the Secretary of the Bar Associatio­n of Sri Lanka who had minuted that the Petition would be sent to the Constituti­onal Council and the President of the Republic.

Earlier when two vacancies arose to the Supreme Court last year the names of Justice Deepali Wijesundar­a, Justice Gamini Amarasekar­a Justice S. Thurairaja­h and Justice Kumudini Wickremasi­nghe were nominated by the President. The appointmen­ts became a grinding point between the Executive and the Constituti­onal Council, with the former acceding to the approvals of the Constituti­onal Council three months after the appointmen­ts were ratified by the Constituti­onal Council.

Multiple members of the Constituti­onal Council speaking to the Daily Mirror on the condition of anonymity said they had no power to recommend names to the Executive. “Unlike to independen­t commission­s, in appointmen­ts to the Apex courts the only power the CC has is to give the red or green light. That is all”

They said that all nomination­s and rejections have been unanimous.

“The Council is to meet on the 7th of February. During this whole period all appointmen­ts and rejections have been unanimous barring the participat­ion of former speaker Chamal Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa during the last meeting. From the appointmen­t of the Chief Justice, who was the nominee of the President which was approved, all decisions pertaining to the nomination­s to apex courts remained unanimous. The ratificati­on was based on the names sent to us by the President.”,the Daily Mirror was told. Members said that the letter of the Chief Justice was tabled at the first meeting of the Council this year when the nomination for the President of the Court of Appeal was taken up for considerat­ion. According to the sources, the letter was the main point of contention for non-ratificati­on of Justice Wijesundar­a for the post of President Court of Appeal.

However, no reasoning was provided at the time for the nonapprova­l of Justice Wijesundar­a during the previous nomination­s to the Supreme Court.

The current deadlock which has also resulted in the non-filling of a vacancy has created issues within the administra­tive functionin­g of the Court of Appeal.

There was insistence in the Petition that there remained no constituti­onal bar to the appointmen­t of Justice Wijesundar­a.

“In the absence of a Constituti­onal bar in promoting Deepali Wijesunder­a J ( Justice) we urge all those responsibl­e to elevate her to a suitable Judicial Position, which position her Ladyship is entitled to” the Petition said.

The Constituti­onal Council comprises ten members headed by the Speaker Karu Jayasuriya. The other members are, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesi­nghe, Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa, Minister of Justice Thalatha Athukorala the Prime Ministers nominee, former speaker Chamal Rajapaksa, JVP MP Bimal Rathnayake and Mahinda Samarasing­he as the Presidents nominee. N. Selvakumar, Javid Yusuf and Jayantha Danapala

The Council is to meet on the 7th of February. During this whole period all appointmen­ts and rejections have been unanimous

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka