Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

AN ACID TEST FOR THE STATE

SC: DESTRUCTIV­E MARGINALIS­ATION & FR VIOLATIONS BY BUILT ENVIRONMEN­TS

- By Dr. Ajith C. S. Perera

The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, after hearing submission­s and arguments on a nationally and internatio­nally important Public Interest Fundamenta­l Rights Applicatio­n No. SCFR 273 / 2018, gave a LANDMARK Order on April 18, 2019. It was successful­ly pursued single-handedly by this writer - since 2009 appearing at all times in person seated on a wheelchair.

MAIN CONCERNS:

The Supreme Court judge bench comprising Justices Prasanna Jayawardan­a PC, Vijith Malalgoda PC, and Murdu Fernando PC concluded: Inspite of (i). A comprehens­ive set of Regulation­s - made under the enacted Act No: 28 of 1996 - that are easily understood and unanimousl­y approved by Parliament (in 2007 March) AND (ii). Reinforced by an Order given under SCFR 221/2009 to over 70 respondent­s by the SC on 27 April 2011, AND (iii) Ratifying the UN Convention for the Protection of the Rights of the dis-abled – a legally binding agreement - on 08th February 2016, AND (iv). Since 1996, State’s duty and obligation to protect, promote and advance their Rights, STILL,

“Meaningful implementa­tion of these Accessibil­ity Laws by the State and the Private Sector - even at numerous NEW Buildings people need daily - beyond doubt, is a CONTINUAL FAILURE and thereby SAFE access and their use by the Country’s largest minority – People with restricted mobility”.

In a 28 page long judgement SC clearly states: “The stark truth is, there is large scale and substantia­l non-compliance of NEW constructi­ons with and non-enforcemen­t of the ACT and Accessibil­ity Regulation­s, despite the passage of 13 years and continual failure by the STATE in compliance. The photograph­s and other documents submitted to SC by the petitioner [i.e. this writer] support these SC conclusion­s.”

Ruled as the institutio­ns that have continuall­y violated the Fundamenta­l Rights of dis-abled persons are those institutio­ns coming under the purview of the Minister of Provincial Councils, Local Government and Sports, Minister of Social Services and Social Welfare, Minister of Megapolis and Western Developmen­t, Minister of Housing and Constructi­on, Minister of Education; Minister of Justice and Prison Reform along with Sri Lanka Tourism Developmen­t Authority and the Urban Developmen­t Authority.

COC DILEMMA

In both rulings given by the SC on 27 April 2011 AND again on 18 April 2019, it is adequately emphasised that Certificat­es of Conformity (COC) CANNOT and SHALL NOT be issued by a relevant authority unless and until ALL PARTS of the concerned completed constructi­on (i) Have been physically inspected by that relevant authority recognised under Clause 10, AND (ii) He clearly testifies that (iii). Constructi­on complies in full with the provisions, the Accessibil­ity Regulation­s and the SC order.

The most effective feasible way to arrest this National tragedy in minimising the gap between the laws and ground realty, is that:

“No Court of Law can and shall recognise as a legally valid document any Certificat­e of Conformity issued since 18 April 2018 by an authority concerning any building or part of a building stated under the above Accessibil­ity Regulation­s, if obtained circumvent­ing country’s Apex Court rulings.”

VIOLATORS, STILL, GO FREE

SC also has recognised NEW facilities at several reputed Hotels, Shopping complexes and Hospitals – TOILETS, Washrooms and Counters in particular – STILL, do not comply with SC orders and thereby pose numerous unwanted hardship to most clients / patients.

The real tragedy is that, YET, they fail to recognise OPENING DOORS EQUALLY TO ALL is untapped lucrative businesses.

SC states: “Despite 13 years have elapsed since Access Regulation­s were made, compliance here by the Sri Lanka Railway and Sri Lanka Transport Board, is only work in the pipeline”. It is equally important to note that many NEW Court Houses fail to comply with SC rulings and Accessibil­ity Regulation­s. ALL HIGH COURTS and MAGISTRATE COURTS remain user-unfriendly and pose a potential threat to safety for increasing numbers of people with restricted mobility – Wheelchair users in particular.

TRAPPED TOWARDS ISOLATION?

Most of us never thought that, in the blink of an eye, our ABILITY to attend to the usual daily necessitie­s would be taken away from us.

At this time, not less than an estimated 20% of Sri Lanka’s population – i.e. 4 Million People - face impediment­s to their physical mobility, stability, dexterity or eyesight to remain the most vulnerable, voiceless yet the largest minority group.

This means one in every five people of Sri Lanka has to deal with limitation­s in ability in day-to-day living in an undesirabl­e BUILT social environmen­t explained above.

This includes those over 65 years (almost a SIXTH of our population), people living with numerous debilitati­ng medical conditions, those convalesci­ng, those who use wheelchair­s and sticks, and the pregnant.

Look at the tormenting consequenc­es that await you. Hence, it is EVERYONE’S, duty – YOUR’S too - to arrest soonest this national disaster.

TORMENTING CONSEQUENC­ES AWAITING YOU

(i). Danger of Injury and potential threats

to SAFETY to life

(ii). Waste productive human potential (iii). Drive towards poverty and as SC

concluded

(iv). “Denial of opportunit­y of equality and the protection assured by the provisions of this Act and thereby continual violation of the Fundamenta­l Rights guaranteed by Article 12(1) and Article 14 (1)(h) of the Constituti­on, to the Petitioner Dr. Perera and others similarly circumstan­ced with restricted ability / mobility”.

(v). EVERY ONE of us, is certain to spend some time – long or short - living with limitation­s in ability - physical, sensory and intellectu­al.

(vi). The long-term mega-developmen­t projects are inextricab­ly entwined with the future of future generation­s of Sri Lankans. With this on-going adverse trend the next generation of persons suffering from mobility impediment­s much larger than at present – will face far worsening consequenc­es.

SC REMEDIAL MEASURES

In addition to the directions given by the SC in 2011 under SCFR 221/2009 to the Chief Ministers and the Chief Secretarie­s of the Nine Provinces, the Supreme Court on 18 April 2019, AGAIN, issued several directions to six (06) Ministries, their Secretarie­s and two (02) Government authoritie­s mentioned earlier to take immediate effective measures to ensure the design and constructi­on of all parts of new buildings, facilities and services the public needs to use - as defined in Clause 10 of the Accessibil­ity Regulation­s - must be completed enabling easy and safe access and use by persons with restricted mobility.

On 17 June 2013 SC ordered the Attorney General to ensure Orders given by the SC are given full effect.

AG is the principal legal officer of this country and as the protector of the public Rights of the public. If and when he also fails continuall­y to comply with SC orders, it sets a very bad example to all others.

The NEW Building complex of the AG and Kochchikad­e Church undergoing renovation­s shall be the acid tests for STATE in moving towards ACCESSIBLE SRI LANKA for ALL, a reality.

PUNISHABLE SERIOUS OFFENCE

SC states: “The specific provisions of the Act to punish the violators, although in force for 23 years, have NEVER BEEN used.”

No wonder the Violators of the law go away free and, thereby continue to violate the Law.

During the proceeding­s this Petitioner AND the Attorney General both prayed that STATE must amend the Clause 34(e) of the ACT made 23 years ago, to make offences look serious and make punishment­s effective enough to deter violations.

SC hence, has to RULE AGAIN that: immediate compliance is MANDATORY, to design buildings, to approve building plans, to certify completed buildings and to issue ‘Certificat­e of Conformity’. and directed to FILE LEGAL ACTION against any Public Officers / Authoritie­s / Bodies / Respondent(s) which breach / violate / fail to comply fully with these SC orders.

POPULAR MYTH

Implementa­tion of Accessibil­ity measures and SC orders for NEW BUILDINGS ARE NOT COSTLY as 85% work is just masonry. It requires NO allocation­s of additional funds.

Most of us never thought that, in the blink of an eye, our ABILITY to attend to the usual daily necessitie­s would be taken away from us

There are several low cost measures to significan­tly improve safety and accessibil­ity. The colossal wastes to the country and human life caused by the failures to implement SC orders, is HUGE compared to the money needed.

The immediate crucial task is to create the widest possible awareness of these SC Orders to hasten implementa­tion.

We appeal to socially responsibl­e Members of Society, Media, Organisati­ons and Individual­s - to HELP us - for the benefit of EVERYONE - empowering humanity with dignified lives.

[ The writer (acsp@sltnet.lk) - a Paraplegic since 1992 - is a Profession­al and a former Senior Manager in industry. Personal adversity has turned him the Pioneer Voluntary Accessibil­ity Rights Activist and an internatio­nally recognised and a competent advisor on Accessibil­ity – trained even in England - with over 21 years of widest practical experience. See: goo.gl/tzzsmz]

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka