Champika writes to Japanese PM over LRT

● Japan remained SL’S largest development partner for a long time

Former Minister of Megapolis and Western Development and JHU General Secretary Patali Champika Ranawaka has written to Prime Minister of Japan Yoshihide Suga apologising for “any inconvenience caused to Japan” due to the decision taken by the present Sri Lankan Government to discontinue the Japan-funded Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project of Sri Lanka.

“I wish to extend this sincere apology to the government and people of Japan on behalf of the people of Sri Lanka for any inconvenience caused by the decision taken by the present government of Sri Lanka to discontinue this collaborative project,” Minister Ranawaka during whose tenure the joint project was formalised, has written. “The Jica-funded study carried out during 2008-2012, a combination of interventions was identified including Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Bus Modernisation, Railway Electrification, Double Line Railway and a Monorail system. Subsequently, during 2015-16, in a second detailed study carried out jointly by Japanese and Sri Lankan experts under the ‘Comtrans’ urban transport master plan, the LRT solution was identified as the highest impact strategic intervention, which could be complemented by BRT and Bus Modernisation etc. Seven LRT corridors were identified, finally narrowing down to four, with the most congested Kaduwela-fort corridor as the highest priority,” the ex-minister has reminded.

“JICA granted the funding for the project at a highly concessionary interest rate of 0.1 % per annum (and the consultancy component at 0.01%) with a 14-year grace period and a 40-year payback period. He has written that the current government of Sri Lanka has decided to “abruptly discontinue for reasons perhaps best known to them”.

Recalling the solid Japan- Sri Lanka ties sustained for the past 70 years, the ex-minister declares that “Japan remained Sri Lanka’s largest development partner for a long time, stood by Sri Lanka’s interests at important international fora, and is not known to have traded its development assistance with unhealthy and unfriendly economic or political pressures”.