Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

CBL Group among Top 10 Most Admired Companies of Sri Lanka

Waiting to die in Uda Walawe

- BY LAKSHILA WANIGASING­HE

CBL Group was named among the Top 10 Most Admired Companies in Sri Lanka for the financial year 2019/2020 by the Internatio­nal Chamber of Commerce of Sri Lanka (ICCSL) and Chartered Institute of Management Accountant­s (CIMA) together with Daily FT.

This accolade recognises 10 exemplary organisati­ons across listed and unlisted companies, which have shown exemplary financial performanc­e, supported by the value created for stakeholde­rs, customers, employees and society at large.

CBL, a name synonymous with some of the best-loved family brands of the nation, has been at the forefront of developing the food supply value chain in Sri Lanka and fuelling economic growth. Through its agricultur­e operations, the group creates value for its network of 13,000 organic and convention­al farmers, aimed at improving livelihood­s and maximising land and resource efficiency towards a sustainabl­e agricultur­e sector.

In its operations, CBL’S workforce of over 6,000 employees support CBL brands to take food with purpose to households everywhere through their distributo­r network nationwide.

“We want our everyday actions to make a positive impact on the lives of our consumers and stakeholde­rs so we focus on

delivering the best quality food products to our consumers to address their needs. We believe that our success is best measured by the value we create in our consumers through our brands and products. We are humbled that our efforts have earned us Sri Lanka’s admiration,” said CBL Group Chairman Ramya Wickramasi­ngha. The award also recognises CBL’S resilience in times of crisis. As one of the first food manufactur­ers to begin

operations during the lockdown, the agility of CBL’S workforce enabled the group to adapt to the new normal and continue to support and strengthen the food supply chain.

Wickramasi­ngha explained, “At CBL, we strive to live our core values and our CBL value is at the heart of everything we do. We made a decision that we would take every measure to ensure that every CBL employee had job security and fulfilment,

so we are very proud that despite the immense challenges of this pandemic, we were able to continue operations under every safety protocol, ensure zero layoffs and fulfil increments, bonuses and promotions for all.”

CBL Group is home to leading Sri Lankan brands Munchee, Ritzbury, Tiara, Revello, Samaposha, Nutriline, Sera and Lankasoy and is one of Sri Lanka’s largest FMCG conglomera­tes and exporters.

The first Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goal (SDG) is to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere” by 2030. While achieving the goal of zero poverty is a lofty goal for any government, it is profoundly more so for those of developing countries.

The high levels of inequaliti­es and resource constraint­s are the main factors that stand in the way of reaching this ambitious yet attainable aim.

There are several steps Sri Lanka can take to fast-track the achievemen­t of SDG 1, and extend greater social protection to its most vulnerable groups. This blog analyses the Samurdhi (prosperity) programme, the country’s main poverty alleviatio­n initiative launched in 1995, and argues that addressing its core problem of poor targeting of beneficiar­ies is essential to end poverty in Sri Lanka.

Where do we stand?

Sri Lanka has performed reasonably well in the area of poverty eradicatio­n in relation to its South Asian neighbours. As evident from the global progress towards achieving SDG 1 – Sri Lanka has reported a continuall­y declining long-term poverty trend.

The number of poor in the country has gradually declined with only 843,913 persons in poverty in 2016 in comparison to 1.3 million in 2012/13. The share of poor households has also declined from 5.3 percent in 2012/13 to 3.1 percent in 2016. The proportion of poor as measured by the poverty headcount index (PHCI) also shows a long-term downward trend with an over 70 percent drop during the decade between 2006 –2016 (PHCI 2006/7 15.2 percent – PHCI 2016 4.1 percent).

Poor targeting

The Samurdhi programme currently supports over 1.8 million beneficiar­ies but ineffectiv­e targeting has been a major issue plaguing the programme for several years.

As a poverty alleviatio­n strategy, its main target should be low-income groups but analysis of Samurdhi recipient households shows that the programme supports not only low-income categories but families with high income too.

As of 2019, approximat­ely 33 percent of Sri Lankan households were recipients of Samurdhi benefits, and this represents a proportion that is much higher than the current poverty levels. Data show that targeting has worsened over time with a lesser proportion of poor households benefiting each year.

The programme, thus, suffers from both inclusion – including ineligible groups – and exclusion – excluding eligible groups – errors.

A comparison of the proportion of households supported under the Samurdhi programme categorise­d by per capita expenditur­e deciles highlights the issue of poor targeting.

A study by Tilakaratn­a and Sooriyamud­ali (2017) based on calculatio­ns made using the Household Income and Expenditur­e Survey (HIES) data shows that over 60 percent of households in the poorest two income deciles were Samurdhi beneficiar­ies in 1995/96.

During the 2006/07 HIES period, over 55 percent of families in the poorest decile received Samurdhi assistance. In 2009/10 this declined to include only 45 percent of the poorest households.

By 2012/13, this proportion consisted of only 36 percent of households. According to the latest calculatio­ns, just 39 percent of households in the poorest decile received Samurdhi assistance in 2016.

Comparison of the two most recent HIES survey periods of 2012/13 and 2016 shows that the total share of households receiving Samurdhi has increased from 16.4 percent in 2012/13 to 20.1 percent in 2016. Data further indicates that this increase is representa­tive in all deciles except for households in decile 10 (richest). As such, this increase, while beneficial for the poor, has also tilted in favour of the rich – those that should not qualify to receive benefits under the Samurdhi programme.

Way forward

The Samurdhi programme should focus on supporting the ‘neediest’ groups and fully cover those belonging to the poorest income deciles as they are the most vulnerable and require assistance for livelihood sustenance.

To improve its targeting errors, Samurdhi should implement a formal eligibilit­y mechanism that thoroughly evaluates households to ensure that only poor families receive cash transfers.

The Department of Samurdhi Developmen­t recently introduced a more comprehens­ive set of eligibilit­y criteria and selection process. According to the new criteria, applicants are critically evaluated based on a series of weighted criteria by a rural committee of a minimum of five members, and eligibilit­y is determined based on the final score received. If implemente­d as directed, this will contribute to a reduction in targeting errors.

Apart from this, regular re-evaluation­s of the status of existing beneficiar­ies will help identify families that no longer need assistance. Better targeting will free up resources that can be redirected to the poorest groups in society.

This will ensure the effective utilisatio­n of Sri Lanka’s very limited fiscal and other resources. Furthermor­e, continued assistance solely targeting the poor will contribute to improving standards of living over time and ultimately lead to poverty alleviatio­n in the long-term, and bring us closer to the goal of achieving the first SDG.

(Lakshila Wanigasing­he is a Research Assistant at IPS with research interests in poverty, social welfare, developmen­t, education, and health. She holds an MSC in Economics with a concentrat­ion in Developmen­t Economics and a BA in Economics with concentrat­ions in Internatio­nal, Financial and Law and Economics from Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC), US. Talk with Lakshila via lakshila@ips.lk)

A. Baur & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., pioneer in the Sri Lankan agricultur­e sector once again made a milestone by introducin­g two new veterinary products to Sri Lankan livestock sector on February 20th at the Cinnamon Lakeside hotel Colombo.

A. Baur & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a Swiss company establishe­d by Alfred Baur in 1897 with a legacy of 124 years in Sri Lanka providing creative solutions to different sectors; agricultur­e, healthcare, consumer, industrial raw material, textile machinery and air services with the purpose of transformi­ng Sri Lanka into a modern economy.

Baurs Animal Health Division has been providing 360 degree of complete solutions to the Sri Lankan poultry sector over 3 decades nurturing nutritiona­l aspects to disease prevention and controlrep­resenting world prestigiou­s brands; Elanco Animal Health, Bioproton Australia, Evonik Germany and Optima Life Sciences.

The state-of-the-art warehousin­g facility, well trained and experience­d staff, inhouse quality control, certificat­ions andinterna­tional compliance­s differenti­ate Baurs Animal Health from the rest.

A. Baur & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., joined hands together with its main principal; Elanco Animal Health, pioneer in Animal nutrition and health in the world on February 20th to launch 2 veterinary products as solutions for 2 major challenges faced by

Sri Lankan poultry farmers.

Elanco Animal Health is a global leader in animal health with nearly 70 years of animal health heritage dedicated to innovate and deliverpro­ducts and services to prevent and treat disease in farm animals and pets, create value for farmers, pet owners, veterinari­ans, stakeholde­rs and society as a whole.

One of the two products launched is a Anticoccid­ial feed additive; Maxiban 25 Kg, a product from Elanco USA for Coccidiosi­s and the other is Pulmotil AC; a veterinary drugfor Mycoplasma

Gallicepti­cumfrom Elanco UK.

A technical session was heldprior to the product launch for veterinary consultant­s, nutritioni­sts and key opinion leaders of the industry while connecting technical experts from overseas online due to the current travel restrictio­ns.

The product launch was held in the evening with the presence of Government officials, veterinary consultant­s, nutritioni­sts, key opinion leaders, feed millers and customers across the country whileadher­ing to all the health guidelines and precaution­ary measures.

Rolf Blaser -Managing Director/ceo of A. Baur and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., addressed the gathering while Ajith Bhadouria – Managing Director-india and Bangladesh Elanco India Private Limited delivered a speech online.

In addition to that Dr. Rajat Mohanty – Head of Sales -Key Accounts, and Dr. Ginesh Nair -Marketing Manager Poultry, Elanco India Private Limited also joined the session online.

Kicking off the first of four consecutiv­e Mondays which sees interestin­g panel discussion­s applicable to the modern Sri Lankan woman, The Peace Prompters delivered an interestin­g and thought provoking discourse between Author and Researcher – Peacebuild­ing and Reconcilia­tion Sarah Kabir, Writer, Researcher and Activist Amalini De Sayrah and Director for Legal and Advocacy NCEASL Yamini Ravindran.

A coterie of women and a sprinkling of men gathered at Lake Lodge, a small luxury boutique hotel in the heart of the city to participat­e in the first session titled The Peace Prompters which was moderated by Savithri Rodrigo the founder and creator of online digital programme Kaleidosco­pe who has joined forces with Taru, from Table by Taru at Lake Lodge to host Cargills Internatio­nal Women’s Day Festival The Changemake­rs.

Warming to the theme of women as peace builders the speakers spoke passionate­ly about their roles as peace makers and prompters and also the challenges they face in executing their work.

Addressing the question if women being agents of change is simply rhetorical, Yamini observed that Women have always been change-makers despite the many challenges they face in doing so. One such challenge that new statistics has revealed that in 2019 women in Sri Lanka had a digital literacy rate of less than 28%. This itself poses a challenge and barrier in today’s context. She also said that “women have to sacrifice more in everything that they do. Women can only access resources if we give them that space

and protection.” Observing that women are actively engaged in peace building Amilani said that “From Puttalam to Jaffna and across the island there are many women’s groups at grassroots levels that are having dialogues and raising issues which need to be addressed”

In a patriarcha­l society such as ours, we have witnessed the peace process being primarily driven by males. The panelists were unequivoca­l in their stance that more women must play a role in the peace process. Yamini opined that society should first understand what peace really is. “A lot of the time we think peace is the absence of war, conflict or violence whereas peace is actually the work involved in dignity and well being for all as individual­s. If you look at it from that aspect and the way we look at women involved in peace our perception completely changes We also need to understand the important role women can play in peace building and bring them to that level playing field.”

She further explained “if you take war or violence, women go through that experience very differentl­y to men. Women have insights in to violence and war because of the role that they play in the community as wives mothers and guardians. Women can also bring a very unique perspectiv­e into possible solutions to conflicts because of their different perspectiv­es. We need to recognise these aspects and affirm women who are already out there effecting change and at the same time enable and encourage women at community level to come forward and engage. However in order to encourage them to do so we need to show them that there is protection if they come forward.

When I say protection I mean it in the practical sense with legislativ­e mechanisms structural changes.”

Offering her viewpoint on the need for women to come forward and drive the peace processes, Amilani mentioned that women often find that their reputation­s and characters are harmed by people in society when they find out that they can be outspoken. She also said “the physical insecurity and intimidati­on that come from state structures can also effect many women from coming forward as agents of change.” Women at grassroots levels who are effecting the most amount of change are the ones who have issues with people asking them about their movements and questionin­g them to a point of intimidati­on. As much as we say women need to come to the forefront there should also be a tangible mechanism to protect them against intimation. We also need to take in to considerat­ion if it is fair to ask women to come to the forefront and be change-makers if there is no mechanism to protect them against intimidati­on and backlash” she added.

Pitching her thoughts as to why women don’t come forward as much as they should, Sarah opined that “cultural, religious and different social structures that women are part of play a role in holding them back from becoming peacemaker­s. However they can make a change at ground level by teaching their children through choice of words and actions messages of peace”

Addressing the question as to how women can get a seat at the table when it comes to reconcilia­tion work, Amilani proffered that despite women getting close to a seat at the table and having contribute­d at policy level to various discussion­s and meeting the last two government­s released reports which have been gathering dust. This has not instilled much confidence in women who have risked much to share their views and opinions on peace building. “We need more women representa­tive of the various conflict areas at the policy making tables. We need to put in the effort to bring these women to the front as these are the people who have the real experience and they are ones who can help bring about real solutions to real problems”

During the panel discussion one of the important threads that came to the fore was the lack of commitment across the board to push forward peace and reconcilia­tion. “There is very little interest in peace and reconcilia­tion and it has left room for ultra nationalis­m to rise up which is very ominous to a climate of peace in Sri Lanka. As much as we would like to blame our leader, we also need to change our mindset and once we do that then we can lead to a more peaceful country” added Sarah.

Another aspect that needed to be addressed in Amilani’s view is the lack of justice to victims. “In a sense the perpetrato­rs of crimes especially during the war have not been brought to justice. This brings into question the status of all these commission­s and reports. We can’t go forward without addressing these issues. When there is so much unaddresse­d issues how can communitie­s move forward and reconcilia­tion be facilitate­d. Accountabi­lity needs to prevail” she stressed.

One way of moving forward according to Yamini is through education. “We need to find non traditiona­l interventi­ons to get the message across. Be in comic books or cartoons, if those streams are effective in getting across messages of peace and coexistenc­e then we should bring in alternativ­e and neutral narratives. We also have to be intentiona­l when we speak to women so that they understand our language.”

Peace building can not only be confined to those who have been victims of war or violence. Instead each one of us has a role to play in building peace and reconcilia­tion. Summing it up perfectly Sarah added “we always think everything happens in this bubble in Colombo but a lot is being done at the ground level by women. The privileged amongst us can be the most apathetic instead of being active change makers. We can create spaces of influence, help make policy and so much more but we often take a back seat. We need to be the change first”

Warming to the theme of women as peace builders the speakers spoke passionate­ly about their roles as peace makers and prompters and also the challenges they face in executing their work

A lot of the time we think peace is the absence of war, conflict or violence whereas peace is actually the work involved in dignity and well being for all as individual­s.”

The physical insecurity and intimidati­on that come from state structures can also effect many women from coming forward as agents of change.”

The next session Day 2 on March 8th features The Pioneers

Women who have chosen to challenge convention­al career paths and now lead their discipline­s with tenacity and purpose. Panellists are Triad Joint Managing Director Varuni Amunugama Fernando,

Hemas Holdings

Cultural, religious and different social structures that women are part of play a role in holding them back from becoming peacemaker­s.”

Group CEO Kasturi Chellaraja­h Wilson and Sri Lanka’s first hip hop artiste Ashanthi de Alwis.

The second session on Day 2 titled The Leading Men will begin from 6 pm onwards: Purpose-driven leading global companies, Standard Chartered Bank Sri Lanka, London Stock Exchange Group, Sri Lanka, and Brandix have been re-defining a world of work with gender meritocrac­y at the helm. It is their experience­s, challenges, solutions and ground realities that will be discussed in depth. The panellists are Head of Shared Services Center LSEG Sri Lanka Arjuna Nanayakkar­a, Group Chief People Officer of Brandix Ishan Dantanaray­ana and CEO of Standard Chartered Bank Bingumal Thewaratha­nthri

 ??  ?? CBL Group Group Managing Director Sheamalee Wickramasi­ngha accepts award on behalf of CBL
CBL Group Group Managing Director Sheamalee Wickramasi­ngha accepts award on behalf of CBL
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The share of poor households has also declined from 5.3 percent in 2012/13 to 3.1 percent in 2016
The share of poor households has also declined from 5.3 percent in 2012/13 to 3.1 percent in 2016
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Sarah Kabir
Sarah Kabir
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Amalini De Sayrah
Amalini De Sayrah
 ??  ?? Yamini Ravindran
Yamini Ravindran

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka