Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Roadblocks to foreign direct investment

- By Nimal Sanderatne

The hopes and expectatio­ns of sustaining the current rate of economic growth and raising it to a still higher trajectory of growth would depend on whether the country would be able to attract adequate foreign and domestic investment. A small country can only develop with significan­t amounts of foreign direct investment of the right types. Therefore an investment climate that is attractive for foreign investors is vital strategy for the country's economic developmen­t.

Inducing foreign investment is important for several reasons. Foreign direct investment brings with it export markets, advanced technology and management skills. In due course there would be a transfer of technology that would increase the economic efficiency and capability of the country. Despite this paramount need, the country has taken some backward steps towards making the business climate less attractive to both local and foreign investors. Recent assessment­s of the country as a risky destinatio­n for investment would deter foreign investors. This is a serious setback to the country's long term economic developmen­t.

Importance of investment

Investment by and large determines economic growth. This is one of the few propositio­ns in economics that are not contested. This is so whatever economic system prevails. It is as applicable to a socialist economy as to a capitalist one. The difference in these two systems of political economy is that while in a socialist economy investment is undertaken by the state that owns and controls the commanding heights of the economy, in a capitalist economy investment decisions are taken mostly by private investors. Neverthele­ss in both systems it is largely the rate of investment that determines the rate of economic growth.

However, the rate of return of the investment in each economy is determined by a host of conditions which are summed up in terms such as the efficiency of capital, productivi­ty of investment, capital: output ratio or the incrementa­l capital output ratio (ICOR). The efficiency of capital is dependent on the state of infrastruc­ture, human capital, work ethics, organisati­onal efficiency, the legal framework and investment climate, among others. Therefore, while a host of factors determine the productivi­ty of investment these conditions are fixed at any given time and, therefore, it is the rate of investment that determines economic growth.

Neverthele­ss the improvemen­t of these other conditions would result in an improvemen­t in the efficiency of capital. It is for these reasons that developed countries have a higher efficiency of capital. In the longer run, the conditions that influence the efficiency of capital must be improved and over time higher economic growth can be achieved by both higher investment and improvemen­ts in the efficiency of capital.

The implicatio­ns of this discussion for economic growth are that the

IMPERATIVE­S FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN­T

country must increase the rate of investment if it is to move to a higher trajectory of growth and that to achieve a higher rate of investment there are a host of conditions that must be fulfilled to attract investment that is summed up by the term investment climate.

Investment climate

Several recent assessment­s of the country as a destinatio­n for foreign investment have been unfavourab­le. Initially the Fitch rating downgraded the country and said it was a risky place to do business. The latest Index of Economic Freedom compiled by the USbased Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal said that although significan­t gains have been made, weak rule of law and heavy state-presence in economic activity continue to dampen private-sector-led developmen­t. This assessment is no different to that of the local business community and many independen­t economists.

The latest Us-based Index of Economic Freedom is not without a good word for the improvemen­ts in the country. Its report stated, "Sri Lanka's economic freedom score is 58.3, making its economy the 97th freest in the 2012 Index. Its score is 1.2 points higher than last year, reflecting solid gains in trade freedom, monetary freedom, and business freedom. Sri Lanka is ranked 16th out of 41 countries in the Asia-pacific region, and its score remains below the world average,"

It notes several positive developmen­ts when it says that notable changes have been implemente­d in key areas. It recognises that regulatory efficiency has been considerab­ly enhanced through establishm­ent of a streamline­d business formation process and simplifica­tion of licensing requiremen­ts. Further, it notes that non-tariff barriers are relatively low, statutory tariff rates have been reduced, and many import surcharges have been eliminated.

Yet despite these improvemen­ts overall business confidence has weakened. The New York Times-washington Post report said that despite some gains in economic freedoms the setbacks were greater. It said: "Neverthele­ss, challenges to economic freedom in Sri Lanka are considerab­le, particular­ly in strengthen­ing the fundamenta­ls. Property rights are undermined by an inefficien­t judicial system that remains susceptibl­e to substantia­l corruption and political influence. The heavy state presence in the economy continues to hamper private-sector developmen­t."

Discouragi­ng factors

Three aspects of government economic policy have been responsibl­e for the deteriorat­ing business confidence on Sri Lanka. The attempt to state control the economy is foremost among them. The takeover of previously privatized economic entities, the state ownership of business enterprise­s, mainly banks, by government agencies buying into them and taking control of governing boards and the legislatio­n to take over so-called underutili­zed and underperfo­rming enterprise­s have led to fears of state interferen­ce in the economy

hese three actions of the government have resulted in fears of government taking over private businesses and questioned whether the private sector has much of a role in the country's developmen­t. The role of the government in the economy is growing and the business community intimidate­d. The role of the private sector is being eroded by these measures.

The blow to business confidence owing to these state actions is severe and the matter needs to be redressed by the government. Assurances alone are unlikely to correct the situation. Some significan­t concrete policy changes are needed to restore business confidence.

Rule of law

Although the biggest obstacle to foreign investment was removed two and a half years ago, the relatively peaceful conditions have not been accompanie­d by the rule of law and law and order in the country. This is another severe deterrent to foreign investment in particular.

The Index of Economic Freedom compiled by the Us-based Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal said: "The judicial system is weak and vulnerable to political interferen­ce. The commercial court system is subject to extensive delays that often lead investors to pursue out-of-court settlement­s. A fairly reliable registrati­on system exists for recording private property, including land and buildings, but fraud and forged documents are problems. Mistrust of government is considerab­le due to widespread public-sector corruption."

The rule of law and the establishm­ent of law and order are fundamenta­l prerequisi­tes for economic developmen­t. The national and internatio­nal perception is that there is deteriorat­ion in implementa­tion of the rule of law. Lawlessnes­s is a common occurrence and threats to life and property are threats to economic freedom and serious deterrents to investment.

Conclusion

Sustaining the current rate of economic growth and raising it to a still higher trajectory of growth would depend on attracting significan­t amounts of foreign direct investment of the right types. Therefore, an investment climate that is attractive for foreign investors is vital strategy for the country's economic developmen­t. Some of the current economic policies and the law and order situation are serious disincenti­ves to foreign direct investment of the right type and adequate amounts.

Foreign investment in the hospitalit­y trade has been significan­t. This would boost not only the current balance of payments through the capital inflows for purchase of property, but also increase tourist earnings in due course. Yet, what the country really needs are investment­s in industry that would bring in advanced technology that would result in the transfer of technology to the country. Without such enhanced foreign investment it is not possible to achieve a high trajectory of growth.

Recent internatio­nal assessment­s of the country as a risky destinatio­n for investment would deter foreign investors. This is a serious setback to the country's long-term economic developmen­t. The unsatisfac­tory law and order situation that influences foreign investment could also affect investment. There is an urgent need to address these issues to ensure higher foreign direct investment that is needed for developmen­t.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka