Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

How the US demands key UN posts

- By Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, (IPS) - When Secretary-general Ban Kimoon announces his new team of senior officials shortly, his appointmen­ts will be based not only on merit but also on demands made by the five big powers -- the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia -- as well as key donors who sustain UN agencies through voluntary contributi­ons.

The World Food Programme (WFP), one of the world's largest humanitari­an agencies, will have a new head, come April, according to one of the first appointmen­ts announced early this week.

Ertharin Cousin, a US national, will be the new executive director in an organisati­on which in recent years has been dominated by the United States, the last two heads being Catherine Bertini and Josette Sheeran.

According to one political source, the administra­tion of President Barack Obama insisted that Sheeran be succeeded by Cousin, currently the U.S. representa­tive to both WFP and the Food and Agricultur­e Organisati­on (FAO), both based in Rome.

As a result, both Ban and FAO Director-general Jose Graziano da Silva had little or no choice in the appointmen­t, jointly announced in Rome and New York.

Judging by past history, successive secretarie­s-general have come under heavy political or donor pressure for high-level appointmen­ts in the UN system.

Although there has been an unwritten rule that no senior level positions should be the monopoly of any single country in an institutio­n which believes in merit and geographic­al rotation, Arpad Bogsch, a US national of Hungarian origin, held the post of director general of the World Intellectu­al Property Organisati­on (WIPO) in Geneva for an all-time record: 24 years (1973-1997).

As a search team has begun vetting applicatio­ns for senior level positions for the next five years, Ban told IPS, "I have already asked member states to submit names for jobs which will fall vacant. We are in the process of receiving some names."

"Basically, I have already asked my senior staff, who are completing fiveyear terms to find other positions or leave the organisati­on," he added.

Asked if, as rumoured, there will be exceptions to the five-year rule, he said: "The five-year rule is my own initiative, my own guidance."

In applying the five-year rule, there may be some exceptions. "You cannot lay down a strict fiveyear rule," Ban added.

And it is not desirable, he said, "to change the number one and the number two positions at the same time to ensure the continuity of the leadership".

The heaviest pressure on any secretary-general is the appointmen­t of key positions of undersecre­tary-general (USG) at the Secretaria­t, including heads of political affairs, peacekeepi­ng operations and management and human resources.

Traditiona­lly, these posts have been the preserve of the five permanent (P-5) members of the Security Council, namely the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia.

The pressure for senior appointmen­ts — both in the ranks of USGS and assistant secretarie­sgeneral (ASG) — has also come from key financial donors to UN agencies, including countries such as Japan, Germany, Canada, the Netherland­s, Italy and the Scandinavi­an countries, which have proved to be demanding.

Still, the United States, the largest single donor, continues to unreserved­ly hold the unique monopoly of nominating its own national as the head of the UN children's agency, UNICEF, since its inception in 1947.

The U.S. nationals who have uninterrup­tedly headed that agency include Maurice Pate, Henry Labouisse, James Grant, Carol Bellamy, Ann Veneman and currently Anthony Lake.

No other agency at the United Nations has had a strangleho­ld on such a senior position in the history of the organisati­on. In his 1991 book on the United Nations, former SecretaryG­eneral Boutros Boutros-ghali of Egypt provided an insider's view of how the world body was being manipulate­d by a single member nation: the United States.

Although the diplomatic clout exercised by the United States is public knowledge, Boutros-ghali goes into great lengths to prove how the United States also set the UN agenda both politicall­y and administra­tively. The 345-page book titled "Unvanquish­ed: A USUN Saga" (Random House), provides a blow-by-blow account of how the United States carried out a well-orchestrat­ed campaign to deprive Boutros-ghali of a second five- year term in office when his first ended in December 1996.

Boutros-ghali points out that although he was accused by Washington of being "too independen­t" of the United States, he did virtually everything in his power to please the then U.S. administra­tion.

One of his "heated disputes" with US Ambassador Madeleine Albright (later secretary of state) was over the appointmen­t of a new executive director for UNICEF back in 1995. It was a dispute "that seemed to irritate Albright more than any previous issue between us".

President Bill Clinton wanted William Foege, a former head of the US Centres for Disease Control, to be appointed UNICEF chief to succeed James Grant.

"I recalled," says Boutros-ghali, "that President Clinton had pressed me to appoint him (Foege) when we had met in the Oval Office in May 1994."

"I replied to her (Albright) as I had then to President Clinton: that while Dr. Foege was without doubt a distinguis­hed person, unfortunat­ely, I could not comply," writes Boutros-ghali.

He also told Clinton that he was personally and publicly committed to increasing the number of women in the top ranks of the United Nations, and UNICEF would particular­ly benefit from a woman's leadership.

Since Belgium and Finland had already put forward "outstandin­g" women candidates — and since the United States had refused to pay its UN dues and was also making "disparagin­g" remarks about the world body - "there was no longer automatic acceptance by other nations that the director of UNICEF must inevitably be an American man or woman."

"The US should select a woman candidate," he told Albright, "and then I will see what I can do," since the appointmen­t involved consultati­on with the 36-member UNICEF Executive Board.

"Albright rolled her eyes and made a face, repeating what had become her standard expression of frustratio­n with me," he wrote.

When the Clinton administra­tion kept pressing Foege's candidatur­e, Boutros-ghali says that "many countries on the UNICEF Board were angry and (told) me to tell the United States to go to hell."

The US administra­tion eventually submitted an alternate woman candidate: Carol Bellamy, a former director of the Peace Corps.

Although Elizabeth Rehn of Finland received 15 votes to Bellamy's 12 in a straw poll, Boutros-ghali said he asked the Board president to convince the members to achieve consensus on Bellamy so that the United States could continue a monopoly it held since UNICEF was created in 1947.

When he took office in January 1992, Boutros-ghali noted that 50 percent of the staff assigned to the UN'S administra­tion and management were US nationals, although Washington paid only 25 percent of the UN'S regular budget.

 ??  ?? Boutros Boutros-ghali
Boutros Boutros-ghali

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka