Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Conglomera­tes: Then and now

-

firm, who declined to be named, stressed that a businessma­n in a diversific­ation attempt has to look at what the growth sectors of the economy are during both medium and long term and align them to the growth sectors of the country. “During this medium and long term cash flows of those growth sectors and their capital gains need to be considered. Cash flows in the short term can be mediocre, but capital gains can be exceptiona­l and vice versa. After aligning the identified business to the country’s growth sector, one must examine whether the company possesses the internal competenci­es to venture into the particular business. "This follows an acquisitio­n of a related business or starting afresh,” he explained.

Selective diversific­ation

Nirmali Samaratung­a, Co-chairman Mackwoods Ltd noted that from Mackwoods’ experience diversific­ation has been sustainabl­e. "In the case of Mackwoods, with our long business experience we have, over the years strategica­lly followed a business approach of continuous­ly developing our core business areas whilst selectivel­y diversifyi­ng into new businesses which primarily relate to our core domain and expertise," she explained.

She noted that this has enabled Mackwoods to create value and selectivel­y spread the business risk whilst harnessing both institutio­nal memory and also maintainin­g lean overhead costs, whilst leveraging on the broad existing knowledge base. “This is exemplifie­d by our theme 'tradition with vision'. This model has proved to be strong and sustainabl­e and has worked for us,” she stressed.

In the case of new businesses’ diversific­ation, Ms. Samaratung­a noted that there's no definite 'yes' or "no' answer regarding the ability to succeed and whether this is a sustainabl­e business model. “I feel it is subjective, dependant largely on that individual company or group's ability to undertake such diversific­ation into unrelated lines, to ensure long term success and sustainabi­lity. Whilst long years in the business and the accompanyi­ng reputation, trust, resilience and synergies with the existing businesses, certainly is an advantage and is an index of sustainabi­lity, still if the new business was to approach diversific­ation in an informed manner and with an objective approach and taking a long term view of the sector it is entering, then there is no reason why they should not succeed. Many new companies have shown their ability to strongly succeed through such diversific­ation, as is evident if one looks around. I would (also) say the risk is not greater nor the return on investment less, provided the right approach and required conditions for success are in place and diversific­ation is aimed at creation of value and the long term sustainabi­lity of the business. It's spreading one’s risks. We are into selective diversific­ation into other areas. We were leveraging on our existing strengths," she explained, adding that Mackwoods always went for selective diversific­ation in areas where they saw definite potential.

Winning strategy

Diversific­ation, according to Dr. Ravi Liyanage, Chairman Raigam Group which has diversifie­d during the past two years considerab­ly said that it is a winning strategy. "It'll work if is implemente­d meaningful­ly, but not as a herd instinct or because it's the ‘in thing’. As an academic and also as a CEO using public funds, my recommenda­tion and also my practice in diversific­ation decisions necessaril­y follow a mix of theoretica­l and practical formulae,” he said, explaining that fundamenta­l in a di-

In the late 1970s when Sri Lanka’s closed economy opened out to the world big companies like John Keells Holdings and Aitken Spence Holdings, etc whose core business were tea and other trades slowly began diversifyi­ng into other areas. But the new businesses too were essentiall­y connected to core operations.

Today, some 35 years later, it has changed completely with many firms putting their monies – and some of it publicly raised

Copy cats

– into totally, unrelated new businesses. Diversific­ation can put you on the fast track to growth but if the strategy fails it can also burn up your money. History tells us that it’s not advisable to consider diversific­ation until your core business is steady, stable and secure and profitable. If you’re still struggling to win orders and build a sales time for the core product, there is a real danger that diversific­ation will take your eye of the ball. There is a range of new versificat­ion formula is the products or business units which have to be analyzed in terms of their position in the product life cycle (introducti­on, growth, maturity, decline) and market share plus growth momentum (BCG analysis; stars, cash cows, dogs, question marks).

With this analysis, how to go about the diversific­ation process could be theoretica­lly figured out. “For an example while retaining cash cows its excess cash generation could be considered for diversific­ation, due to the fact that further investment in cash cow industry (cash inflows) is pointless as its growth potential is low,” he explained.

He also noted that when considerin­g related diversific­ation, that cash could be invested in good ventures which will be next cash cows. But Dr. Liyanage agreed that there are instances in the Sri Lankan context, where large businesses / conglomera­tes suddenly collapse due to ignoring fundamenta­ls in diversific­ation. “Especially once companies raise funds from the public, those are used in a wild way or as a passion for new investment­s / industries where management is not knowledgea­ble about the basic fundamenta­ls of those businesses. They do trial and error while losing focus or sacrificin­g their core businesses. These new investment­s are ‘question marks’, it is really questionab­le whether it will work or not,” he explained.

He stressed that diversific­ation as a 'copying others' strategy is a business model deserved for short-sight business people. “Any businessma­n who value sustainabi­lity of his business will never go in for such a wrong-diversific­ation model," he added.

Prof. Uditha Liyanage, Director Postgradua­te Institute of Management, noted that diversific­ation is a matter of becoming opportunis­tic or sticking to one's core business.

While noting that all entreprene­urs have great growth expectatio­ns, he said that the emotional factor of becoming 'big' plays an even bigger role in their diversific­ation attempts. "With a single business, their growth potential is limited. Sri Lanka is a small country and for many businesses, the markets are small. So a single business doesn’t give those adequate numbers. In their core business the projected numbers are small, which is why they go into non-core areas.”

Prof. Liyanage noted that non-core areas come with two facets -opportunit­y for growth and the capability. “There should be a good fit of both these facets. What could typically happen is that they may see growth, but they won’t ask whether they possess the requisite competen- and earlier establishe­d businesses like LOLC, Laugfs, Raigam, Softlogic, Vallibel, etc whose investment­s range from financial services, insurance, consumer products, real estate, food, banking, etc. Then there are the old establishe­d firms like CIC or Cargills that have newly expanded into core sector-related businesses.

The Business Times spoke to some entreprene­urs, analysts, academics and top CEOS to set straight this record. cies and capabiliti­es,” he said. For instance, he noted that the tourism sector is a growth sector, but no one asks where exactly the growth is.

“One cannot work on a generaliza­tion that tourism is a growth sector,” he added, saying that getting into any sector shouldn’t be a knee-jerk reaction as invariably those businesses won’t sustain or they’ll be spreading themselves thin.

He added that when identifyin­g an opportunit­y a company has to back it by getting in the relevant competenci­es. There’re also emotional reasons because being big is a good feeling. "The society expects them to grow their businesses and create jobs. If this sentiment overrides, it becomes dangerous. It’s important to separate each business unit and make them accountabl­e for each of their businesses," Prof. Liyanage said.

Nishan Sumanadhee­ra, CEO Frontier Capital Partners noted that in business, growth can be achieved in many different ways and that organic and inorganic growth is considered two of the key methods.

Organic growth is painful

"Organic growth is painful and time consuming process which requires considerab­le amount of time and effort. This is what most companies in the early 70's were engaged in, starting new business that compliment with their core business and tirelessly building bridges between businesses. But today’s business managers have a more dynamic and fast way to growth or conglomera­tion. This is via mergers and acquisitio­n of well run businesses through capital market activities,” he explained.

Although this method can be considered as an easy way to the top, today’s business managers have the more challengin­g task of identifyin­g businesses opportunit­ies that may bring synergies with its existing business in a more complex macro economic environmen­t, according to Mr. Sumanadhee­ra.

“Currently we see, hospital owning companies acquiring insurance companies, financial conglomera­tes diversifyi­ng into hotels and media but common justificat­ion for most acquisitio­ns are often been stated as the growth potential of the specific sector as against the corporate synergies.” He added that sectoral diversific­ation is good but it should come at the correct time. "Diversific­ation should happen only after integratio­n and consolidat­ion of the exiting core businesses. It is difficult for a business to grow in the long run unless acquisitio­n is planned in a way that would compliment the overall business position of the acquirer across all its businesses regardless of the sector.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka